ACCM4300: Financial Reporting – Report Writing - Accounting and Finance Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Your Task

You are required to prepare a business letter to answer key accounting issues in regard to acquisition analysis of partly owned subsidiary and intra-group transactions.

Assessment Description

Assume that you are a team of graduate accountants working for independent consulting & accounting firm, situated at 100 Flinders Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000. The Manager of your firm, Ms. Olivia Dawson, has asked you to prepare the SOA in response to an email received from a client, Mr. Greg Coles, the Managing Director of Moon Ltd, raising several accounting issues. Please refer to the email on the next page.

The maximum length for the body of the letter is 1,500 words. You should address all the technical issues/discussion in the letter, followed by a Reference List.

• Part A: Technical component 25% - This mark covers the technical content of your advice and the explanation of each of the issues, the calculations, and the sources used. Also letter Writing covers the generic skills of Letter writing; layout, clear meaning, structure and organisation, appropriate tone and grammar, spelling, and punctuation, etc. throughout the whole assignment.
• Part B: Communication Skills – Letter Writing 5% - This mark covers the generic skills of Letter writing; layout, clear meaning, structure and organisation, appropriate tone and grammar, spelling, and punctuation, etc. throughout the whole assignment.

Case Study

One of your clients has emailed your firm with several queries. Draft a business letter in reply and make sure you reference any relevant sources relating to your advice, for example, AASBs, Corporations Act, and relevant websites. See the email below.

Re: Accounting Issues: Year Ending 30 June 2022

From: Greg Coles ()

Sent: 10 August 2022

To: Olivia Dawson (O.Dawson@consultinggroup.com.au)

Dear Olivia,

As discussed, our chief accountant is currently on leave. I need to understand the following transactions and events to present to the Board regarding the financial impacts of our recent takeover. The chief accountant left me a note, but I am unsure of the effect of the below transactions. Can you please provide me with a more detailed explanation just in case the board request further information? Please remember the Board of directors have varying degrees of accounting knowledge, so please limit the use of technical accounting terms.

Recently Moon Ltd acquired 100% of the issued shares of Sun Ltd for $240,000 (Sun Ltd.’s owner’s equity at the time of purchasing was $300,000 made up of share capital of $240,000 and retained earnings of $60000). One of the liabilities of Sun Ltd was $54,000 for the dividend payable but not yet paid, and our accountant informed me that the shares were acquired based on Ex-dividend. In addition, one of the areas of discussion during the negotiation process was the current court case that Sun Ltd was involved in. No monetary amount was disclosed, but the company’s lawyers had placed a $18000 amount on the probable payout to settle the case.

Having prepared the acquisition analysis as part of preparing the consolidated financial statements for Moon Ltd, can you explain how the unrecorded contingent liability of $18,000 by the subsidiary Sun Ltd affects the group’s goodwill? I believe the goodwill for Moon Ltd should be $60,000 (being $240,000 less $300,000). Is this correct?

In addition, will the dividend payable by the subsidiary entity Sun Ltd impact the acquisition analysis? Please explain?

The accountant told me that she had eliminated transactions incurred between the companies Moon Ltd and Sun Ltd. The sales are legitimate, we have exchanged invoices and contracts, so can you explain why we need to eliminate the inter-company transactions? I have extracted two examples below. Would you please examine the following transactions for errors? If incorrect, explain why and provide me with the corrected journal entries.

1. At the beginning of the current period, Moon Ltd sold Equipment to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Sun Ltd, for $960,000. Moon Ltd had initially paid $2,400,000 for this asset, and at the time of sale to Sun, Ltd had charged depreciation of $1,800,000. This asset is used differently in Sun Ltd from how it was used in Moon Ltd; thus, whereas Moon Ltd used a 15% p.a. straight-line depreciation method, Sun Ltd uses a 25% straight-line depreciation method. In calculating the depreciation expense for the consolidated group, the group accountant is unsure which depreciation rate should be applied and which depreciation rate to use.
2. On 1 October 2021, Sun Ltd sold inventory for $75,000 to Moon Ltd at cost plus 25%. On 30 June 2022, Moon Ltd sold two-thirds of the inventory to other entities for $25,000 but still holds one-third of these inventories as of 30 June 2022. Can we debit Sales for $150,000, credit the Cost of Sales for $75,000 on 30 June 2022? Do we need to do anything else?

Please respond by letter (not email) as I would like to present this to the Board. I look forward to hearing from you shortly.

Regards

Greg Coles

Managing Director, Moon Ltd Level 6,

12 Bright Street,

Perth WA 6000

This ACCM4300-Accounting and Finance Assignment has been solved by our Accounting and Finance Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing Style. Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered.

You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turn tin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.