Analysis and Evaluation of Clinical Care for a Deteriorating Patient - Medical Science Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Task Format

In this assessment task, you are required to watch a video scenario of a team of health care professionals involved in the care of a Deteriorating Patient.

Task Description

Part A (Criterion 1): 

Review and critical analyse the following three aspects of the video scenario with reference to the clinical reasoning cycle

• Implementation of the ABCDE assessment framework
• Nursing interventions/considerations
• Pharmacological interventions

Use the clinical reasoning cycle to help you gather evidence as you evaluate the care provided to the deteriorating patient in the scenario. To help you start, ask yourself the following questions...

• What did the team do well? Where did the A to E assessment breakdown and how could the team improve?
• What do you think about the choice of nursing interventions and considerations? Was SRN Kimmy, able to process the collected cues and identify that there was a problem? And what role did RN Grace have in helping Kimmy establish goals and move forward with a plan?
• Consider that pharmacological interventions used in the scenario? Did the team use best practices? What does the literature recommend? Was something vital missed?
• Was the care and pharmacological interventions effective? And did this impact on patient outcomes?

Part B (Criterion 2): Critically reflect on the scenario to evaluate the impact of interprofessional communication and personcentred approach of the team on patient outcome.

Exceptional critical reflection of the impact of interprofessional communication and PC approach of the team on patient outcome. Clear reference to NMBA RN standards for Practice (2016) & NSQHSS(2019).

With reference to the NMBA Registered nurse standards for practice (2016) and the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards (2019)*, critically reflect on how the following impacted on patient outcomes;

• Interprofessional communication
• Person-centred care

*Please make reference to one NMBA Registered nurse standards for practice and one National Safety and Quality Health Service Standard.

Please choose ONE of the following NMBA Registered nurse standards for practice (2016)

• Standard 1: Thinks critically and analyses nursing practice
• Standard 2: Engages in therapeutic and professional relationships
• Standard 3: Maintains the capability for practice

AND

Please choose ONE of the following National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards (2019)

• Partnering with Consumers Standard
• Communicating for Safety Standard
• Recognise and respond to Acute Deterioration Standard

To help you start, ask yourself the following questions...

• Did the behaviour of the healthcare professionals in the scenario, influence the interprofessional communication? How did this impact the provision of person-centred care? Did this have any consequences for the patient?
• Did the health professionals uphold the NMBA and NSQHS standards? What processes do the NSQHS use in relation to communication and person-centred care? What about the practice and behaviour regulated by the NMBA in relation to these? · Review Module 1.20 and 1.21 which focuses on Interprofessional and team-based communication for patient safety.
• Access e-book, Critical conversations for patient safety, by Tracy Levett-Jones, available via NUR239 Readings list.

Criterion 3a: Writes in a structured, succinct and wellinformed manner. 

It is expected that you structure your writing with an introduction, main paragraphs and conclusion. You should write in complete sentences, and do not use headings, bullet points, or tables. You may wish to format the paragraphs within the first part of this assignment to follow the structure of the ABCDE framework.

Academic writing is a lifelong skill, and there will always be room to improve your writing skills throughout your study journey. There are a number of ways you can do this:

• Enroll in the Study Toolkit on MyLo
• Go to the Learning and Study Support site where you will see several services, including Studiosity.
• Look at the following guidelines for academic writing. These give helpful hints around rules for word count, font choice and lining spacing.

Criterion 3b: Substantiates work with scholarly sources and accurate referencing using Harvard system. 

Remember that scholarly literature isn’t restricted to journal articles. Clinical practice guidelines are considered high-level evidence guiding best practice management of patients.

• The Australian Resuscitation Council is a great resource for this assessment
• If you are not sure where to start, visit the UTAS library databases CINAHL (for nursing specific articles) and JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute for best practice guidelines).
• The UTAS Harvard Referencing site is a great resource that covers the technicalities of referencing. This site also has referencing examples.
• The Referencing page in the Study Toolkit is also helpful. It gives some great guidance on how to incorporate references into your writing.

This Medical Science Assignment has been solved by our Medical Science Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing Style. Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered.

You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turn tin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.