Child and Family Nursing Practice Helena Breast Cancer Case Study - Nursing Assignment Help

Assignment Task

 Child and Family Nursing Practice

• Written assignment: “Nursing Process applied to a Family”
• Word Count: 1500 words. Weighting: 40 % Marks 40
• The aim of this written assessment item is to apply the nursing process in providing family centred care. When individuals experience a health or social issue, the issue can impact upon all members of the family. Nurses working in acute care and community settings need to understand the functioning of the family unit so they can care for and assist the whole family.
• This written assignment addresses course learning outcomes 2 and 3:
• Demonstrate an understanding of the functioning of the family unit using family assessment models that enable families to make health decisions;
• Plan and evaluate evidence-based nursing for families across the lifespan.
• Task Description:
• Read the attached case study and watch the linked video
• From the ‘identified issues’ section of the case study select ONE issue for the family or a member of the family.
• Write a 1500 word structured essay in which you apply the nursing process to provide care for a family in a case study.
• Your essay must be structured using the following headings, noting suggested word counts:
• Introduction (125 words)
• Introduce the topic and explain the purpose and structure of the essay.
• Describe the issue (200 words)
• Describe the issue and discuss what is known about the issue/challenge, using evidence
• from scholarly literature
• (Why is this considered an issue?/ Is it a common issue?/ What may happen if the issue remains unresolved?)
• Plan nursing care (200 words)
• Propose a relevant nursing goal and justify with reference to a family assessment model (explain why it is relevant to the issue) and appropriate evidence.
• (Justification of the goal is needed/ How is the goal linked to the issue?/ Is the Goal Evidence Based? Avoid your own opinion).
• Implement nursing care (500 words)
• Discuss two evidence-based nursing strategies for assisting the family to identify family strengths that will help them to achieve this goal.
• Outline a recommendation for an existing online resource or appropriate referral for the family for EACH nursing strategy.
• Evaluate nursing care (350 words)
• Propose an evidence-based evaluation of the strategy to meet the nursing care goals. Specifically explain how the strategy can be evaluated by the nurse.
• Conclusion (125 words)
• Conclude the assignment with a clear and well-articulated summation of the main points
• Other Elements:
• Do not include a Griffith University cover page at the start of your assignment. The School of Nursing uses an Electronic Cover Sheet quiz, on your course site.
• Refer to the Griffith Health Writing and Referencing Guide for guidance on writing, and referencing according to APA 7th style, as well as formatting and presentation including an appropriate Title page
• Ensure that you use at least 10 different sources of relevant scholarly literature1 (digitised readings, research articles, relevant Government reports and textbooks) that has been published within the last seven (7) years. If you use literature older than 7 years, you will need to justify why you are not using recent literature. Please note it is preferable to locate and use Australian sources if you are describing the extent or magnitude of the issue.
• Use academic language2 throughout and write in the third person.
• Refer to the marking criteria when writing your assignment. This will assist you in calculating the weightings of the sections for your assignment.
• State your word count (excluding title page and reference list) on your assignment title page. Word limits for assessment items need to be strictly adhered to. The word limit for an assessment includes in-text citations, tables, and quotations. The word limit DOES NOT include the reference list. Please note the marker will cease marking your submitted work once they have reached the allocated Total word limit.
• Maintain academic integrity.
• Submit a draft assignment via Turnitin and check your Turnitin report (allow up to 24 hours for report generation). If you need more information about Turnitin, make use of the online resourcesSubmit your assignment as a Word document (not a PDF) via Turnitin as per the instructions on the 2810NRS Learning@Griffith course site
• Keep your Turnitin receipt as a record of successful submission (an on-screen receipt will be displayed after submission which you should take a screen shot of)
• Information on Turnitin for students: https://intranet.secure.griffith.edu.au/computing/using- learning-at-griffith/students/assessment/turnitin8108959906000
• 1Some papers are of central importance to a research topic, often because they report a major breakthrough, insight, or a new and generative synthesis of ideas. This kind of paper may describe a study that changes our understanding of a topic or describes and illustrates a new and highly useful research method. These kinds of articles are often referred to as seminal or classic papers.
• 2 Everyday language is predominantly subjective. It is mainly used to express opinions based on personal preference or belief rather than evidence. Written academic English is formal. It avoids colloquialisms and slang, which may be subject to local and social variations. Formal language is more precise and stable, and therefore more suitable for the expression of complex ideas and the development of reasoned arguments.
• Case Study
• Helena is a 42-year old woman diagnosed with breast cancer who lives in rural Queensland with her husband Stefan and three children [Jane 15, Tom 12, Lucy 10]. Stefan works away and they struggle with her treatment and her need to be closer to hospital. They share family concerns with you about coping and maintaining support for the children.
• Please watch the video and read the transcript (in the assessment folder) for full details in preparation for your assessment. Oncology Family assessment https://youtu.be/LDl0FRbiAzcBackground
• Helena had a total mastectomy and removal of axillary nodes 10 weeks ago and is now receiving chemotherapy. Her treatment involves six cycles of chemotherapy, which comprises two days of treatment followed by two weeks for recovery. During the treatment weeks, Helena stays for the two days at the Cancer Council hostel close to the treating hospital. After her third cycle of chemotherapy, Helena returns home and notices a marked increase in her level of fatigue and is finding it very hard to cope with family demands.
• Helena subsequently contracts a common cold from one of her children and she becomes quite unwell. She goes to the emergency department of her local hospital, febrile and generally unwell. In view of her complex underlying medical condition, the doctor recommends Helena be transferred to the treating hospital’s oncology unit for further assessment and treatment. Helena is transferred to Brisbane via an air evacuation with Stefan. The children are left in the care of a close friend. Helena’s Mother and Father live in Brisbane.
• Assessment
• Helena is admitted to the oncology unit for treatment and assessment of her neutropenia. The nurse completes a family assessment to identify how the family is functioning with this immediate illness and Helena’s breast cancer diagnosis and treatment regime, and to see if any additional support or assistance is needed.
• Identified issues
• Poor communication between family members
• Limited understanding of the treatment
• Challenges with changes in family roles
• Different coping strategies across family members
• 4
• 2810 NRS Child and Family Nursing Practice Trimester 2, 2021: A2 Written Essay: Marking Rubric
• Assessable Elements EXEMPLARY
• Exceptionally high quality of performance or standard of learning achievement. ACCOMPLISHED
• High quality performance or standard of learning achievement. SOUND
• Consistent quality of performance or standard of learning achievement. DEVELOPING
• Satisfactory quality of performance or standard of learning achievement. BEGINNING
• Unsatisfactory quality of performance or standard of learning achievement. NOT ACHIEVED
• OR ATTEMPTED TOTAL MARK
• Criterion One Introduction and Conclusion Exceptionally high standard as evidenced by clear and well-articulated introduction of topic and explanation of the purpose and structure of the essay. Conclusion provides clear and well-articulated summation of the main points of the assignment High standard as evidenced by an accurate introduction of topic and clear explanation of the purpose and structure of the essay.
• Conclusion provides well- presented summation of the main points of the assignment. Minor errors evident. Sound standard as evidenced by a clear introduction of the topic and adequate explanation of the purpose and structure of the essay.
• Conclusion provides adequate summation of the main points of the assignment.
• Several errors evident. Satisfactory standard as evidenced by an adequate introduction of the topic and satisfactory explanation of the purpose and structure of the essay
• Sufficient summation of the main points of the assignment
• Numerous errors evident Unsatisfactory standard as evidenced by a flawed or limited introduction of the topic with nil or limited explanation of the purpose and structure of the essay.
• Inadequate summation of the main points of the assignment. Many errors or omissions evident. Mark allocation 4 3 2.5 2 1 0 Criterion Two Describe the issue Exceptionally high standard as evidenced by clear and comprehensive description of a range of factors related to the issue Succinct and logical discussion about what is known about identified issue and how this might be applicable to this case. High standard as evidenced by clear description of some factors related to the identified issue and a logical discussion of what is known about the identified issue, with some reference to the case. Sound standard as evidenced by an appropriate description of identified issue and related factors.
• Mostly logical discussion of what is known about the identified issue but may not link adequately to the case. Satisfactory standard as evidenced by an adequate description of identified issue but not all related factors are identified.
• Brief but sufficient discussion of what is known about identified issue but not sufficient reference to how it applies to the case. Some errors related to information accuracy are
• evident. Unsatisfactory standard as evidenced by a flawed or limited description of the identified issue and no inclusion of related factors. Underdeveloped or inaccurate discussion of what is known about the identified issue with no reference to the case.
• Many errors or omissions
• evident. Mark allocation 5 4 3 2.5 2-1 0 Criterion Three
• Plan nursing Care Exceptionally high standard as evidenced by very well constructed and highly relevant nursing goal.
• Comprehensive justification for the goal using components of a Family Assessment model. High standard as evidenced by well constructed and relevant nursing goal.
• Clear and concise justification for the goal, clearly linked to
• components of a Family Assessment model. Sound standard as evidenced by a clearly constructed and relevant nursing goal.
• Justification for the goal with some links to a Family Assessment model. Satisfactory standard as evidenced by an adequate nursing goal.
• Some justification for the goal but lacks detail
• Attempt at linking to a Family Assessment model. Unsatisfactory standard as evidenced by flawed or poorly constructed nursing goal with minimal relevance to issue or Linkage to a Family Assessment model No/Minimal justification of
• the goal. Mark allocation 5 4 3 2.5 2-1 0 Assessable Elements EXEMPLARY
• Exceptionally high quality of performance or standard of learning achievement. ACCOMPLISHED
• High quality performance or standard of learning achievement. SOUND
• Consistent quality of performance or standard of learning achievement. DEVELOPING
• Satisfactory quality of performance or standard of learning achievement. BEGINNING
• Unsatisfactory quality of performance or standard of learning achievement. NOT ACHIEVED
• OR ATTEMPTED TOTAL MARK
• Criterion Four Implement nursing care Exceptionally high standard as evidenced by a succinct and accurate discussion of two evidence based strategies that align with family strengths.
• Recommends highly relevant and accessible online resource/s and/or referral for each strategy. High standard as evidenced by a well- constructed discussion of two evidence based strategies that align with family strengths Recommends relevant online resource/s and/or referral for each strategy. Minor errors evident. Sound standard as evidenced by an accurate discussion of two strategies that align somewhat with family strengths, but may emphasise some things inappropriately. Recommends some relevant online resource/s and/or referral for each strategy.
• Several errors evident. Satisfactory standard as evidenced by basic discussion of two strategies, but they may not be well supported by literature.
• Sound attempt at recommending appropriate online resource/s and/or referral for each strategy; Numerous errors evident. Unsatisfactory standard as evidenced by a limited or inadequate discussion of strategies.
• Chosen strategies not appropriate for previously discussed goal and could not be implemented in practice. Inappropriate recommendations for online resource or referral.
• Many errors evident. Mark allocation 10 9-8 7-6 5 4-1 0 Criterion Five Evaluate nursing care Exceptionally high standard as evidenced by clear, and comprehensive discussion of proposed method/s to evaluate both strategies used to meet the goal. High standard as evidenced by concise discussion of a proposed method to evaluate both strategies used to meet the goal. Minor errors or omissions evident. Sound standard as evidenced by a discussion of of a proposed method to evaluate Both strategies used to meet the goal.
• Several errors or omissions evident. Satisfactory standard as evidenced by proposal of a suitable method to evaluate the strategies used to meet the goal but lacks detail.
• Numerous errors or omissions evident. Unsatisfactory standard as evidenced by proposal of an inappropriate or insufficient method to evaluate the strategies used to meet the goal; Many errors or omissions evident 6 5 4 3 2-1 0 Criterion Six Presentation grammar, and academic writing Exemplary demonstration of academic writing standards and adherence to assignment presentation formatting guidelines.
• Exemplary sentence and paragraph structure, with very few errors. Exemplary overall logical flow, indicating a sophisticated ability to communicate ideas effectively. Accurate use of recommended section headings and adherence to word limit. High standard demonstration of academic writing standards and adherence to assignment presentation formatting guidelines.
• Appropriate sentence and paragraph structure, and overall logical flow, indicating effective ability to communicate ideas effectively. Accurate use of recommended section headings and adherence
• to word limit. Consistent attempt to comply with academic writing standards and conform to assignment presentation formatting guidelines.
• Mostly correct sentence and paragraph structure, with some errors that disrupt the logical flow or communication of ideas.
• Section headings not used as suggested or under/over word limit. Some attempt to comply with academic writing standards and conform to the assignment presentation formatting guidelines.
• Developing sentence and paragraph structure, and/or there are some errors that disrupt the logical flow or communication of ideas; Section headings absent or under/over word limit; Numerous errors evident Does not comply with academic writing standards.
• Poor sentence and paragraph structure, and poor logical flow demonstrates an inability to communicate ideas effectively.
• Section headings absent or
• under/over word limit.
• Many errors evident. Mark allocation 5 4 3 2.5 2-1 0 5
• Assessable Elements EXEMPLARY
• Exceptionally high quality of performance or standard of learning achievement. ACCOMPLISHED
• High quality performance or standard of learning achievement. SOUND
• Consistent quality of performance or standard of learning achievement. DEVELOPING
• Satisfactory quality of performance or standard of learning achievement. BEGINNING
• Unsatisfactory quality of performance or standard of learning achievement. NOT ACHIEVED

This Nursing Assignment has been solved by our Nursing Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
    
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.