Analysis of Foundational Study of Management - In the Context of Contemporary Multidisciplinary Business - Management Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Task:

Analysis of Foundational Study of Management - in the context of contemporary multidisciplinary business
This assessment task is designed to address course learning outcomes:
CLO1: Evaluate leadership and management research and justify the application of management theory in contemporary contexts.
CLO2: Research management theory and explain how this theory applies to contemporary and socially responsible practices.
CLO4: Critically reflect on the relationship between management theory and management research evidence and communicate your knowledge of responsible management practices.
TASK Topic:
“Management theories are helping organisations in establishing socially responsible management practices along with increased efficiency and reduced negative impact on employee wellbeing.”

• Considering the above statement, Analyse classical theories and their application in contemporary multidisciplinary business context. This paper focuses on:
• Human relation approach and it’s features.
• How Human relation approach has helped organisation promote productivity and efficiency along with a sustainable and socially responsible human resource management.
• How much relevance does Human Relations approach have in ‘New-Normal’ business environment - Covid 19 Era (businesses trying to operate with COVID-19 complications)Refer to the Marking Guide for academic requirements.
• Assessment tasks help available online
• Submission Requirements
• Read & follow Marking Guide requirements (page 2 of this document) before you start your Analysis.
• Canvas (Turnitin Submissions): Aim for no more than 20% similarity (excluding cover sheet).
• Submission must be in Word format and can be submitted multiple times before due date and time.
• When submitting work through Canvas, you must go to the Assessment declaration web page, and must ‘click through’ this page, thereby declaring your authorship of the work.
• Word limit: minimum 1750 – maximum 2000 words (excluding reference list)
• Font: Calibri 11 OR Times New Roman12 OR Arial 10
• Page Numbers
• Spell check: ensure you perform a spell check; observe punctuation, syntax, and grammar rules. Harvard Referencing Style: refer to Referencing - RMIT University for help. Ensure to acknowledge all used quotations, as well all paraphrased ideas or concepts.
• Papers without referencing and reference list will receive ZERO marks for the Assignment.
• BUSM4295/BUSM4323 - MARKING GUIDE - Assessment 1, Semester 2 2021
• Key elements:
• Human relations Approach
• Socially responsible practices
• Contemporary management practices
• Student Name: ………………………………………………………… ID: …………………… GROUP: ……………. GRADE/30%
• REQUIREMENTS Max Actual
• Introduction (indicative word count: 400 words)
• Tittle and study clearly outlined (1 mark).
• The main ideas of Human relations approach are clearly defined (3 marks).
• Identify the authors of the theories, historical context and application (1 mark). 5 Analysis (indicative word count: 1000 words)
• Demonstrate how Human relations approach have been applied in the contemporary world (2000 – 2020). You must provide clear referenced examples with explanations (4 marks)
• Analyse how Human relations approach can be used to positively influence Management (4 marks)
• Investigate how Human relations approach have benefited Contemporary Businesses with Sustainability Management of the workplaces and/or products/services and/or production process and/or their stakeholders (internal and external) (4 marks).
• Student point of view: Critically state using examples – How much relevance does Human Relations approach have in ‘New Normal’ business environment (businesses trying to operate/cope with COVID-19 complications) (4 marks). 16 NOTE: All the main points of the Analysis must be well supported by literature, research and examples
• Conclusion (indicative word count: 350 words)
• Summarise the main ideas of your analysis with new and stronger statements (3 marks).
• Supported by literature, provide arguments and recommendations on how Human relations approach can help contemporary businesses improve performance in Sustainability Management (human resources/environment/productivity) 3 marks). 6 Referencing: Harvard referencing style must be observed.
• Assessments without in text referencing and reference list will receive ZERO marks for the whole assignment
• Min 5 academic in text references (academic sources may only include: journals, textbooks or literally material)
• Consistent in text referencingReference list in an alphabetical order 3 This report paper is to be 1750 (Minimum) – 2000 (Maximum) words in length
• TOTAL 30 Grades
• allocation Not achieved
• Failed Basic
• Pass Proficient
• Credit-Distinction Excellent
• High Distinction
• Introduction
• 5 marks 0 - 0.5
• Not achieved
• Shallow poorly attempted 1 – 1.5
• Superficial. The introduction would have benefitted from a neat and clear outline.
• Relevant points are not clearly visible, and foundation for the rest of the paper is not clearly established. 2 – 2.5
• Clear and succinct introduction.
• Highlighted relevant points. Provided adept foundation for the rest of the paper. 3 - 5
• Exceptionally clear introduction. All the aspects interconnected well.
• Provided exceptional foundation for the rest of the paper.

The above Management  Assignment has been solved by our  Management Assignment  Experts at onlineassignmentbank. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire considered worthy of the highest distinction.