Highlights
You must research a specific digital device and discuss how to obtain evidence from that digital device. You will be told which digital device you must research – no two students will be researching the same digital device.
You must use the “CO4514 Assignment One Template” (located on Blackboard) for your short report.
This will require a deeper understanding of the underlying technology. You will be told which device to focus on.
Different devices bring their own challenges when it comes to evidence recovery or evidence acquisition. For example, some devices may support a full physical acquisition, some devices may not, and some devices may require a part acquisition using logical methods.
For this task, you are expected to analyse and understand your digital device, and then postulate ways in which to acquire evidence from this device. Part of your write-up should explain where and how evidence is stored on your device.
You should:
Provide an overview of the digital device you have been assigned. This overview should focus on the hardware capabilities, and summarise the most important parts in relation to an acquisition of evidence
Identify what kind of acquisition you can perform. This should be informed by your research and should be one of
Full physical
Logical
Part-image
Manual
Justify why you believe this acquisition technique is the most appropriate for your specific advice. This justification should be informed by your research into the device.
Identify and justify which tools you would use to obtain evidence from this device.
Identify how you uphold the ACPO good practice guide principles. Do not repeat the principles here, this should be about YOU and obtaining evidence from your device. Essentially, you should tell me how you would apply the ACPO good practice guide.
Identify any evidence artefacts you can obtain from your digital device.
Explain and justify why those artefacts would be useful in prosecuting a crime.
Assessed Learning Outcomes
This assignment will assess the following module learning outcomes.
LO1 – Critically evaluate technology (software and hardware) used during the investigation of digital crime
LO2 – Critically evaluate tools, techniques and issues related to the recovery of digital evidence
LO4 – Use and extend a technical vocabulary necessary to interact with stakeholders in a digital forensic investigation
Constraints
There is a constraint of 600 words for this assignment. This is the upper limit. Any work exceeding this word limit will not be marked.
References do not count towards your word count. However, your in-text citations do count towards the word count.
Submission
This assignment must be submitted via the Turnitin assignment on the CO4514 Blackboard area.
Penalties
Your report should not contain spelling and grammar errors. You should very carefully proofread your work and ensure that you don’t make mistakes. There are proof reading services available either at the University or online. Do not give your work to other students to proofread as this may end up with your work being copied without your knowledge.
Where work is not your own, you must acknowledge the original author. When using materials from other sources you should summarise their work into your own words and build their opinion/material into your own report. Even if you have summarised the work of another person, you should provide a citation to the author. You should only provide long quotations when it the quotation is the important thing you are trying to communicate.
Group Work / Individual Work
This assignment is not group work and you should not work with anybody else on this assignment. Do not copy other people’s work. Do not let other people copy your work. Make sure you are aware of the University regulations about unfair means by looking at the academic regulations.
Make sure you reference any work that is not your own. Do not copy and paste blocks of text where you can paraphrase. Even when you paraphrase, you should still reference the original work. Any quotes should be enclosed in text.
Make sure you are aware of the Harvard referencing standard.
If you do not follow the correct standards for referencing your work, your work will go through the School’s unfair means procedure. If it is determined that your work has received an unfair advantage then the work will be capped at 0% and for a first attempt, you will be allowed to retake the assignment.
This CO4514: IT/Computer Science Assignment has been solved by our IT/Computer Science Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.