Australia’s Counter-Terrorism Strategy Report Writing - Law Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Task:

This assessment requires students to argue for reform of Australia’s counter- terrorism strategy. Answering the question, ‘where next for Australia’s counter- terrorism efforts?’ students should either:

(a) Argue for the adoption of new tactics, strategies, or approaches,
(b) Argue for the cessation or retreat from established approaches,
(c) Suggest modifications to existing strategies, tactics, and policies of the Australian government (and its respective enforcement agencies), or
(d) A suitable and balanced mixture of the above.

Students should draw upon as much evidence, data, and scholarship as possible to justify their argument. Students are required to complete a 10-minute audio-visual presentation using either video, an audio recorded Prezi, or an audio recorded PowerPoint. It is possible that other presentation-capture platforms may be used, but consult with the Unit Chair to ensure the format is suitable for submission.

This assignment will examine your presentational skills in addition to your scholarship. You are required to create a cohesive 10 minute presentation that delivers a substantive argument in a concise, well-communicated format. It is a test of style, as well as substance. Communicating your argument clearly and convincingly is equally as important as the intellectual rigor of the position you will take.

In preparation, students should choose an issue of concern around Australia’s counter-terrorism strategy and target it for critique. This can be a legal issue, a policy approach, a contentious tactic, or general strategy. It can focus on any organization or agency involved with Australia’s broader counter-terrorism strategy: ASIO, ASD, AFP, local state police, the courts, prisons, the legislature, parliament (commonwealth and/or state), the Home Affairs ministry (Centre for Counter-Terrorism Coordination), academic research, Universities, think tanks, journalism, businesses, industries, technology companies, community groups, sporting organisations, the general public, activist organizations, and other non- governmental agencies - whomever is deemed relevant to wider counter-terrorism strategy.

The goal is to articulate how Australia’s counter-terrorism strategy should develop into the future: what are the good ideas worth pursuing? What are the bad ideas that need abandoning? Who should and who shouldn’t play an increased role in counter-terrorism efforts? Who should play a reduced role? What can specific organisations do better to improve Australia’s overall strategy? These questions and inquiries should be answered using scholarship and should draw upon international case studies, examples, or knowledge for comparative purposes where relevant.

This Law  Assignment has been solved by our Law  Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.