Assumption Checking for Mixed Design Factorial ANOVA - Management Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Task:

Order Instructions
Assumption checking for mixed design factorial ANOVA (produce all of the relevant output showing this), conduct any variable transformations/reflections if necessary and write up the results of them if they wind up being used or not used and the reasons why they were used/not used, assess outliers (if there is any detected) and go through the same process in determining whether they need to be kept in or taken out and if so why/why not then report this in the write up
Provide relevant descriptive statistics (means for age and gender not necessary as I’ve already got that covered, instead other descriptive statistics are needed (perhaps shoot me a message if you’re unsure on what descriptive stats may be needed so we can figure it out together, cos I’m just not sure what I’ll need to report just yet but by chatting about what descriptive stats could be produced based on all the data I provide you with, we should be able to figure it out)
Generate Cronbach’s alpha statistics for each of the two scales (SPS and SIAS) and general reporting of the results of survey data (not much really needs to be covered apart from general stuff here such as correlations I believe, as you’ll see I’m not trying to create a new subscale or determine whether any items need to be removed from the subscale or create any norms or anything like that, it’s more that the results of the two scales just need to indicate whether each participant will either be classified as low or high on social anxiety as a result of conducting a median split, so please conduct any analyses that are necessary when assessing the results of survey data in this context such as descriptives and the Cronbach alpha scores for each scale) (also, when producing the cronbach’s alpha score for the SIAS scale, please use the three reverse scored items R_SIAS5, R_SIAS9, R_SIAS11 rather than SIAS5, SIAS9, and SIAS11) (also also, there is a filter item that was used to assess whether participants were paying attention during the completion of the survey and unfortunately there was one participant that incorrectly answered this question, the bastard, so please acknowledge this somewhere within your write up and within your analyses as well please, as this is unfortunately quite crucial (and bloody annoying, I know))
Complete a median split based on the survey results and categorise each of the participants as either high or low on social anxiety (dummy code them) (when working out whether a participant is either classified as low or high on social anxiety, if there are any questionable ones that could potentially be classified as both high or low on social anxiety (and I’m sure there could be some based on what I’ve seen with the results of some participants scoring highly on one scale but not so highly on the other), please provide adequate justification and reasoning in the write up as to why some of them were classified as either high or low given that they could’ve gone either way).
Address the hypotheses utilising the analyses that I’ve outlined in the honours research proposal document, such as simple effects analysis/interaction contrasts and assessing main effects and interactions (please be sure to use syntax when running all of the analyses and retain the syntax file with all of the syntax you used and provide a *description* outlining what each syntax code represents above each set of syntax coding data please, that way I can look at everything you’ve done and know precisely what you’ve done with each code of syntax data, plus this is info that I’ll need for submission of my final work as well) and produce all of the relevant write up and tables/figures accordingly.
Produce relevant tables and figures all at an APA 7 level standard according to what is necessary to be reported on (a figure showing the three-way interaction will be required, a table covering some descriptive statistics will probably be required as well, honestly not sure of what other tables or figures I’d need but I’d be happy to chat with you about possible tables or figures that could be produced for the write up of the analyses)
SPSS Version 27 required to be used
Please refer to variable view for information about each of the variables as I’ve provided appropriate label information so that you’re able to understand what each variable within the dataset represents.
Please ensure that a copy of the final dataset, final output with a copy of ALL of the relevant output (also including results of transformation/reflected variables, the assessment of outliers and the impact of them on the results as well, I mean literally EVERYTHING that’s relevant, so please generate this final output once you’ve completed everything so that way the final output that you produce doesn’t include any unnecessary info/multiple copies of the same info over and over again, if you know what I mean), and final syntax file with ALL of the relevant syntax coding and *descriptions* for each syntax coding as well so I can refer back to it to work out what you’ve done for myself as well.

The above Management  Assignment has been solved by our  Management Assignment  Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire considered worthy of the highest distinction.