BUSS 1004.1: Business Law - The Key Features of the Judicial System of Oman - Business Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Module Learning Outcomes: 

The following LOs are achieved by the student by completing the assignment successfully

1. Critically analyse the implications of national and international legal environments of businesses in the Sultanate of Oman. 

2. Analyse the key features of the judicial system of Oman. 

Assignment Objective 

The aim and the objective of assignment to test the level of understanding of the module with respect  to the given learning outcomes and also measure the learning thorough assessing the questions/cases of  the assignment. 

Assignment Tasks 

This is an individual project report accounting for 50% of the overall 100 marks. You are required to  prepare an individual report answering all the following questionsin the context of Oman with  relevantjustification with proper citation and references. 

I. Submit a work proposal for this assignment on or before 28/10/2020 (23:59) which must include: 

• Understanding of deliverables – a detail description of deliverables.  
• General overview of proposed plan - initial understanding of solution to task2. 
• Timeline for completion of the given tasks. 
• The work proposal must be submitted in a word file through the link available in Moodle. (10 Marks, word count 150 words) 

II. Task 2(90 Marks) 

Q1. Examine the impact of international environmental factors on business environment in the Sultanate of Oman with a special emphasis on Legal factors with relevant  information. 

Q2. Explain in detail about the registration of commercial companies (SAOC and SAOG) in detail   along with its operational rules and regulations.

Q3. Discuss in detail about terms and conditions of contracts, breach of contract, termination  of contracts and discharge of contracts with relevant examples.  

Q4. Elucidate in detail about the Oman legal and judicial system and its objectives quoting relevant  Royal Decree. (25 Marks, word count: 350 words). 

Rules & Regulations: 

• Total assignment word count (1400). Plus/ Minus 10% of word count acceptable.
• All resources should be cited using CU Harvard style. 
• The final assignment must have a Title page, Table of Contents, References/ bibliography using  CU Harvard Style and page numbers. 
• Title Page must have Assignment Name, Module name,Session, your name, ID, and the name of  the faculty.  
• Softcopy in word format is to be submitted through Turnitin link on Moodle.
• Upon discretion of the faculty, student may be called for the VIVA-VOCE. Failing to appear for  VIVA or to respond to the questions asked during the VIVA may lead to a failing mark in the assessment.

Important Policies to be followed 

1. Student Academic Integrity Policy:  

MEC upholds the spirit of academic integrity in all forms of academic work and any form of violation  of academic integrity shall invite severe penalty. Any benefit obtained by indulging in the act of  violation of academic integrity shall be cancelled. 

All cases of violation of academic integrity on the part of the student shall fall under any of the  below mentioned categories:  

1. Plagiarism  

2. Malpractice 

3. Ghost Writing 

4. Collusion  

5. Other cases  

If the student fails a module and has a proven case of academic integrity violation in this module,  the student is required to re-register the module. This is applicable to first and second offenders of  plagiarism.  

1. Plagiarism 

A. First offence of plagiarism 

I. If a student is caught first time in an act of plagiarism during his/her course of study in  any assignment other than project work, the student will be allowed to re-submit the  assignment once, within a maximum period of one week. However, a penalty of  deduction of 25% of the marks obtained for the resubmitted work will be imposed.  

II. Period of re-submission: The student will have to re-submit the work one week from the  date he or she is advised to re-submit.  

III. If the re-submitted work is also found to be plagiarized, then that assessment will be  awarded a zero mark. Re-submission of the work beyond the maximum period of one  week will not be accepted and the assessment will be awarded a zero mark.  

B. Second offence of plagiarism 

If any student is caught a second time in an act of plagiarism during his/her course of study (in a  subsequent semester), the student will directly be awarded zero for the work in which  plagiarism is detected. In such cases, the student will not be allowed to resubmit the work. A  warning of suspension shall be issued, and student has to sign an undertaking and undergo  counselling session in such cases. 

2. Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion 

A. First offence of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion 

If a student is caught in an act of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion for an assessment  component irrespective of coursework or end semester, the student shall fail the  module and shall be required to re-register the module 

B. Second Offence of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion 

If a student is caught a second time in an act of Malpractice/Ghostwriting/Collusion for  an assessment component irrespective of coursework or end semester, the student shall fail the module. A warning of suspension shall be issued, and student has to sign  an undertaking and undergo counselling session in such cases. 

3. Third Offence of Academic Integrity Violation 

If a student is caught a third time in an act of Academic Integrity Violation for an assessment  component irrespective of coursework or end semester (in a subsequent semester), the student  shall fail the module and also shall be suspended for one semester from the College, as  recommended by institutional level academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean,  Academic Affairs.  

4. Fourth Offence of Academic Integrity Violation: 

If a student is caught a fourth time in an act of Academic Integrity Violation for an assessment  component irrespective of coursework or end semester (in a subsequent semester), the student  shall fail the module and also shall be expelled from the College, as recommended by institutional  level academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs. 

5. Other cases 

If a student commits an act of academic integrity violation as per the definition of “other cases”  mentioned in the previous section or of a different nature, student’s case shall be forwarded to an  institutional level academic committee, Chaired by the Associate Dean, Academic Affairs. The  committee shall investigate the case by means of a viva and/or a disciplinary hearing and shall take  appropriate decision. The penalty that can be granted to a proven case of academic integrity  violation which falls in this category of “other cases” can be a warning/component zero/ module  fail/suspension/expulsion depending on the nature and gravity of the offence. 

6. Types/Variations of Cases: 

I. If plagiarism is detected in any component of one assessment, the deduction in marks will be  applicable for the whole assessment, even if only the component or part submission alone  needs to be resubmitted.  

II. If plagiarism is detected in a group assessment, all students of the group will be considered as  having committed an act of plagiarism and the policy will then be applied to all students 

III. If plagiarism is detected in any component of a group assessment, the deduction in marks will  be applicable for the whole assessment even if only the component or part submission alone needs to be resubmitted.  

All students of the group would be considered as havingcommitted an act of plagiarism and the  policy will then beapplied to all the students of the group.  

IV. If the assessment consists of components or part submissions that could be a group assessment  component (e.g. group assignment) and an individual assessment component (e.g. individual  reflection), the following will be applicable:  

a. If plagiarism is detected in the group assessment component, all students of the group  will be considered as having committed an act of plagiarism, The policy will then be applied to all students of the group. Group assessment component will be resubmitted  as per the policy.  

b. If plagiarism is detected in the individual assessment component, the individual  assessment component will be resubmitted and the policy will then be applied to that  student alone.  

c. For both (a) and/or (b), the deduction in marks will be applicable for the whole  assessment.  

2. Late Submission Regulations: 

It is the students’ responsibility to check all relevant timelines related to assessments. 

As per the Assessment Policy at MEC, late submissions are allowed for one week (5 working  days) for all UG modules with a penalty. In such cases, a deduction of 5% of the marks obtained  for the submitted work shall be imposed for each working day following the last date of  submission till the date of actual submission. Assessment documents submitted beyond a  period of one week (5 working days) after the last date of submission will not be accepted and  will be awarded a zero for that assessment. In cases where the submission has been delayed  due to extenuating circumstances, the student may be permitted to submit the work without  imposing the late submission policy stated above. The extended period of submission will be  one week from the original last date of submission. In such cases, the student is expected to  submit the supporting certificates on or before the original last date of submission of the  assessment and the decision of extension rests with faculty responsible for the assessment .The  late submission policy shall be applied if the student fails to submit the work within one week of  the original last date of submission. 

Students may contact their teachers for clarification on specific details of the submission time if required. 

3. Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy 

To protect and respect the rights, dignity, health, safety, and privacy of research subjects  involved including the welfare of animals and the integrity of environment, all student projects  are expected to be undertaken as per the MEC Research Ethics and Biosafety Policy. Accordingly  the following shall apply. 

• Research and other enterprise activities shall be conducted by maintaining the high ethical  standards consistent with national and international standards and conventions. 
• Any research at MEC that is categorized as high-risk research shall be subject to review and  approval by the Research Ethics and Biosafety Committee.
• Research activities involving collection of human or animal tissues and manipulation of  microbial, animal or plant cells shall be subject to review and approval by the Research Ethics  and Biosafety Committee. 
• Participants involved in research must be informed about the purpose of research and intended  uses of research findings. Written consent must be obtained from people involved prior to the  commencement of research. 
• Data obtained from participants must be treated with high confidence and should be used only  for the intended purpose of research. 

Assessment Evaluation Criteria

This BUSS 1004.1: Business Assignment has been solved by our Business Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.