Highlights
Subject Learning Outcomes
ASSESSMENT ITEM 2: DESCRIPTION
As part of your development in the area of Learning, Memory, Cognition and Language, we will be introducing you to the skills involved with researching what the literature has to say about a given topic and presenting a considered overview of such in an academic manner. For this assessment, you are asked to conduct a literature review to address one of the two topics listed below.
Topics are centered around the content based on Memory and Cognition. Specific requirements are indicated for each topic. Please be sure to review the task statements. You only need to choose one topic to write your Literature Review. Choosing a topic outside of this list will result in a fail grade. Follow the assessment rubric for more guidance on the marking criteria for this assessment item.
General Requirements:
Ensure you present your review in an academic writing style. This entails formal, accurate, concise and objective writing that cites all evidence discussed. Note the contrast to a journalistic writing style which is entertaining, often subjective and uses an informal structure.
We expect that all of the work that you cite in your assignment will be in your own words – direct quotations should be kept to a maximum of 1. We expect that at least 99% of the work will be using your own words, paraphrasing what you have understood from the work of others whom you have read.
Your work should follow the formatting requirements stipulated by the APA 7th edition guidelines. Additionally, referencing (both in-text and in the reference list) should also follow APA 7th edition formatting conventions.
Topic 2 – Discounting memories from older adults
Background
There is evidence to suggest that an individual can be vulnerable to incorporating socially suggested false memories into their memory reports. However, the age of the person providing the false memories can impact the degree to which these false memories are “believed” and incorporated. That is, according to Meade, McNabb, Lindeman and Smith (2017) when attention is drawn to the age of the person providing the false memories people are less likely to incorporate these false memories into their memory reports when they come from older as opposed to younger people. Hence, people may only discount memory from older adults when age is made highly salient.
Task for Topic 2
Start by finding and reading the following journal article:
Meade, M.L., McNabb, J. C., Lindeman, M. I. H., & Smith, J. L. (2017). Discounting input from older adults: the role of age salience on partner age effects in the social contagion of memory. Memory (Hove), 25(5), 704–716. Subsequently, review the literature relating to the interplay between the incorporation of false memories into an individual’s memory reports and the age of the person providing the false memories. Compare and contrast how different researchers have examined these issues. Consider the implications of key research findings for potential biases resulting in the memories of older adults being discounted.
Assessment requirements
Structure:
Generally, we expect to see an introduction, body, conclusion, and references. Introduction, body, and conclusion are not required to be included as headers in your assignment. Here is a brief overview of the sections which are commonly found in this sort of submission:
1. Introduction: Define or identify the general topic, issue, or area of concern, to provide an appropriate context for reviewing the literature and to tell your reader what they can expect to see in the work that follows. You may briefly point out overall trends in what has been published about the topic; gaps in research and scholarship. Establish your reason (point of view) for reviewing the literature and discuss the Aim: What is the objective of your work? This should be clear and concise.
2. Body: Typically contains a review of the topic; evaluation and analysis of existing knowledge; any areas of controversy that have appeared in the literature; limitations of previous literature; reasons for and purpose of the study being undertaken. This section is pivotal to the success of your work – it is here that your argument really unfolds, so use this space wisely and write as concisely as you can. Do not simply summarise results, but critically appraise the relevance and assumptions of the research findings you cite. In addition, synthesise information, themes, and findings from different sources based on what you have read rather than report each article separately.
3. Conclusion: Write a short paragraph to conclude your key findings. Summarise major contributions to the topic, maintaining the focus that you set out in your introduction. Identify gaps in the literature – where are the areas that are yet to be considered? Conclude with some insight into the relationship between the topic of interest and the literature that you have reviewed.
4. References: References must be included for all work cited, and APA 7th format MUST be followed.
This Medical Science Assignment has been solved by our Medical Science Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing Style. Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered.
You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turn tin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.