Highlights
Task:
BACKGROUND
Endometrial scratching (with the use of a pipelle biopsy) is a technique proposed to facilitate embryo implantation and increase the probability of pregnancy in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF).
METHODS
We conducted a pragmatic, multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial. Eligible women were undergoing IVF (fresh-embryo or frozen-embryo transfer), with no recent exposure to disruptive intrauterine instrumentation (e.g., hysteros- copy). Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either endometrial scratching (by pipelle biopsy between day 3 of the cycle preceding the embryo- transfer cycle and day 3 of the embryo-transfer cycle) or no intervention. The primary outcome was live birth.
RESULTS
A total of 1364 women underwent randomization. The frequency of live birth was 180 of 690 women (26.1%) in the endometrial-scratch group and 176 of 674 women (26.1%) in the control group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.27). There were no significant between-group differences in the rates of ongoing pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, ectopic preg- nancy, or miscarriage. The median score for pain from endometrial scratching (on a scale of 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating worse pain) was 3.5 (interquartile range, 1.9 to 6.0).
CONCLUSIONS
Endometrial scratching did not result in a higher rate of live birth than no inter- vention among women undergoing IVF. (Funded by the University of Auckland and others; PIP Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12614000626662.)
The success rate of in vitro fertil- ization (IVF) remains modest; the proba- bility of live birth is approximately 25 to 30% per initiated cycle.1-3 Endometrial scratching, which involves the obtaining of an endometrial- biopsy sample with a sampler such as the pipelle, has been proposed to increase the success rate of IVF. It has been postulated that the endome-trial injury, or “scratch,” that results from the biopsy may facilitate embryo implantation by inflammatory and immunologic mechanisms.4-7 Pooled results from randomized trials have suggested benefit from this procedure, especially in women in whom implantation had failed previ- ously.8
However, many trials have had methodo- logic limitations, including small size, and un- clear methods of randomization and concealment of trial-group assignments; some have been published only as conference abstracts.9-12 One of the larger trials with a robust design showed a lack of benefit from endometrial scratching; a subgroup analysis suggested lower rates of preg- nancy with this intervention than with no inter- vention among women in whom implantation had failed repeatedly.10,13 Despite conflicting evi- dence, a recent survey showed that 83% of fertil-ity clinicians in the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand offer or recommend endome- trial scratching, which can cost patients as much as £400 (approximately $500 U.S.).14
This Medical Science Assignment has been solved by our Medical Science Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.