Assessment Task : Risk assessment and Fallback Protection

Assignment Overview

Task Description

Understanding commercial contracts and being able to sensibly mitigate risks is vital for any manager or entrepreneur. Strong contract knowledge benefits the organisation by:

• Reducing time-consuming and costly referrals to internal or external lawyers.

• Ensuring that referrals are made only for genuine issues with significant organisational risk.

This assessment provides an opportunity for you to demonstrate your ability to apply laws and legal concepts covered in Topics 1–7.

Part A – Risk Mitigation (1500 words ±10%)

• Objective: Use the sample contract in Topic 7.5, or a de-identified contract from your own organisation.

• Context: Whether buying or selling on behalf of your organisation, the goal is to eliminate as many commercial contract risks as possible before signing, as it becomes difficult to amend contracts afterward.

Instructions:

1. State whether your organisation is buying or selling.

2. Select at least three clauses you would like to amend to reduce organisational risk. For each clause, address the following:

   • Reason for amendment: Why do you want to change this clause?

   • Proposed amendment: How would you like to amend it?

   • Risk assessment: Considering the contract as a whole, what are your chances of successfully reducing risk?

   • Fallback protection: How will you protect your organisation if you cannot fully or partially reduce the risk?

Part B – Interpretation (1500 words ±10%)

• Objective: Use the Topic 7.5 sample contract to demonstrate understanding of contractual rights, obligations, and interpretation of legal clauses, particularly boilerplate clauses.

Instructions:

(a) Key Words in Legal Documents (1000 words ±10%)

Identify and analyse examples of key words in the contract, and describe differences where multiple words appear:

• Means versus includes

• And versus or

• Will versus shall versus must

• Reasonable

(b) Contra Proferentem Rule (250 words ±10%)

• Explain the contra proferentem rule of construction using the sample contract.

• Describe how the buyer can protect itself against this rule.

(c) Erroneous Clause in Contract (250 words ±10%)

• Identify one clause that should have been deleted but was not.

• Explain why this clause should have been removed.

• Describe the risks associated with leaving accidental clauses in a contract.

Summary of Assessment Requirements

This assessment focuses on understanding commercial contracts and demonstrating the ability to mitigate risks effectively. It is designed for managers or entrepreneurs to show practical application of laws and legal concepts from Topics 1–7. The assessment consists of two main parts:

Part A – Risk Mitigation (1500 words ±10%)

Objective:

• Analyse a contract (sample from Topic 7.5 or a de-identified organisational contract) to minimise risks before signing.

Key Tasks:

1. Identify if your organisation is buying or selling.

2. Select at least three contract clauses to amend for risk reduction. For each clause, provide:

   • Reason for amendment: Why the change is necessary.

   • Proposed amendment: How the clause should be modified.

   • Risk assessment: Likelihood of successfully reducing risk.

   • Fallback protection: How to protect the organisation if full or partial amendments are not possible.

Purpose:

• Reduce unnecessary legal referrals.

• Focus on clauses that could pose significant organisational risk.

Part B – Contract Interpretation (1500 words ±10%)

Objective:

• Demonstrate understanding of contractual rights, obligations, and interpretation, particularly for boilerplate clauses.

Key Tasks:

(a) Key Words in Legal Documents (1000 words ±10%)

• Identify examples of key words and explain differences:

  • Means versus includes

  • And versus or

  • Will versus shall versus must

  • Reasonable

(b) Contra Proferentem Rule (250 words ±10%)

• Explain the contra proferentem rule using the sample contract.

• Describe how the buyer can protect itself against this rule.

(c) Erroneous Clause in Contract (250 words ±10%)

• Identify a clause that should have been deleted but was not.

• Explain why it should be removed.

• Discuss the risks of leaving accidental clauses in a contract.

Academic Mentor’s Step-by-Step Guidance

The Academic Mentor guided the student through the assessment in a structured, stepwise approach:

Step 1: Understanding the Assessment Brief

• Explained the objectives of both Part A and Part B.

• Emphasised the importance of risk mitigation and contract interpretation skills.

Outcome: Student clearly understood the purpose and expectations.

Step 2: Selecting a Contract

• Advised the student to either use the Topic 7.5 sample contract or a de-identified organisational contract.

• Highlighted the need to focus on clauses with potential legal and financial risk.

Outcome: Appropriate contract selected for detailed analysis.

Step 3: Clause Analysis and Risk Mitigation (Part A)

• Guided the student to identify three critical clauses.

• Discussed:

  • Why the clauses posed risk

  • How to propose amendments

  • How to assess likelihood of successful negotiation

  • Fallback strategies if amendments fail

Outcome: Clear, actionable analysis demonstrating practical risk mitigation strategies.

Step 4: Key Words and Interpretation (Part B – a)

• Explained the differences between legal terms (means/includes, and/or, will/shall/must, reasonable).

• Guided the student to give examples from the contract and explain the implications.

Outcome: Strong understanding of language nuances in contracts.

Step 5: Contra Proferentem Rule (Part B – b)

• Mentored the student to explain the rule and strategies for buyer protection.

Outcome: Demonstrated knowledge of contract interpretation and risk management.

Step 6: Erroneous Clause Identification (Part B – c)

• Helped the student identify a clause that should have been deleted.

• Discussed potential risks of leaving accidental clauses in the contract.

Outcome: Critical thinking applied to identify legal and organisational risks.

Final Outcome and Learning Objectives Achieved

• Completed a well-structured report analysing contract risks and interpretations.

• Applied legal concepts from Topics 1–7 in practical scenarios.

• Developed skills in:

  • Risk assessment and mitigation

  • Contract interpretation and drafting

  • Critical analysis of legal language and clauses

  • Organisational protection strategies

Achieve Academic Success with Expert Support

Looking for guidance on your assignment? You can download the sample solution provided here to understand the structure, format, and approach used by top-performing students. Important: This sample is for reference only submitting it as your own work can result in plagiarism issues and academic penalties.

If you want a completely original, plagiarism-free solution, our team of professional academic writers can create a custom assignment tailored to your requirements. Every solution is written from scratch, ensuring accuracy, clarity, and alignment with your assessment brief.

Why Choose a Fresh, Custom Assignment?

• 100% plagiarism-free, original content

• Tailored to your specific assessment brief

• Written by experienced academic writers

• Delivered on time and ready to submit

• Supports better grades while maintaining academic integrity

Plagiarism Disclaimer: The sample provided is only for reference. Always submit original work to stay safe and protect your academic record.

Take Action Now

Download Sample Solution   Order Fresh Assignment