Critical Comprehension Of Multimodal Digital Literature - Management Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Assessment Task 1: Programming (Pair Work)

• Critically Evaluate And Amend A Teaching Program To Support Students To Achieve A Challenging Discipline Goal (I.e. Critical Comprehension Of Multimodal Digital Literature).Length and/or format:Equivalent to 2000 words (-/+10%) excluding the Appendix
• Purpose: This task is designed to enable you to demonstrate your critical understanding of program development, content and pedagogical knowledge in teaching multimodal digital literature and critical literacy.
• Learning outcomes assessed:1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.
• How to submit:Assessment tasks are to be submitted online via Turnitin.
• Return of assignment:Returned within three weeks of submission.
• Assessment criteria:This assessment task will be marked against the given criteria using the rubric.
• Pair work: Both students must attempt all parts of the assignment and submit a collaborative piece of work. In the submission, please indicate the percentage of the contribution and identify sections each member takes the lead role in. The same mark will be awarded to both members of the pair. In case of unequal distribution, up to 50% of the mark can be deducted from the member with less contribution. No mark will be awarded for members with little or no contribution.
• TASK DESCRIPTION
• Extended analytical essay: Critical evaluation and amendment of a multimodal digital literature and literacy program
• Word count guide: Essay: 2000 (-/+ 10%) words; Amendments in Appendix: word count not applied.
•  
• Use your content, pedagogical and curriculum knowledge gained in EDLA342/369 to write an extended analytical essay to analyse and evaluate the ‘The Lost Thing’ program provided in the Appendix of this unit outline. (An analytical essay is one in which you analyse and evaluate contents/issues). The program was developed with the objective to teach comprehension and creation of critical multimodal digital literature to Stage 3 students, focusing on Characterisation literary concept.
• Suggested essay structure:
• ESSAY STAGES KEY QUESTIONS/POINTS
• Introduction Background:
• What is your understanding of (1) multimodal digital literature and (2) critical literacy?
• The importance to teach critical multimodal digital literacy in primary schools as stated in the curriculum.
• Position: Your general evaluation of the program presented in the Appendix.
• Preview: Preview the main points you are going to develop in this essay to support your position.
• Body:
• Analysis and Evaluation Point 1: Curriculum outcomes and the selected text ‘The Lost Thing’
• Analysis of curriculum outcomes and English textual concept(s) covered in the program
• Evaluation of the selection of the main text, ‘The Lost Thing’ and curriculum outcomes in terms of comprehensiveness, suitability and level of details to meet the teaching aim.
• Point 2: Teaching content (Scope and Sequence)
• Analysis of teaching contents covered in the program.
• Evaluation of quality of teaching contents in terms their:
• (1) accuracy
• (2) suitability for the target students;
• (3) scope (level comprehensiveness and details)
• (4) sequence (logical sequencing of contents).
•  
• To support your analysis and evaluation, use the knowledge gained in this unit about:
• literary English textual concepts (e.g. characterisation)
• literature adaptation
• meaning making resources in written literature and its multimodal digital adaptation
• grammar and multimodal resources for characterisations in the written literature and its film adaptation
• Point 3: Pedagogical knowledge
• Analysis and evaluation of pedagogical content knowledge demonstrated in the program
• To guide your analysis and evaluation, ask yourself these questions:
• Does the development of the units of work and activities in the lessonsfollow any clear and consistent pedagogical principles (e.g. scaffolding pedagogy (i.e. gradual release of responsibility/the teaching and learning cycle, explicit teaching etc)?
• cater for student diversity?
• use technology applications effectively for teaching digital literacy?
• include engaging and effective teaching and learning activities?
• include effective formative and summative assessment tasks?
• Look closely into the lesson sequence in each unit of work:
• Are the contents in each lesson directly relate to the objective/content/ theme of the whole program?
• Are the contents in each lesson organised accumulatively to help achieve the teaching and learning objectives of the unit?
• Look closely into the activity sequence in each lesson:
• Are the activities directed related to the objective/content/ theme of the whole unit of work?
• Are the activities organised accumulatively to help achieve the lesson objective?
• Do the teaching resources demonstrate accurate content knowledge?
• Are the teaching resources effective in helping students achieve the objective of the whole unit of work?
• Conclusion and recommendation for improvement Summarise your analysis and evaluation.
• Propose amendments to improve the program (including proposing a change of main literary text).
• Present the amendments using the new suggested text in the Appendix (not counted towards word limit).
• NOTE: Include four examples of the amendments to improve the program in regard to:
• Selection of curriculum outcomes
• Scope and sequence of teaching contents
• Sequence of activities in one lesson (One lesson plan)
• Teaching materials for one of the amended activities.
• You are not allowed to use the same excerpts and activities in the lecture and tutorial materials in your assessment task but you can use the same texts (e.g. Coraline, Wonder, Anne of Green Gable).
   

This Management Assignment has been solved by our Management Experts at onlineassignmentbank. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
    
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.