BMG872: Global Strategy Development and Implementation Assessment

Assessment

Introduction

GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) is a leading British pharmaceutical company standing at the forefront of global healthcare. With its roots in the UK, GSK has grown into a multinational corporation, operating across over 100 countries (GSK, 2023). The company's focus spans pharmaceuticals, vaccines, and consumer healthcare products, serving millions of individuals worldwide. As of 2023, GSK had a workforce of around 70,000 employees and reported revenue of £30.3 billion (GSK, 2023). This global reach, coupled with a strong commitment to innovation and sustainability positions GSK as a key player shaping the healthcare market worldwide (GSK, 2023).

Competitive Rivalry (High)

GSK operates in the highly competitive pharmaceutical industry, characterised by rivalry from other large multinationals such as Pfizer, Merck, Johnson & Johnson, and Novartis. This environment requires a continuous cycle of innovation and substantial investment into research and development (R&D) to maintain market position (IQVIA Institute, 2022). As a result, GSK is forced to consistently innovate, particularly in therapeutic areas, such as vaccines, respiratory treatments, and longterm illness medications, in order to stay competitive (GSK Annual Report, 2023). Despite strong brand loyalty, GSK faces consistent pressure and must spend on BARGAINING POWER OF SUPPLIERS - Supplier diversity - Negotiating power - Specialised raw materials - Supply chain management - Vertical integration THREAT OF SUBSTITUTES - Generic drugs - Patent expiry - Alternative therapies - Biologics and biosimilars - Over-the-counter options COMPETITIVE RIVALRY - Major Competitors - Innovation Pressure - Market Share Battle - R&D Investments - Brand Loyalty BARGAINING POWER OF BUYERS - Healthcare providers and insurers - Price sensitivity - Drug pricing pressures - Product differentiation - Market access strategies THREAT OF NEW ENTRANTS - Regulatory barriers - High R&D costs - Brand loyalty - Distribution networks - Economies of scale Figure 1: Porter’s Five Forces applied to GSK (The Free PowerPoint Template Library, n.d.) extensive R&D to differentiate its products and capture new market segments (Lábaj et al., 2018). Maintaining consumer trust and market share is therefore both expensive and risky further underscoring the challenge for firms operating in the industry (Kapferer, 2020).

Threat of New Entrants

In the pharmaceutical industry, the threat of new entrants remains low to moderate, primarily due to the high regulatory barriers and substantial financial investment required for R&D and compliance. Agencies such as the FDA and EMA enforce stringent approval processes that deter potential competitors (DiMasi et al., 2016 ). Additionally, established companies like GSK benefit from strong brand loyalty and entrenched relationships with healthcare providers, further raising the barriers to entry (Kapferer, 2020). The substantial resources necessary for developing new drugs, combined with the complexities of navigating regulatory landscapes, therefore make it difficult for new entrants to compete. Consequently, while the threat of new entrants is present, it remains relatively low due to these significant obstacles (DiMasi et al., 2016).

Bargaining Power of Buyers (High)

The power of buyers is high in the pharmaceutical market, with significant pressure from healthcare providers, governments, and insurance companies (PWC Health Research Institute, 2023). These large buyers can exert substantial influence over drug pricing and availability, impacting GSK's pricing strategies. Additionally, the increasing price sensitivity among patients and healthcare providers, particularly in markets with low state healthcare coverage, further increases the bargaining power of buyers (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2022). To navigate this challenge, GSK must balance its pricing and market access strategies across different regions, ensuring it remains competitive while still achieving profitability. The company's ability to differentiate its products and justify its pricing is also a key consideration.

Summary of Assessment Requirements

The assessment required the student to prepare an Introduction section for an academic assignment analysing GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) using Porter’s Five Forces Framework. The introduction had to set the context for the organisation, explain its relevance, present the analytical focus, and outline the structure of the work. Specifically, the student needed to address:

Key Pointers to Be Covered

1. Introduce the organisation
   Provide background about GSK, its global presence, revenue, workforce, and strategic importance.

2. Contextualise the topic
   Highlight the relevance of analysing GSK’s competitive environment.

3. Present the analytical framework
   Introduce Porter’s Five Forces as the core strategic tool guiding the assessment.

4. Summarise key competitive factors
   Competitive Rivalry
   Threat of New Entrants
   Bargaining Power of Buyers
   Bargaining Power of Suppliers
   Threat of Substitutes

5. Connect to existing research
   Use credible academic and industry sources to validate claims.

6. Define the scope of the analysis
   Focus on GSK’s external environment and competitive pressures.

7. Provide a structural overview
   Brief description of how the analysis is organised in the following sections.

How the Academic Mentor Guided the Student (Step-by-Step Approach)

1. Clarifying the Purpose of the Assessment

The mentor first explained the objective of an Introduction section
to set the stage, provide context, and prepare the reader for the analytical discussion.
The student was guided to understand the difference between background, focus, and scope ensuring the introduction didn’t become descriptive without direction.

2. Helping the Student Gather Accurate Company Background

The mentor instructed the student to begin by identifying credible, recent data on GSK:

• Global presence
• Workforce size
• Revenue
• Strategic sectors (pharmaceuticals, vaccines, consumer health)
• This ensured the introduction started with strong factual grounding.

3. Defining the Analytical Lens (Porter’s Five Forces)

Next, the mentor explained how Porter’s Five Forces work and why the model is relevant for analysing GSK’s competitive environment.

• The student learned to clearly state the purpose of using this framework and link it to GSK’s operational challenges.

4. Teaching the Student to Integrate Sources

The mentor emphasised academic practice:

• Use up-to-date, relevant sources
• Cite academic models, industry reports, and research articles
• This helped the student introduce each force with evidence-backed insights.

5. Guiding the Breakdown of Each Force

The mentor then encouraged the student to summarise the key insights for each force in the introduction, without going into full detail. This ensured the reader understood the direction of the analysis.

6. Framing Scope and Boundaries

The student was coached to define what the assessment focuses on:

• External competitive forces
• Market structure
• fIndustry pressures
• And what it does not cover (e.g., internal organisational dynamics).
• This helped maintain clarity and academic precision.

7. Crafting the Overview of the Assessment Structure

Finally, the mentor helped the student add a short overview of how the following sections are organised.
This included stating that each of the Five Forces will be assessed individually, followed by an integrated conclusion.

Final Outcome

Through this guided process, the student successfully produced a clear, well-structured introduction that:

• Accurately introduced GSK with relevant data
• Explained the purpose and importance of the analysis
• Presented Porter’s Five Forces as the guiding framework
• Highlighted the role of competitive rivalry, buyer/supplier power, substitutes, and entry barriers
• Demonstrated academic understanding through proper referencing
• Provided a clear structural roadmap for the rest of the assessment

Learning Objectives Achieved

By the end of the activity, the student demonstrated the ability to:

1. Write a clear and academically appropriate introduction.
2. Use strategic analysis frameworks effectively.
3. Integrate academic and industry research to support arguments.
4. Define scope and structure in an academic assignment.
5. Summarise complex competitive factors concisely.
6. Follow academic conventions in presentation, referencing, and organisation.

Get Your Sample Solution for Guidance And Secure a Fresh Original Assignment

Need help understanding how to structure and present your academic work? Our sample solution is available for you to download and use as a reference to improve your understanding, strengthen your writing approach, and guide your research.
However, submitting this sample as your own work may result in plagiarism issues. The sample is meant strictly for reference, learning, and academic guidance only.

If you require a fully original, customised assignment written according to your exact brief, our expert academic writers are ready to help. Every fresh solution is crafted from scratch, thoroughly researched, accurately referenced, and delivered with a plagiarism report ensuring complete originality and academic integrity.

Why Choose a Fresh Custom Written Assignment?

• 100% original content tailored to your requirements
• Completely plagiarism-free with an authenticity check
• Structured and formatted according to academic guidelines
• Written by qualified subject specialists
• Reliable delivery within your deadline
• Confidential, professional, and student friendly service

Download the sample for reference or place an order for a fresh, customised assignment written exclusively for you.

Download Sample Solution                     Order Fresh Assignment