Computer Science and Creative Technologies - IT Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Contents
Section 1:Overview of Assessment
Section 2:Task Specification
Section 3:Deliverables
Section 4:Marking Criteria
Section 1:Overview of Assessment
This assignment assesses the following module learning outcomes:
To form a deep and systematic understanding of why cyber security matters, both in terms of the importance on business operations and on our modern society.
To apply relevant techniques such as ISMS and FAIR, to formulate effective solutions for Risk Management.
To analyse a broad range of real-world security issues that face commercial organisations and other institutions.
To identify the shortcomings of real-world security incidents andevaluate and critique how ISMS and FAIR can be utilised to help better inform decisions and mitigate risks.
To develop critical reflection skills and analyse of self in the context of proposing suitable ISMS strategy, and to further independent learning ability required for continuing professional development.
The assignment is worth 100%of the overall mark for the module.
Broadly speaking, the assignment requires you to produce a 3000-word report that provides a critical reflection on a real-world security incident, with evidence of risk assessment using suitable methodologies, and how this can inform mitigation of future incidents. The assignment also requires the delivery of a 10-minute presentation to disseminate the findings reported in your journal article, to address the role of Information Risk Management to the wider organisation.
The assignment is described in more detail in section 2. This is an individual assignment.
Working on this assignment will help you to develop your knowledge and understanding of applying risk methodologies to resolve real-world security incidents. It will also help to develop your critical thinking skills for identifying appropriate mitigation strategies to avoid future security incidents. If you have questions about this assignment, please post them to the discussion board “Information Risk Management Assignment” on Blackboard.
Section 2:Task Specification
Part 1 (worth 75% towards the final grade):Produce a 3000-word report to address a case study of information risk management, informed by a real-world security incident and demonstrating concepts of IRM.
For this assignment, you are expected to present a case study for a chosen organisation, informed by a real-worldsecurity incident, and provide a narrative that presents a risk assessment and a critical reflection in the form of a journal article. The article will need to address the following aspects:
Description of the chosen industry and why IRM is important in the given context. This should be justified based on evidence from other related real-world security incidents, with discussion as to why these are significant risk indicators.
Identification of key assets and personnel within the organisation, with discussion on information asset valuation and relevant risk methodologies (ISMS and FAIR).
Examples of risk analysis using appropriate methodology to illustrate the potential impact on the chosen organisation. You will need to justify how you derive quantitative and qualitative values for risk assessment.
Critical reflection on appropriate treatment strategies that address the identified risks, with strong justification for the decisions taken.
You are expected to draw on both ISO27000 and FAIR as discussed within the module to justify your analytical approach in assessing the security incident. You will need to conduct further research into both of these methodologies, beyond the provided lecture material. Your critical reflection should also reflect on your choice of risk methodology, and their relative strengths and limitations.
The report should be written as a journal article for a professional audience using the IEEE template, provided on Blackboard. The article is expected to be no more than 3000 words, please refer to the UWE word count policy: http://www1.uwe.ac.uk/aboutus/policies.aspx
Part 2 (worth 25% towards the final grade):Prepare an individual videoed PowerPoint presentationfor a CEO pitch that reports your findings
The presentation should be considered as a pitch to the CEO to impress the importance and relevance of information risk management for the chosen organisation. You should draw on real-world security incidents in the context of your chosen organisation. You should expand beyond what is included in the report to provide greater detail if deemed necessary. The presentation should be delivered as a videoed PowerPoint presentation. The presentation should be designed so that it can be delivered within a time of 10 minutes. This contributes towards 25% of the module’s assessment.
Section 3: Deliverables
Part 1: A written report is to be submitted via Blackboard by Thursday 5th August 2021in either DOC or PDF format.
Part 2: A 10-minutevideoed PowerPoint presentation is to be prepared. This should be submitted via Blackboard by Thursday 19th August 2021.
Section 4:Marking Criteria
The marking criteria for both the journal article and the report can be found on the next page:
Part 1: Report (Contribution of each marking component is shown)
0-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-84 85-100 Mark & Feedback
Description of organisation, importance of IRM, and analysis of real- world security incident (20%) Little or no evidence of research related to a real-world security incident or why IRM is important for the chosen organisation Some evidence of research related to a real- world security incident and why IRM is important for the chosen organisation, however lacking significant details A real-world security incident has been identified with key details being discussed. IRM is discussed for the chosen organisation A real-world security incident has been identified, with some discussion on why the incident occurred. IRM is discussed for the chosen organisation A well-detailed real- world security incident has been identified, with some discussion on why the incident occurred and how this could have been mitigated. IRM is well-justified for the chosen organisation A well-detailed real- world security incident has been identified, with good discussion on why the incident occurred and how this could have been mitigated IRM is well-justified for the chosen organisation A well-detailed real- world security incident has been identified, with excellent discussion on why the incident occurred and justification of how this could have been mitigated. Excellent justification for IRM for the chosen organisation Application of ISMS AND FAIR in context of the organisation
(20%) Little or no discussion on the use of an ISMS and FAIR Some discussion on the use of an ISMS and FAIR, however lacking in details Discussion on the use of an ISMS and FAIR, however little application to organisation Discussion on the use of an ISMS and FAIR with application to the organisation, but at a fairly basic level. Discussion on the use of an ISMS and FAIR with a good discussion on the application to the organisation. Good discussion on the use of an ISMS and FAIR with the justification of how this can apply to the organisation. Excellent discussion on the use of an ISMS and FAIR with the strong justification of how this can apply to the organisation. Analysis of Identified Risks, and proposal of treatment strategies
(30%) No attempt at identifying or analysing risks Identification of some risks, with limited analysis. Identification of some risks, with some basic analysis and treatment strategies Identification of a variety of risks, with analysis and detail of treatment strategies Identification of a variety of risks, with clear analysis and good detail of treatment strategies Identification of a broad variety of risks, with clear analysis and good detail of treatment strategies Identification of a broad variety of risks, with excellent analysis and strong justification of treatment strategies choices Critical reflection of appropriate security controls and legislation
(20%) No evidence of critical reflection on security controls and legislation Limited evidence of critical reflection on security controls and legislation Some discussion about the choice of security controls and legislation Discussion about the choice of security controls and relevant legislation, with some evidence of critique Good discussion about the choice of security controls and relevant legislation, with some evidence of critique Good discussion about the choice of security controls and relevant legislation, with strong evidence of critique Excellent discussion about the choice of security controls and relevant legislation, with strong evidence and justification of critique Report Presentation (10%) Poor presentation Weak presentation Fair presentation Good presentation but with some grammatical errors Good presentation with minor errors Excellent presentation but with minor errors Excellent presentation Part 2: Presentation (Contribution of each marking component is shown)
 

This IT Assignment has been solved by our IT Experts at My Uni Paper.Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
    
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.