Area of Nursing Practice Identification of Problem and Impacts - Medical Science Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Task:

Introduction \

• Area of nursing practice (hereafter topic) identified.
• Identification of problem and impacts.
• NSQHS standard/s identified.
• Describes the scope of the paper. Rambling and unfocused or no introduction at all.
• Area of nursing practice not identified and/or problem and impacts not described. No NSQHS standard/s identified or incorrect standard identified.
• Scope of paper not described.
• (0-4.9 marks) Too long or too short. Basic introduction of area of nursing practice OR problem and impacts not identified. NSQHS standard/s identified, may be missing other standards.
• Scope of paper briefly described.
• (5-5.9 marks) Briefly, states area of nursing practice. Identification of problem and/or impacts. NSQHS standard/s identified.
• Scope of paper missing some key parts.
• (6-6.9 marks) Area of nursing practice and identification of problem and/or impacts introduced. NSQHS standard/s identified.
• Scope of paper described with some detail
• (7-7.9 marks) Comprehensive introduction of area of nursing practice and identification of problem and/or impacts introduced clearly. NSQHS standard/s identified.
• Completely describes the scope of the paper.
• (8-10 marks)
• Review of Literature (20 marks)
• Evaluate literature evidence for the topic identified in introduction.
• Discussion of extent of problem and causative issues.
• Discussion of potential solutions from the literature.
• Little or no evaluation of the literature evidence and/or causative factors and/or discussion of potential solutions.
• Most points lack credible, relevant or reliable evidence to support them.
• (0-9.9 marks) Basic evaluation of the literature evidence and/or causative factors and/or potential solutions.
• Some key points are supported by relevant, credible sources.
• (10-11.9 marks) Includes a mixed evaluation of the literature evidence and/or causative factors and/or potential solutions with some areas that are well thought out and others generic/inappropriate.
• All key points, and some additional ideas are supported by relevant, credible sources.
• (12-13.9 marks) Clear evaluation of the literature evidence and/or causative factors and/or potential solutions with some minor errors or omissions.
• Most points in the argument are informed by relevant, credible and reliable literature.
• (14-15.9 marks) Significant and detailed evaluation of the literature evidence and/or causative factors and/or potential solutions
• Effective use of a wide range of relevant, credible and reliable literature throughout.
• (16-20 marks)
• Discussion of quality improvement project (20 marks)
• Statement of QI project and discussion of solutions that will be implemented.
• Requirements to implement into practice.
• Key stakeholders
• Measurement of change.
• Impacts on staff and patients.
• Plan to sustain change. Statement of QI project not given or unclear. Minimal discussion given. Unclear what the QI project is.
• (0-9.9 marks) QI project mentioned in a superficial way with a lack of detail or description. Description rather than discussion in this section. Some elements missing or not described.
• (10-11.9 marks) QI project is stated. The discussion is lacking detail some areas. One or two elements superficial in description.
• (12-13.9 marks) QI project is clearly stated. The discussion is detailed with the elements described detail. Minimal areas needing improvement.
• (14-15.9 marks) Excellent discussion of QI project and the elements required for implementation. Clear demonstration of the elements required for the QI project.
• (16-20 marks)
• Policies, procedures and/or clinical practice guidelines (10 marks)
• Identification of relevant evidence based resources.
• Discussion of how these resources will be integrated. Does not identify if there any relevant evidence based resources and/or
• Does not discuss how the resources will be integrated.
• (0-4.9 marks) Presence of evidence based resources is indicated but discussion of integration of the resources is limited.
• (5-5.9 marks) Presence of evidence based resources is indicated. Discussion of integration of the resources has some links back to the chosen topic, but some detail missing.
• (6-6.9 marks) Presence of evidence based resources is indicated. Discussion of integration of the resources has clear links back to the chosen topic.
• (7-7.9 marks) Presence of evidence based resources is indicated. Detailed discussion of integration of the resources and clear links back to the chosen topic.
• (8-10 marks)
• Australian Safety and Quality Framework (10 marks)
• Apply to identified topic.
• Link to the three principals. Australian Safety and Quality Framework not mentioned and/or linking topic to the three principals not discussed.
• (0-4.9 marks) Topic applied to Australian Safety and Quality Framework but missing/or minimal linking of topic to all three principals.
• (5-5.9 marks) Topic applied to Australian Safety and Quality Framework. Links present to all three principals, with some areas not discussed in detail.
• (6-6.9 marks) Topic applied to Australian Safety and Quality Framework. Clearly establishes a links to all three principals.
• (7-7.9 marks) Topic applied to Australian Safety and Quality Framework. Significant discussion of the links to all three principals.
• (8-10 marks)
• Conclusion (10 marks)
• Main findings of paper summarised.
• Implications for improving quality and patient safety outcomes. Unclear/incomplete or inarticulate conclusion. Minimal discussion of findings and implications hardly considered.
• (0-4.9 marks) Conclusion does not summarise the main points. Basic discussion of findings or implications.
• (5-5.9 marks) Conclusion summarises some points discussed and mainly relates them to the chosen topic. Adequate discussion of findings
• (6-6.9 marks) Conclusion and summary of the main points in relation to the topic chosen. Clear discussion of findings
• (7-7.9 marks) Comprehensive conclusion that effectively summarises main points in relation to topic chosen. Comprehensive discussion of findings
• (8-10 marks)
• Referencing (10 Marks)
• Range of appropriate literature consulted.
• Currency and relevance of sources.
• Expression of the literature
• Adheres to APA 7th edition referencing guideline
• Either no evidence of literature being consulted and/or use of irrelevant sources.
• Sources are not current (> 7 years) and/or a very small number of academic sources used.
• Paraphrasing disorganised and/or a reliance on quoted material.
• Major errors in in?text citations and/or reference list.
• (0-4.9 marks) Poor selection of literature and/or integration of sources. Sources are current at times and/or small number of references included and/or reliance on textbooks/websites. Paraphrasing lacks clarity and/or several inappropriate direct quotations.
• Frequent errors in in?text citations and/or reference list.
• (5-5.9 marks) Basic selection of literature and/or integration of references with some irrelevant sources. Efforts made to include appropriate number of sources but includes some old or inappropriate sources. Some problems with paraphrasing and expressing ideas from the literature.
• Adheres to APA 7th edition referencing but with some errors.
• (6-6.9 marks) Appropriate selection and integration of academic sources. Appropriate number of quality sources.
• Primarily uses peer?reviewed journal articles to support discussion.
• Clear level of paraphrasing concepts from the literature in own words.
• Adheres to APA 7th edition reference style with infrequent (four to seven) minor errors.
• (7-7.9 marks) Comprehensive selection and integration of academic sources.
• Well developed and justified ideas based on a wide range of high quality evidence which is well integrated and discussed.
• Significant level of paraphrasing concepts from the literature. Adheres to APA 7th edition referencing style with less than three or no errors.

The above Medical Science Assignment has been solved by our  Medical Science Assignment  Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire considered worthy of the highest distinction.