COM739 - Big Data and Infrastructure - IT/Computer Science Assignment Help

Assignment Task

1. Introduction 
2. Approach a. Pre-processing: Describe any steps taken to clean and structure the dataset in order to carry out the proposed analysis. b. Algorithm 
3. Results Assessment Criteria: This assessment is worth 50% of the module. The work of the student will be assessed upon: 1. Pre-processing steps. 2. Algorithm used to analyse the data. 3. Analysis conducted.
 4. Description of the analysis.
 5. Description of the result. 
The marksheet and the rubric for this coursework are provided below. 
Submission Components
 Each student has to upload two components in their solution. The first component is the Google Colab containing the analysis script which has a weightage of 40%. The second component has a weightage of 60% and should be in one of the two formats below: 
1. Report: 
a. single column, maximum of 4 pages, Arial font with size 11 2. Video Recording: a. Maximum duration of 15 minutes 
b. The idea behind video recording is to allow students to use presentation approaches like animations and other appropriate techniques. 
c. The video should end with a list of citations used for the work. You are required to submit either a report or a video recording. Both items should be uploaded to Blackboard Learn. The report will be submitted through TurnitIn for plagiarism checks. All information used in the second components must be appropriately cited and referenced. Submission Process:  The students are required to submit their solution in BBL .

Individual feedback will be provided within three weeks of submission date via Blackboard Learn. Separate links should be used for submitting the different components: 
1. Google Colab Notebook: Use the link, named “Notebook”.
 2. Report: Use the link, named “Report”. 
3. Video Recording: Use the link, named “Video Recording”.
 Note that you are required to submit either a report or a podcast. While uploading in BBL, name the uploaded items in the format B-Number_First-name_Last-name.File-extension. For example, if your B-Number is b0123456 and your name is John McLaine then your Colab should have the name “b0123456_john_mclaine.ipynb”. 

Marksheet Marking Criteria Available Marks Marks Report / Recording (60%) Description of the problem and articulation of the approach used in building the model. 10 Description of the modelling technique used. 20 Evaluation of the model performance and presentation of the analysis and results. 30 Colab (40%) Evaluation Programming 30 Efficiency 10 Total Mark: /100 Comments COM739: Big Data and Infrastructure (2020-2021) Set Exercise Rubric Report / Recording CRITERIA Overview of the approach 1 (0-2) 2 (3-5) 3 (6-8) 4 (9-10) Description of the problem and articulation of the approach used in building the model. Does the report / recording describe the approach used for the given problem? There is no clear description provided for the approach. The problem and the approach taken are described briefly. A justification for the approach is provided briefly or is missing. It is difficult to interpret the reasons why the student has chosen this strategy. More detail on the justification of the strategy are needed. A good detailed description of the problem and the strategy chosen are provided. A clear justification for the approach is also provided. Only minor details are missing. Limited references made to literature sources for supporting the approach taken. The student provided an excellent description of the problem and the approach taken for analysis. The reasoning behind the approach is clearly outlined. It is obvious that the student clearly identified the suitable strategy based on relevant sources. 1 (0-3) 2 (4-10) 3 (11-17) 4 (18-20) Description of the modelling technique used. Does the report / recording demonstrate student understanding of the problem domain and ability to identify the appropriate techniques for modelling? Have all pre-processing steps been clearly described? The appropriate modelling techniques have been named but are not described. There is no explanation on how the approach was practically implemented or validated. The appropriate modelling techniques have been briefly described. The student briefly discussed the implementation approach; however, the explanation is vague and hard to interpret. The student demonstrates a good understanding of the appropriate modelling techniques required for this problem. The implementation of the proposed approach is explained but lacked minor details like how the approach was validated. The appropriate modelling techniques are fully explained. The complete implementation and validation process of the study has been fully explained. 1 (0-3) 2 (4-13) 3 (14-23) 4 (24-30) Evaluation of the model performance and presentation of the analysis and results. Has the student applied appropriate techniques to develop their own models? Limited effort has been made to evaluate the performance of the model and analyse it for extracting useful information. The student has briefly explained how the models performed, but more explanation is required for complete understanding. The student has described how the model provided and presented performance metrics of the models to support his/her conclusions. The student comprehensive studied the model performance and provided relevant metrics for this purpose. Does the student present the findings from these models in detail and explain the implications of the findings? Limited analysis and discussion is provided regarding findings from the model. Some effort was made for further analysis without clear justification. Further analysis was done to extract useful information from the model with proper justification as to how this information is useful. Colab 1 (0-3) 2 (4-13) 3 (14-23) 4 (24-30) Programming This criterion covers all aspects of analysis like pre-processing, analysis and visualization Code used for the analysis is incorrect or missing. The code for the analysis is present but some steps of the analysis are either missing or are not working. The code for the analysis is present and working as expected. Student conducted a comprehensive analysis and the code is working as described. Proper comments were added to the Colab for the understanding of the reader. 1 (0-2) 2 (3-5) 3 (6-8) 4 (9-10) Efficiency No steps were taken to improve the speed and memory consumed by the algorithm. Some effort was made to improve the speed and efficiency of the algorithm. Effort was made to improve the speed and memory of the algorithm. The code looking at alternate approaches is present in the Colab. Systematic effort was made to improve the speed and memory of the algorithm. Visualizations were provided offering insight into this analysis.
 

This COM739 - IT/Computer Science Assignment has been solved by our IT/Computer Science Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.