101551: Understanding Society - Coronavirus, Social Change and Social Inequality - Sociology Assignment help

Assignment Task:

Learning Outcomes: 

1. Identify relevant sources and assess approaches to and claims about social processes and institutions in contemporary society. 

2. Apply a sociological understanding of power, social inequality and social change to case study materials. 

3. Demonstrate reading, writing and referencing skills commensurate with university scholarship. 

Case Study: Coronavirus, social change and social inequality 

As discussed in the week 12 module, the coronavirus pandemic and its effects can be understood as an example of rapid, global social change.

In response to the serious health risks posed by the spread of coronavirus, people from around the world are experiencing an adjustment in their work and study practices, social interactions and capacity to travel. The unprecedented impacts of the pandemic, including national ‘lock downs’, have severely impacted employment and therefore social and national economies. Social change and how coronavirus is reshaping individual lives, communities, governments and broader society, are topics of interest for sociologists. So too is the data that reveals the differential ways in which the impacts of coronavirus are felt. In short, coronavirus heralds social change, but it also highlights existing social issues and inequalities throughout societies. 

Question: 

Having considered the issues raised in the above articles, which form the basis of the case study, and drawing on AT LEAST 4 ACADEMIC SOURCES, students will provide a 1000-word response to the following question: 

What does the coronavirus pandemic reveal about power and/or structure and agency, and the enduring nature of social inequality? 

Detailed Instructions: 

1. When writing your response, be sure to explain each of your chosen key concepts with reference to relevant academic literature (your readings from the unit are a good place to start). 

2. You might opt to consider power, structure and agency and social inequality; or you might choose to look at power and social inequality; or structure and agency and social inequality. The choice is yours. 

3. Once you have explained what each of the key concepts you have chosen to examine refers to, then you should apply them to the coronavirus case study. 

This means drawing on examples from the articles above and analysing them sociologically. 

4. In other words, you must think about what is presented in the media articles and then consider how the sociological reading you have undertaken, and the concepts and theories discussed therein, help you to make sense of what is observed. 

5. Your response should be written in an essay style, meaning it should contain an introduction, body and conclusion. 

6. Your response should be referenced using Harvard referencing. 

7. You must use a minimum of 4 academic sociological sources to support your discussion, which need to be cited in the body of your text and included in a 

reference list. 

8. Any of the empirical examples from the case study that you refer to or draw upon should also be referenced appropriately. 

This Sociology Assignment has been solved by our Sociology Experts at onlineassignmentbank. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.