401207 - Western Sydney University - Health Variations - Perioperative - Nursing Case Study Assignment

Assignment Task:

Case Study:

Jordan James is a 25-year-old male. Jordan has been admitted to hospital with a five-day history of right lower abdominal cramping pain, a feeling of abdominal bloating, nausea and vomiting, and an increased amount of abdominal gurgling and rumbling. Jordan stated that over recent weeks, he has experienced persistent diarrhoea, lower right abdominal pain and tenderness, fatigue and malaise. Jordan stated he has not been able to keep up with his work demands and is not getting quality rest and sleep. Due to his diarrhoea and current vomiting, Jordan states that he has been reluctant to eat or drink much during the past five (5) days. He reported that he has lost seven kilograms in the last three weeks. Jordan was diagnosed with Crohn’s disease when he was 17 years old. His Crohn’s disease was diagnosed after Jordan presented to his general practitioner (GP) with a perianal abscess. Since his diagnosis and surgical management of his perianal abscess, Jordan’s Crohn’s disease has been managed with pharmacological (infliximab) and dietary strategies, and medical monitoring. During this time, Jordan has had a number of exacerbations of Crohn’s disease. Jordan’s observations on admission were

• Blood pressure: 92/52 mm/Hg
• Pulse rate: 112 beats/minute
• Weak peripheral pulses
• Respiratory rate: 24 breaths/minute
• Temperature: 38.3C
• Sa02: 97% in room air
• Weight: 75 kilograms
• Height: 188 cm

Urinalysis: o specific gravity: 1035 o dark coloured urine o no other abnormalities noted On examination, Jordan had a distended abdomen, a tender mass in his right lower abdominal quadrant and audible bowel sounds. His skin was pale and dry with poor turgor. His extremities were cool to touch. The medical officer (MO) noted that Jordan had poor capillary refill and flat neck veins. The MO ordered some preliminary blood tests and an abdominal CT scan. Initial pathology results

•  Haemoglobin: 7.9mmol/L (8.1 – 11.2mmol/L) • Haematocrit: 51% (35 – 47%)
• WBC: 13.9 X 109/L (4.3 – 10.8 X 109/L) • Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR): 26.5mm/hour (0 – 13 mm/hour)
•  C-reactive protein (CRP): 30.7mg/dl (20 mg/dl)
•  Albumin: 30.5g/L (35 – 50 g/L) The MO returns to discuss the results of the CT scan with Jordan.

Jordan has developed a stricture causing bowel obstruction in his terminal ileum. Jordan is referred to a gastroenterological surgeon. The surgeon explains to Jordan that he will require surgical resection of the affected ileum and end-to-end anastomosis of the ends of the ileum. The surgeon also tells Jordan that he has numerous large patches of inflamed mucosa and submucosa throughout his small bowel and colon. 

Questions:

Question 1. Prioritise the nursing responsibilities and associated rationales related to the administration of pethidine to Jordan. This response is to include the nursing responsibilities and associated rationales prior to the administration of the pethidine to Jordan, the legal nursing responsibilities and associated rationales related to the administration of pethidine to Jordan, and the nursing responsibilities and associated rationales after administering pethidine to Jordan.

Question 2. Describe the structural and functional changes that occur in the pathogenesis of Crohn’s disease that led to Jordan’s weight loss and the development of the stricture in Jordan’s ileum.

Question 3. Describe the characteristics of the intravenous fluid that was ordered for Jordan, and the rationale, related to Jordan’s specific fluid balance status, for the administration of this intravenous fluid to Jordan.

This 401207: Nursing Assignment has been solved by our Nursing Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.