Programme MSc Management Module Name Project Management Practice Student Reference Number (SRN) Report/Assignment Title Date of Submission Extension Confirmation Attach confirmation if received
I declare that I have read and understood BPP’s regulations on plagiarism and that this is my original work, researched, undertaken, completed, and submitted according to BPP School of Business requirements.
AI Tools Usage (if applicable):
☐ To review a draft
☐ To correct language errors
☐ Other (please describe) ______________________________
I have retained copies of all AI prompts and responses used and attached relevant evidence in the appendices.
I understand I may be required to participate in a viva voce regarding my assignment content, including concepts, theories, examples, and sources.
Word count (excluding contents, bibliography, appendices): ______ words
Student Signature: _____________________
Date: _____________________
By submitting this coursework, you agree to all rules and regulations of BPP regarding assessments and awards.
This coursework accounts for 100% of module marks.
Late submissions will not be marked.
Submissions must be via Turnitin online access only; other submission modes will not be accepted.
Word limit: 5,000 words (main body only). Submissions less than 5,000 words are acceptable.
Do not include your name or contact details; only SRN is required.
Minimum pass mark: 50% (out of 100).
Use Harvard Referencing throughout; unreferenced content is considered plagiarism.
BPP enforces strict authenticity rules; plagiarism or collusion is severely punished.
Use of AI tools is permitted only for reviewing drafts, correcting language errors, or as specified in the assessment brief.
Reference guide: BPP Harvard Referencing
Flagship sustainable development by Siemens, located at Royal Victoria Dock.
Designed by Wilkinson Eyre Architects, opened 2012.
Features green technologies: solar energy, rainwater harvesting, smart energy management.
First London building to receive BREEAM Outstanding and LEED Platinum certifications.
Repurposed in 2022 to house Greater London Authority’s City Hall.
Research Links:
The Crystal by Wilkinson Eyre Architects – Re-thinking The Future
The Crystal / Wilkinson Eyre Architects – ArchDaily
Townshend Landscape Architects – The Crystal, London
Choose a real-life engineering project from any industry or country.
Resources: World Bank Projects & Operations
Students must ensure:
Sufficient publicly available information.
Project aligns with learning outcomes.
Complexity matches student skill level.
You are acting as a specialist project management consultant and required to produce a 5,000-word management report analyzing the case study project.
Objective: Systematically analyse internal and external influences on project management practice and sustainability.
Guidelines:
Critically analyse influences on the organisation and project selection.
Evaluate sustainability considerations and recommend strategies.
Marking Criteria:
Critical appraisal, relevance to the case study, deep analysis.
Higher marks for evaluation answering how, why, what if, so what.
Objective: Critically analyse constraints and stakeholder engagement.
Guidelines:
Identify and evaluate project constraints.
Analyse stakeholders and propose engagement strategies.
Marking Criteria:
Critical evaluation of constraints and stakeholder management.
Evidence-based, specific to the case study.
Objective: Analyse risks and resources required for the project.
Guidelines:
Identify key risks and mitigation strategies.
Appraise and categorise resources; evaluate deployment challenges.
Marking Criteria:
Application of risk management theory and best practice.
Case-study specific, critical analysis.
Objective: Demonstrate leadership, conflict management, and project communication.
Guidelines:
Describe sources of conflict and propose resolution strategies.
Recommend project manager leadership strategies to improve success.
Marking Criteria:
Application of communication management theory and best practice.
Relevance to case study and critical evaluation.
Intellectual originality, integrity, and coherence must be demonstrated.
Professional academic standards and consistent formatting.
Tasks must be written in 3rd person academic style.
Page numbers in footer; tables/figures properly labelled.
Correct spelling, grammar, and Harvard referencing.
Sources must be cited in-text and in references.
Focus on critical evaluation, not mere description.
Provide evidence-based arguments from literature, case materials, and independent research.
Seek opposing views and present convincing evidence.
Align all tasks with module learning outcomes (LO1–LO4).
This formatting ensures:
Clear separation of cover sheet, assessment guidelines, and tasks.
Easy reference for students when preparing reports.
Professional appearance for academic submission.
The Project Management Practice assignment is a 5,000-word management report (100% of module marks) designed to develop students’ practical and analytical skills in project management. The assessment allows students to apply module concepts to a real-world or case study project, demonstrating competencies across four learning outcomes (LO1–LO4).
Key Pointers to Cover in the Assessment:
Task 1 (LO1) – Internal & External Influences:
Analyse organisational and project-specific internal and external influences.
Consider sustainability practices and recommend strategies.
Task 2 (LO2) – Complex Situations & Decision Making:
Evaluate project constraints and their impact.
Identify stakeholders and propose engagement strategies.
Task 3 (LO3) – Synthesise Information:
Identify project risks and mitigation measures.
Appraise resources required, deployment challenges, and management strategies.
Task 4 (LO4) – Communication & Leadership:
Examine conflict sources, propose resolution strategies.
Recommend leadership strategies to improve project success.
Report Structure:
Cover Page (BPP Coursework Cover Sheet)
Table of Contents
List of Abbreviations (if needed)
Introduction (100 words)
Tasks 1–4 (1,200 words each)
Conclusion (100 words)
References (Harvard style)
Appendices (if applicable)
Step 1 – Understanding the Assessment Brief:
Mentor reviewed BPP guidelines, word count, submission rules, and plagiarism policies.
Clarified the case study options (The Crystal, London or self-selected project).
Explained the importance of focusing on critical evaluation rather than description.
Step 2 – Research & Data Collection:
Students were guided to collect information from credible sources (e.g., case study websites, World Bank project documents, academic journals).
Emphasis was placed on valid, diverse sources for synthesising information in Tasks 3 & 4.
Step 3 – Task-by-Task Mentoring:
Task 1 (LO1):
Mentor demonstrated identifying internal (organisation structure, project team) and external factors (regulations, market conditions).
Guidance was provided on analysing sustainability strategies and linking them to project management principles.
Looking for guidance to complete your assignments effectively? You can download our sample solution to understand the structure, approach, and key concepts required. Please note, this sample is for reference only submitting it as your own work may result in plagiarism penalties. If you want a 100% original, plagiarism-free solution, our team of professional academic writers can craft a custom assignment tailored to your requirements, ensuring high-quality research, proper referencing, and adherence to your university guidelines. Ordering a fresh solution helps you:
Save time while maintaining academic integrity
Receive work aligned with your specific instructions and grading criteria
Understand complex topics through well-structured, clear explanations
Disclaimer: The sample solution is provided for reference purposes only. Copying or submitting it as your own may be considered academic misconduct.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.