A. Review each chosen complication and briefly link it to the physiology of the renal condition. For example, anaemia is related to the altered.
B. Critically analyse the management interventions that the patient was or is still experiencing using evidence-based findings. Justify and critique the interventions above by drawing on recent evidence-based scholarly literature. Include medications, allied health-related or nursing interventions. Do not include haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis as a management strategy, but for AKI, you can discuss the use of continuous renal replacement therapies.
C. Are there new treatments or guidelines, or care including allied health interventions that could improve treatment? Include these options in your discussion.
This section should be heavily referenced to justify treatment.
You should combine parts 3A, B and C for one complication at a time.
Brief introduction mentioning that MBD is one of your chosen complications
The case history review in step 2 should include their bone disease symptoms and related treatments. Current blood results or observations can be included.
Step 3A should briefly review the pathophysiology of why your patient has bone disease.
The main discussion (step 3B) should review what management/treatments they are receiving, how these work and a critique of their effectiveness in your patient (subsequent blood results and ongoing symptoms) including other treatment options (step 3C) if available.
Repeat this for all your chosen complications (It is recommended you limit to two or three complications so you can explore in enough depth).
Finally, write a summative conclusion to highlight how effective the management of the patient.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.