CIS3002: Agile Methods - ManFace case study - Management Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Research and answer the following questions 

1. Refer to the case study in the textbook (page 53 or appendix 2), using your knowledge of Agile suggest tools that could potentially be used to keep this project from resulting in failure. Support your argument with references to statistics from the chaos report. (available in the course readings section of study desk) 

2. In the Scrum guide it recommends an ideal team size. There are numerous studies on project failure that sight communication as a primary factor. Explain the link between these two statements supporting your argument with references to Agile visionaries, communication theory & social psychology. 

3. In 2016 Scrum Values were added to the Scrum guide, almost 20 years after Scrum was introduced. Speculate on the reasoning as to why they were added. Research and comment on if they have found widespread adoption. 

4. In the assessment 1 resource section, you will find a document called “Agile PM Resource card -Retrospective" using this as a template develop 2 more retrospective cards for different ways of running a retrospective meeting. 

5. From the perspective of the project manager what are the difficulties you see with what Ron Jefferies is saying? What is the one metric or combination of metrics you think should be the most important and why? 

6. Read the ManFace case study (Appendix 2) then answer these questions: 

a. What PM framework do you think should be used, justify your answer with Cynefin.

b. With the PM framework you suggest what challenges do you see occurring during the project lifecycle? Explain what tools from the framework you would use to mitigate these challenges. 

7. Using 3 actors with different perspectives write 3 fully developed user stories that highlight how differing perspectives can alter the project outcome of building a bus stop shelter. (refer to module 6.1.0 For an explanation of a User Story, Perspective of the Actor, Acceptance criteria & INVEST) 

8. Read the WHP case study (Appendix 2) then answer these questions: 

a. What framework is being used to deliver WhatIf?

b. Explain the significance of the 4 hour timebox meeting. What meeting is this and why is it that length? 

c. Explain the rest of the meetings, what is their names in the framework?

d. Explain the cards, what phases they go through, what are the names of the phases in the framework? 

e. Explain the roles in the project, what are their names in the framework?

This CIS3002: Management Assignment has been solved by our Management Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.