Highlights
Americans
Americans continue to disagree about almost every aspect ofthe Vietnam War more than 30 years after it ended. What purpose intervention in Indochina why America's military commitment escalated, how the war was fought, whether it could have been won, and if it should have been waged at all are questions that still generate vehement dispute. On one issue alone has something akin to consensus emerged: namely, tele vision's pivotal role in turning American opinion against the war. Television, it's widely believed, lost the Vietnam war - for better or worse (Hallin, 1989, 105-6). Although television ownership became widespread in the United States in the early 1950s, precisely as US forces were engaged in an unpopular and unsuccessful 'police action' in Korea, Vietnam was the first war to receive sustained TV news coverage. In technological terms, the Korean War (l95(}"3)'resembled World War II more closely than it foreshadowed the war in Vietnam. About one third of A~erican homes possessed' a television set by the early 1950s, but this new medium's exis tence barely dented military consciousness in Korea. Weighing some 50 pounds and requiring three men to carry the necessary cables, batteries and sound equipment, cameras weren't readily transported onto the battlefield. In the main, network news relied on moving imagery supplied by the Army Signal Corps for stories from Korea, if they were illustrated at all. When venturesome reporters attempted to procure more graphic glimpses of combat they generally came up empty-handed (Casey, 2008, 312-13). By the time that Vietnam began to attract regular attention from US news media in the mid-1960s television had advanced considerably as a medium. The introduction of communications satellites made footage fresher than in the early days when of film had to be flown from the location of shooting to the point of broadcast transmission. With up-to date images more readily available television news evolved from a staid recitation of daily happenings - delivered by a sedentary, studio-bound 96
Television Wars: Vietnam and After 97
talking head to a more dynamic format that incorporated video clips transporting viewers.to the scene of action. For the first time television news assumed a half-hour format in the 1960s. Not surprisingly, given that 90 per cent of US households now boasted a television set, this new medium came to supplant newspapers as Americans' primary source of news (Brewer, 2009, 181). Television's primacy, coupled with its visual potency, strengthened the widespread impression that television cover age of the war must explain declining popular support for it. The first 'living room war,' as Michael Arlen termed it, was also America' s lea~t successful, most unpopular engagement. For many observers, television had to be the culpable variable that explained defeat (Arlen, 1982; Hallin, 1989,105). Such assertions mounted while the war was still in progress. Richard Nixon's Vice President Spiro Agnew frequently blasted the media for conspiring to 'sell the liberal ideology of the New York-Washington axis' - in other words, for pushing an anti-war agenda (Gans, 1970,222). But it was a British broadcaster, Robin Day, who delivered the most memorable prognosis about conflict in the television age at the height of the Vietnam War. In Encounter magazine's April 1970 issue, Day offered a speculative judgement that would be widely repeated: One wonders whether in future a democracy which has uncensored television in every home will ever be able to fight a war, however just. However good the cause - self-defense, resisting aggression, or even fighting under the United Nations flag - the brutal details of military action may be there on the television screen to shock and to horrify, sapping perhaps the will of the nation to resist the forces of evil or even safeguard;its own freedom. (Quoted by Sulzberger, 1970, 39)
This Sociology Assignment has been solved by our Sociology Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.