Corporate Governance Concepts and Theory Report Writing - Accounting Assignment Help

Assignment Task

1. Board Evaluation Report
Note: All written assessments should be submitted as Word files (.docx) (Word is available from your AIB Office 365 account)
Completing Learning Activities in Modules 1, 2, and 3 will help you develop your responses to the first assessment.
In this assessment, you will apply corporate governance concepts, codes and theories to critically evaluate the board structure and board diversity, and their relationship to the conformance and performance functions of the board.
Task
Select a company and one of its competitors (preferably publicly listed companies from the same jurisdiction due to data availability and comparability) and retrieve relevant corporate governance information. As explained in Activity 1.2, you will find the corporate governance information disclosed in the company’s most recent annual report (Australian companies), proxy statement (US companies), management proxy circular (Canadian companies), company website or other company statements. For example, the Commonwealth Bank of Australia provides governance information in its annual report: (CBA Annual Report). You can usually find these documents on the organisation’s or regulator’s website.
Based on the disclosed governance information and relevant governance concepts, codes and theories, evaluate how your selected board performs its conformance and performance functions, according to the following perspectives:
Board structure: Discuss the overall board structure (in terms of unitary vs two-tier) of your selected company in comparison to the competitor. Evaluate the board members in terms of executive versus non-executive directors and their affiliations with other organisations. Discuss practical implications of the findings in relation to the board’s conformance and performance functions.
Board diversity: Critically evaluate and compare the board diversity of your selected company with that of the competitor firm, including diversity in skill and experience, expertise, gender, age and any other social or cultural aspects of directors. Discuss practical implications of the findings in relation to the board’s conformance and performance functions.
Provide constructive suggestions for improvement to the board of the chosen firm (not the competitor).
Requirements
Define critical terminology at the beginning of each section.
Where possible, draw out and discuss implications for the conformance and performance functions of the board.
Discuss relevant corporate governance codes, principles & theories in relation to both board structure and board diversity. 
The required word length for this report is 2,000 words (plus 10% tolerance).
You are required to use at least five (5) academic references for this report (in addition to any references for the disclosed corporate governance information such as annual reports).
Your references should be from credible sources such as books, industry-related journals, magazines, or academic journal articles. Your grade will be adversely affected if your assignment contains no/poor citations and/or reference list and if your assignment word length is beyond the allowed tolerance level (see Assessment Policy available on AIB website).  
Resources
Prescribed textbook and learning materials and readings from Modules 1–3.
Disclosed governance information source: annual reports (Australian companies), proxy statement (US companies), management proxy circular (Canadian companies), company website, or other company statements
Corporate governance codes: ASX CGOV Recommendations & Principles, OECD principles, NYSE CGOV guide, ECGI principles, AICD non-for-profit governance principles, TSX Corporate Governance guidelines.
Format
The report format should follow AIB Style Guide (i.e., cover page including your name and a student id, title and word count of the report, executive summary, table of contents, body, list of references, and appendix if needed).   
Please use the AIB Report Template to format your report, or use the AIB-preferred Microsoft Word settings (see page 34 of the AIB Style Guide). 
Use author-date style referencing (which includes in-text citations and a reference list)  
Grading criteria and feedback
Your assessment will be marked according to the following grading criteria:
Criterion 1: Theories. Understanding of relevant corporate governance concepts and theory – 20%
Criterion 2: Codes/principles. Understanding of key corporate governance codes and principles – 10%
Criterion 3: Board structure evaluation. Critically evaluate the board structure of the selected company in comparison to its competitor – 25%
Criterion 4: Board diversity evaluation. Critically evaluate the board diversity of the selected company in comparison to its competitor – 35%
Criterion 5: Referencing. In-text citations and referencing – 5%
Criterion 6: Communication. Communication, presentation, structure and language – 5%

This Accounting Assignment has been solved by our Accounting Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
    
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.