Highlights
Question
1. A credit card company wants to run an OLS regression to explain variations over time in the use of their cards. They have data on a number of variables for 216 weeks. The regression output is as follows:
The regression variables are defined as follows:
USE is the number of times the cards were used each week.
AD is the company’s weekly advertising expenditure in thousand £.
INT is the rate of interest charged on their cards measured in per cent (%).
EXP is the aggregate weekly consumer expenditure for the UK in thousand £.
ADC is the weekly advertising expenditure of their principal competitor in thousand £.
(a) Interpret and comment on these results. Please explain in detail and make use of all information available to you.
(b) The company believes that card use is higher in July and August due to holiday spending patterns. Explain how you might adapt the model to test for this. What results would this new model need to yield to support the company’s belief?
(c) What changes (if any) to the specification of the model would you make and why? Please make use of all information available to you.
(d) Why might multicollinearity be a problem in this model and how would you test for it? Explain how the tests you propose would help determine the presence or absence of problematic multicollinearity.
2. Dr Görtz is a labour economist who is interested in explaining why people work in the UK manufacturing industry. He intends to estimate the following equation
3. The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of a company wishes to understand the factors that determine CEO salaries. He asks his research analyst to survey 177 CEOs and collect data on a number of variables. The data are then used to run an OLS regression, with the results given below:
4. The World Food Programme (WFP) usually supplies potatoes to war-torn countries in South Asia. The organisation has decided to invest into the cultivation of the crop. To help them understand the relationship between potato crop output and inputs, the WFP have collected a balanced panel data from 44 different farmers over a period (1990-1997).
The WFP economist decided to run three different estimations based on three different model specifications. Table 1 presents the summary of the estimation results from the model above:
Table 1: Regression Output Summarised
|
Variable |
Pooled Model (1) |
Fixed Effect Model (Within Estimation) (2) |
Random Effect Model (3) |
|
Constant |
-1.5468 (0.2557) |
-0.3352 (0.3263) |
-1.0186 (0.2704) |
|
LnArea |
0.3617 (0.0640) |
0.5841 (0.0802) |
0.4860 (0.0675) |
|
LnLabour |
0.4328 (0.06689) |
0.2586 (0.0703) |
0.3526 (0.0658) |
|
LnFert |
0.2095 (0.0383) |
0.0952 (0.0432) |
0.1609 (0.0388) |
|
Sample Size (n) R2/overall R2 Corr (ui, xb)
|
X 0.85 -
|
X 0.84 0.269
|
X 0.85 0 (assumed) |
This BUSI4434 – Management has been solved by our PHD Experts at My Uni Paper.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.