Bibliography on Mental Health Issue or Therapy, Develop Analytical Skills, Literature Review - Nursing Assignment Help

Assignment Task -                 
 

Assignment 1 Instructions
The aim of this assessment task is to produce an evaluative annotated bibliography which will inform and support your work with clients. An annotated bibliography provides a brief account (annotation) of the available research on a given topic. It is a list of research sources (bibliography) that includes concise descriptions and evaluations of each source.
More specifically, its purpose is to help you:
1- Learn about a particular mental health issue or therapy through critically reviewing the literature.
 1-Gain an overview of the main issues, arguments and research within your chosen topic.
 1-Reflect on what has already been discovered about your topic.
 1-Develop your analytical skills through deeper engagement with individual sources.
 Your annotated bibliography will focus on one mental health issue and one therapy which you will select from an approved list provided on Moodle. If there is a mental health issue that you would like to research but it is not on the list, please seek approval from your lecturer. Read all of the information provided below, including the criteria for a better understanding of the task. A video explaining the assignment, an FAQ and marking rubric will also be made available on Moodle. 

One of the challenges confronting counsellors today is the overwhelming wealth of information available. Not all of this information is valuable or reliable. In research relating to counselling, we find we have to continually evaluate information. Your judgement of the information you read may be based on the acceptability/credibility of the source of the publication. For example, anyone can publish on the web which does not make the
publication automatically worthwhile, whereas publication in a professional journal in which 'peer review' is part of the publication process, is considered more credible even though there still may be
flaws.

However, evaluating the worth or value on an article is more than just identifying if it is peer  reviewed. You need to consider how relevant and compelling the argument is in relation to other published research. This assessment requires you to adopt a critical perspective. This does not mean you need to be negative, but rather, be careful to weigh up the value and credibility of the arguments in relation to the other sources you have annotated. You need to be critical about the information you are reading in order to identify weaknesses in various propositions, to select what is useful to you in extending your current knowledge, to question some of what you already know, and to add new perspectives. You should be relating what you are reading to other concepts and theories.

In your research, you are required to identify 5 peer-reviewed journal articles and/or book chapters (from commercially published books) and write an annotated entry of approximately 600 words for
each of them (5 x 600 words). Include an introduction of 400 words (maximum) to explain the theme of, and rationale for your selection and a conclusion of 600 words (maximum) with your learning, reflections, implications and recommendations.

Your selections may be from journal articles and/or books. The aim of your annotation is to convey a sense of the worth of the information. A high-quality annotated bibliography will also demonstrate synthesis and evaluation of the source with that of other texts, research and theories. It is expected that some of your entries will directly compare the issues raised in one source with one or more
other sources. It is strongly recommended that you focus less on summarising the entire source but rather critically consider one or two relevant or important issues within the text.

Articles must be:

•  Peer-reviewed.
•  Full text.
•  Published within the last 10 years, preferably the last 5 years.
•  In the English language.
•  Use an appropriate research design (i.e., randomised control trial, pre-and post-intervention comparison).
•  Use either quantitative or qualitative data analysis.

Articles must not be:

•  Meta-analyses.
•  Literature reviews such as Systematic Reviews, Cochrane reviews, Narrative or traditional

reviews and Scoping reviews etc.

•  Letters.
•  Perspectives/editorials.
•  Synopses.

For each selected sources, it is important to consider the implications, applications to other contexts, and in light of other literature under review. Remember that you need to minimize the time taken in summarising the article and maximise the critical discussion of the article, in terms of findings, methods, etc. In a high-quality assignment, we would expect at least some of the entries to
be referring to each other, comparing findings or another aspect
1. Rationale and selection of articles.
2. Level of critical analytical discussion.
3. Cross referencing of the literature.
4. Ability to reflect on practical implications for counsellors 
5. Quality of academic literacy and referencing.

This Nursing Assignment has been solved by our Nursing Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.