BN710 - Minimal Description of A Clinical Issue Essay - Medical Science Assignment Help

WEIGHT CATEGORY BEGINNING DEVELOPING SATISFACTORY ACCOMPLISHED EXEMPLARY MARK

Task 1  Clinical issue & question Minimal description of a clinical issue. Little or no explanation of how this impacts on nursing care of health consumers. PICO question is not identified. No supporting health professional literature included Superficial description of a clinical issue. Unfocused explanation of health outcomes/significance for nursing. Clinical question broad or not utilising PICO format. Minimal support from health prof literature Broad description of clinical issue. Generalised discussion of health outcomes/significance for nursing. Clinical question in PICO format broadly linked to clinical issue.
Health prof literature support evident Clinical issue clearly described & explanation of impact on health outcomes /significance for nursing. Clinical question in PICO format & linked to clinical issue
A range of supporting health prof literature included Comprehensive rationale for selected clinical issue, & linked to health outcomes/significance for nursing. Focused clinical question in PICO format reflecting clinical issue. Robust range of health prof literature support 0-7 8-9 10-11 12-14 15-20 20

Task 2  Evidence selection Less than 2 selected reports or not research based. Not linked to clinical issue or comment on usefulness of evidence absent. Little or no discussion on quality/robustness of the research selected. No supporting health prof literature X2 Research reports selected. Unfocused rationale for article selection/ minimal links to PICO question. Unfocused discussion on quality/relevance of selected research. Minimal support from health prof literature X2 research reports selected. Broadly linked to PICO question. Some discussion related to quality/relevance of selected research to clinical issue. Some health prof literature support used X2 research reports selected. Clear rational for selection & links to PICO question. Well-constructed discussion about quality/relevance of selected research to clinical issue. A range of supporting health prof literature utilised X2 research reports selected. Strong rationale for selection & clear links to PICO question. Robust discussion about quality/relevance of selected research to clinical issue. Strong support from a range of health prof literature 0-7 8-9 10-11 12 - 14 15-20 20

Task 3  Recommendations Recommendations are absent / less than 2 or do not address PICO question. No support from selected research Recommendations are not related to nursing practice/health outcomes or do not address PICO question. Minimal support from selected research
Recommendations for nursing practice are broadly related to PICO question/ health outcomes with some reference to selected research Two focused nursing practice recommendations related to PICO question/health outcomes. Support from selected research & other health prof literature included Two highly focused nursing practice recommendations with strong links to PICO question/health outcomes. Strong support from selected research & other health prof literature. 0-7 8-9 10-11 12-14 15-20 20

Task 4  Leadership, management & workplace culture Discussion related to the effect of leadership & management on the workplace culture & the introduction of Task 3 recommendations is absent or not linked to the clinical issue. No health prof literature included Unfocused or limited discussion related to the effect of leadership & management on the workplace culture & introducing Task 3 recommendations into clinical setting. Minimal support from health prof literature Generalised discussion of the effect of Leadership & management on workplace culture & introducing Task 3 recommendations into clinical setting. Support from health prof literature evident Focused discussion related to the effect of leadership & management on the workplace culture & introducing Task 3 recommendations into clinical setting. A range of health prof literature support included Highly focused discussion related to the effect of leadership & management on the workplace culture & introducing Task 3 recommendations into clinical setting. Strong support from a
range of health prof literature 0-5 6-7 7.5-8 9-11 12-15 15

Task 5  Importance of EBP Discussion related to the importance of EBP in professional nursing practice & responsibilities is absent or inadequate. No supporting NZ nursing sources Unfocused or limited discussion relating to the importance of EBP in professional nursing practice & responsibilities. Minimal support from NZ nursing sources. Generalised discussion with some links between EBP & professional nursing practice & responsibilities. Support from some NZ nursing sources. Focused discussion related to the importance of EBP in professional nursing practice & responsibilities A range of NZ & other nursing sources included Highly focused discussion related to the importance of EBP in nursing practice. Strong support from a range of NZ nursing & other sources included 0-7 8-9 10-11 12-14 15-20 20
5% Scholarly presentation Disjointed discussion development. Poor sentence & paragraph construction. Frequent grammatical & spelling errors. Frequent repeated errors in referencing technique Discussion development lacks logical flow. Some sentence, paragraph construction, grammatical, spelling & referencing technique errors Discussion flow is logical but ideas lack development. Few sentence, paragraph construction, grammar, spelling & referencing technique errors Discussion has logical flow. Sentences & paragraphs are well constructed. Minor errors in grammar & spelling &/or referencing technique Fluent discussion. Excellent sentence & paragraph construction. Excellent spelling, grammar & referencing technique 0-1.5 2 2.5 3-3.5 4-5 5

This (BN710) Medical Science Assignment has been solved by our Medical Science experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinctio.