Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn Ltd - Law Assignment Help

Assignment Task

QUESTION I.
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn Ltd is a company that operates in Auckland. It is a language institute where Russian and other languages are taught. It also operates as a cultural centre.
The Registrar receives an application to reserve the name Alekxandr Solzhenitzyn Ltd. The company will be based in Auckland and will offer financial advice on cryptocurrencies. The name is reserved.
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn Ltd contacts you to object the Registrar’s decision to give the name reservation.
You are aware of Paint Factory Ltd v Registrar of Companies and its view regarding Stanley-Hunt Earthmovers Ltd v Registrar. Both decisions are equally authoritative.
Read Paint Factory Ltd v Registrar of Companies and offer reasoned legal advice to your client to object the reservation of the name Alekxandr Solzhenitzyn Ltd.
(Paint Factory is available on Moodle in the Company Name section).

QUESTION II.
Jia and her boyfriend Ahmed plan to incorporate a company. Jia is wealthier than Ahmed is. Two excellent business opportunities appear and there is no time to wait for the incorporation. They have different levels of risk for the company to be incorporated.
Opportunity No 1 has a certain risk for the company in terms of compliance with its obligations under the prospective Contract No 1.
Opportunity No 2 has low risk for the company. It is highly likely that the company will be able to meet its obligations under the prospective Contract No 2.
Jia and Ahmed have decided that each of them will be involved in only one pre-incorporation contract.
What type of Pre-incorporation contract would you recommend to them for Opportunity 1? Explain your choice. 10%What type of Pre-incorporation contract would you recommend to them for Opportunity 2? Explain your choice.
Who, Jia or Ahmed, should be involved in Contract 1 and explain his/her role in the transaction?
Who, Jia or Ahmed, should be involved in Contract 2 and explain his/her role in the transaction?

QUESTION III.
Read BISHOP WARDEN PROPERTY HOLDINGS LTD v AUTUMN TREE LTD [2018] NZCA 285 [2 August 2018].
Assume that Tina’s assistant becomes aware of the negotiations with Bishop and calls Blomfield before the transaction is made on August 3 2017 advising him that Anna has been appointed as a director. This was the first and last conversation between Tina’s assistant and Blomfield.
Blomfield undertakes the QV search and the transaction goes ahead as described in the judgment.
What is the legal significance of this call? Identify the relevant provision and apply it to the facts.

This Law Assignment has been solved by our Law experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.