200861:Work Health and Safety-Management Assignment Help

PART A. Answer Question 1.

Question 1.

Working in groups during the semester, a risk management plan was developed by you for a particular hazard for a specified context.

a) List in ‘dot points’: (i) for whom the report was written, (ii) who you were pretending to be as the author of the report, (iii) the hazard addressed, and (iv) the context for the plan.

b) You analysed and rated the level of risk (e.g. severity versus likelihood) and then made recommendations for how to address the hazard using hierarchy of controls. Describe the recommendations and explain how you deemed them in relation to reasonably practicable standard.

c) Explain how your recommendations for the hierarchy of controls met the requirements of the PCBU’s primary duty of care clause.

PART B. Choose two questions only to answer from Questions 2 to 6.

Question 2.

WHS incidents can be described and evaluated using the contributions of different expert disciplines. For one of the cases below, explain how any two different expert disciplines would have explained differently, how fatalities could have been prevented.

Piper Alpha oil/gas platform explosion

Waterfall City Rail train derailment

BP Texas City oil refinery explosion

Rana Plaza building collapse

Forever Young: Tim’s Story electrocution

BP Deepwater Horizon oil/gas platform explosion (‘Macondo blowout’)

Note: Your answer must demonstrate knowledge of at least two listed case studies. Your answer must apply your knowledge of any two of the expert/professional disciplines to the case studies.

Part B questions continue next page.

Question 3.

One way of explaining safety culture is by referring to values, attitudes, assumptions and beliefs that employees and management hold towards issues os safety. Referring to any of the case studies (BP Texas City oil refinery explosion, Piper Alpha, Waterfall, Rana Plaza and BP Deepwater Horizon), discuss how theirvalues, attitudes, assumptions and beliefs toward safety culture, was inferior to that of operations in highly reliable organisations (HROs).

Question 4.

Answer both parts:

a) Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW) stipulates that workers must be consulted regarding decisions about safe working practices. Discuss when, why and how organisations must involve workers in WHS safety decision making

b) There is international consensus that worker involvement and participation (WIP) greatly assists in creating a culture of safety at the workplace. Discuss why WIP should become a legal requirement

Question 5.

The Fair Work Commission deems micromanagement as a psychosocial risk. Using Karask demand-control-support model,

I. explain how micromanagement could cause a psychological injury

II. discuss why organisations should not only rely solely on person-focused interventions to reduce the occurrence of psychosocial risk,

Question 6.

For the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW), describe the duties of Officers of PCBUs (‘person conducting a business or undertaking’).

WHS law also recommends ‘self-regulation’ approach to implementing WHS Systems. Discuss why the law requires Officers to meet their duty of care to a standard of ‘due diligence’.

This 200861: Management Assignment Help has been solved by our Management experts at onlineassignmentbank. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.