Criteria from the CONSORT Statement for Clinical Trials - Medical Science Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Task:

A research article reporting an intervention study attached as pdf. You are asked to evaluate the reporting quality of this report against selected criteria from the CONSORT statement for clinical trials. Also download from links on this page:

The CONSORT checklist.

Reporting quality guide – you may use this guide as well as or instead of the CONSORT checklist.

A document template with sections to complete and submit as the assignment. The Resources folder on this page has extra materials, including a similar task for diagnostic studies and the STARD statement for reporting quality of diagnostic studies.

For the supplied journal article you are asked to evaluate what the authors have written against what the CONSORT statement says should appear in a clinical trial report. Be especially alert for CONSORT criteria that the article wrongly neglects. State, too, what the authors have done particularly well. Therefore, try to identify:

1. Important and relevant CONSORT criteria that the authors have met in their report. In this way, you identify where the authors have conformed to CONSORT criteria.

2. Important and relevant criteria that the authors have missed. The authors could have overlooked important criteria or incompletely addressed them in the article. In this way, you are identifying where the authors have not conformed to CONSORT criteria. “Important” means that the statement criteria and parts of the article you discuss affect the value of the article for evidence-based practice. You should not attempt to address all criteria. Within the word limit you cannot mention all of the CONSORT criteria, and you are not expected to. Many CONSORT criteria will not even apply to your article, in which case there is no need to mention the irrelevant criteria at all. It is better to address a limited number of important criteria than to discuss unimportant issues superficially. Avoid labouring minor points not affecting the article’s value to an evidence-based practitioner. Write about what a practising clinician would want to know about the research project in order to decide whether the evidence is reliable, valid and useful.

This Medical Science Assignment has been solved by our Medical Science experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.