BSS054-6 - Risk and Procurement Management - Report Writing - Management Assignment Help

Download Solution Order New Solution
Assignment Task
 

Q1

Identify a detailed bespoke state of the art procurement process for the work package from the general stages of a procurement process.
In particular detail three stages and methods of a bespoke procurement process. For example, a procurement stage might be solicitation, or a procurement method is Make or Buy. Critically examine the procurement process and methods for the chosen work package.
Identify challenges and state of the art methods within the case study you have developed.
How is risk managed by the bespoke procurement process and methods you have developed?
Comment on the detail of your procurement process and methods. Is the detail you have provided sufficient and why?

Q2
Using the literature, compare and contrast two different types of contractor and form of collaboration for the work package discussed in Question 1.
For example, strategic or bottleneck suppliers.
Develop a prototype contract for the case study scenario and justify the terms and conditions. How do the terms and conditions manage risk in detail?

Q3
Identify four types of contract breach that may occur in your contract using examples from the literature and how they might be resolved.
Note: Introduction and conclusion should be 300 words in total
The report will be 3000 words in length (not including references and appendices). It should include answers to all the questions (given above) and should use relevant procurement management theories and concepts. Your first submission is the final.
What do I need to do to pass? (Threshold Expectations from UIF)
Demonstrate engagement with the literature
Use appropriate procurement tools and techniques as outlined in the unit to analyse a Case Study.
Give some constructive recommendations appropriate to present to senior managers about procurement contracts.
How do I produce high quality work that merits a good grade?
We will be filling this section in together in class on Click or tap to enter a date. make sure you have downloaded/printed out the Assignment Brief and bring it to the session with you.How does assignment relate to what we are doing in scheduled sessions?
You will need to apply the concepts and models covered in class regarding a multi-stage procurement management process applied to a case study which is hypothetical and informed by the literature. You will be needed to refine your understanding of the procurement processes, methods; and types of contract and collaboration; and also, terms and conditions in contracts during class exercises and discussions and demonstrate this in your written report.
607060190500-25406350000
How will my assignment be marked?
Your assignment will be marked according to the threshold expectations and the criteria on the following page.
You can use them to evaluate your own work and consider your grade before you submit.
3rd Class – 40-49%
Lower 2nd – 50-59%
Upper 2nd – 60-69%
1st Class – 70%+
40% Only 1 method identified in detail. The procurement process is insufficiently described for the specific work package. The critical analysis is satisfactory.
Partial or minimal identification of risk management through procurement Some critical analysis of the challenges and state of the art methods.
Some of the main features of the procurement process are described for the specific work package.
Some of the challenges and state of the art methods are identified to a satisfactory quality.
Some of the risk is explained Supported by good amount and quality of evidence.
Good critical analysis of the challenges and state of the art methods.
Procurement process is described with the main features identified for the specific work package.
Good explanation of risk Three methods identified for the work package. Procurement process described in relation to the specific work package. Challenges and state of the art methods involved in a comprehensive critical analysis of the procurement process and the three methods using strong evidence and high-quality academic sources.
Risk is comprehensively explained using the literature
25% Different types of collaboration and contractor are described but discussion lacks evidence. Discussion narrow and possibly not well argued or supported.
Minimal definition in the contract and link to risk is vague.
Different types of collaboration and contractor are described. An ability to use ideas which are easily accessible. No evidence of a student’s attempt to go beyond the obvious. Discussion accurate but shallow.
Some terms and conditions are identified but not explained. The link to risk is weak. A good understanding of different types of collaboration and contractor are considered, supported by evidence.
A good number of terms and conditions are explained and linked to risk A comprehensive answer that shows a sound evaluation of the collaboration and contractor, supported by evidence and appropriate examples.
A detailed contract is developed and risk is fully explained.
25% Three contract breaches and resolutions are described but discussion lacks evidence. Discussion narrow and possibly not well argued or supported.
Four contract breaches and resolutions are described. An ability to use ideas which are easily accessible. No evidence of attempt to go beyond the obvious. Discussion accurate but shallow. A good understanding of at least four contract breaches and resolutions of the case considered, supported by evidence.
A comprehensive answer that shows a sound evaluation of at least four contract breaches and resolutions supported by evidence and appropriate examples.
10% Structure and presentation of the report is satisfactory.
Readability is acceptable, though some grammar.
Harvard reference format used correctly; referencing is limited. Good report structure and presentation.
Some referencing is used to support discussion. A good logical structure is evident.
Presentation of the report and readability are very good.
Good references are used to support the discussion. A well-structured report, where the arguments are presented in a logical order.
Professional presentation with excellent readability.
Wide range of high-quality references to support the discussion.

 

This BSS054-6 - Management Assignment has been solved by our Management experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.

Get It Done! Today

Country
Applicable Time Zone is AEST [Sydney, NSW] (GMT+11)
+

Every Assignment. Every Solution. Instantly. Deadline Ahead? Grab Your Sample Now.