Highlights
Instruction
You work in in a legal practice and ultimately will be required to provide advice to the firm’s client, Sally. Sally has detailed the following facts.
Factual Scenario
Basketball and More Pty Ltd (‘BAM’) is a company that specialises in the sale of basketball rings and backboards. The company operates in and is registered in Victoria. Paul is the director of the company.
Rings and Boards Pty Ltd (‘RAB’) is the company which manufactures the rings and backboards for BAM. RAB also operates in and is registered in Victoria, and Zain is the director of the company.
In his capacity as director of BAM, Paul sends a written order for 500 basketball rings and 500 basketball backboards to Zain in his capacity as director of RAB. Paul includes clear instructions that the rings and backboards must include a warning symbol which is in complete accordance with the Product Safety Australia, Mandatory Standards:
Sam expects to get $90,000 worth of retail sales for the basketball rings and backboards.
On the basis of the order, Zain manufactured 500 basketball rings and 500 basketball backboards and sent them to Paul. The rings and backboards have the RAB logo printed on them.
When Paul inspected the rings and backboards, he discovered that, contrary to the mandatory standards, they are not clearly marked with the requisite warning symbol. The human figure has been printed in red ink. However, the rings and backboards had the requisite written warning in complete accordance with the Product Safety Australia, Mandatory Standards.
Paul refused to pay and returned the rings and backboards to RAB.
RAB incurred costs of $30,000 for the order. Zain was afraid of losing further contracts with BAM and so accepted the returned rings and backboards, but also did not want his company to have to cover the $30,000 in production costs. So, rather than destroying or rectifying the non-compliant rings and backboards, he decided to sell them via an online site to recoup those costs.
Zain then advertised the rings and backboards as a ‘Buy It Now’ purchase on an online site, which is a direct wholesale site. To create the advertisement and to enter the site and to provide the item description and bidding details, Zain provided the full name, ACN and contact details of BAM. However, for the payment, he used the account details of RAB.
Sally is a sole trader of a small children’s store in Victoria. While looking online for new stock she saw the advertisement and recognised the company name of BAM. She had used the company’s products in the past and had been very pleased with the quality and compliance and how well they had sold, so she put in a bid of $30,000 and won the wholesale auction.
Zain was keen to get the rings and backboards off his premises, so he delivered the goods to Sally on credit, noting that she had 30 days to pay the $30,000. When the rings and backboards arrived, Sally inspected them and discovered the mandatory warning was non-compliant and thus she could not legally sell them.
Sally now seeks your firm’s advice about any possible remedies at common law, equity and statute.
The file has been allocated to you. You must now undertake some initial legal research to:
(i) to locate ten sources that are relevant to advising Sally,
(ii) to cite those sources and to demonstrate how you found them, and
(iii) undertake an initial analysis of each source to indicate how and why it might assist Sally to achieve any remedies potentially available to her.
NOTES RELEVANT TO THE COMPLETION OF ASSESSMENT TASKS
(A) GENERAL NOTES
Assessment 2 is a task to develop your legal research and writing skills, and to start you on the track of thinking about how the law can be applied in different situations (or not). The focus is on training you to be able to look at a factual situation and to make an assessment about what are the material facts (that is, the relevant facts) that have the potential to enliven areas of the law and:
The ability to make the assessment about what is potentially applicable law comes with a little knowledge of the law and with experience. And the fact that you are not expected to know the potentially applicable law in this task in advance or in detail is the reason you have been provided with the areas of law that are potentially applicable (see point (2) below). You will be assessed primarily on (please see the Marking Guide also):
In terms of the relationship between Assessment 2 and Assessment 3, the following is noted. The ultimate purpose of Assessment 3 is to consider and to assess the ACCC statement provided in the instructions for that task. However, rather than undertaking that consideration and assessment in the abstract, you are to use the factual scenario of Assessment 2 (using the research you do for this task – and you can add new research if you wish) to provide some initial grounding for the Assessment 3 discussion. This means that in Assessment 3 you can start by discussing what your client’s situation is likely to be and then to use that discussion as a reference point when you move on to the main purpose of Assessment 3 – which, as noted, is to consider what the ACCC statement says. In other words, use your client’s situation as a platform to consider and to discuss how well the Anglo-Australian legal system is working for people in situations similar to your clients, including some overview of the historical development of this law and some critical assessment of how well it is working. There is not right or wrong answer in this task – it will be the quality of your argument and discussion that matters.
(B) ASSESSMENT 2
For the moment, while you ought to be aware of what will be required in Assessment 3, your focus is Assessment 2. For Assessment 2:
This Management has been solved by our PhD Experts at My Uni Paper.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.