Highlights
Task
This assessment involves analysing a play-based artefact with one philosophical lens.
PURPOSE
The purpose of this assessment task is to:
LO 1: Elucidate and apply knowledge and understanding of both the historical and philosophical underpinnings of early childhood education.
LO 2: Critically review formal and informal engagements with place, drawing from diverse theoretical scholarship to work towards a reconciled and respectful practice.
Write up your analysis with the following headings:
Introduction to play-based artefact
Include an image
Briefly describe the object and how or why children use it, how you have seen it used as a play thing or its potential uses
Connection to place
Describe any context, or connections this object has to place.
Analysis using a
Discuss your artefact with reference to one perspective (examples listed below)
What do you see when considering this object with this lens? How does it work with or challenge your chosen lens?
Use 2 – 3 readings from the unit to support your discussion
INSTRUCTIONS
To get started on your assessment task, please follow the instructions below;
0. Identify your play-based artefact.
1. Start thinking about your chosen artefact from a variety of perspectives. To assist you, consider:
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
The following levels of criteria will be used to grade this assessment task:
Criterion 1: Demonstrates critical reflection
You will do this in your first section and throughout the written piece.
What is the role of play?
What are the social, political and philosophical implications of the things that children play with?
Criterion 2: Engages with the idea of 'place' in children's play (s)
What role does 'place' have in the children's play? How is the artefact used in place? How is it different if it is used in different places? Can you make a connection to Indigenous perspectives about place?
Criterion 3: Analysis of artefact
Choose a highly relevant theoretical perspective to analyse your artefact. Show understanding of the perspective through your analysis.
Criterion 4: Clarity of ideas
Make sure your work is written clearly, in appropriate academic style. Proofread your work for errors in spelling and grammar. Stick to the word limit.
Criterion 5: Referencing
References in correct Harvard style with both in-text citations and a reference list.
This Arts & Humanities Assignment has been solved by our Arts & Humanities Expert at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing Style. Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered.
You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turn tin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.