Critique The Authors of the Article Case Study - Management Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Task:

Critique The authors of the article being critiqued are Kurt D. Squire and Mingfong Jan. The article was published in February 2007 by the Journal of Science Education and Technology with the title Mad City Mystery: Developing Scientific Argumentation Skills with a Place-based Augmented Reality Game on Handheld Computers. This article presents a study that was conducted on students across a broad age range; from elementary school to graduate studies, with the goal of investigating the role of games with purposeful design in supporting development of students’ scientific argumentation skills with relevance to 21st century challenges. The article exhibits a clear and organized structure in its introduction except for one rationale that could be contested, which is a method employed for unveiling the significance of the study. The authors used phrases and statements that would – in most cases – be rather vague for readers who are unfamiliar with the field, such as “scientific literacy practices” (para 6). However, they did well by following up with explanations within parentheses. They explained the aforementioned quote, for example, in the sentence that followed it by listing in parenthesis the numerous types of analyses, reports and discussions done in relation to the game World of Warcraft. This appears to be an advisable move as the article shows a sizeable number of elaborations. This technique of organisation allows readers who are familiar with the terms to carry on reading without interference – upon arrival at parentheses, which normally signal a break in thought flow – while still providing readers who are less familiar some enlightenment within punctuation marks. The authors appeared to imply in the beginning that it is not the prerogative of teachers to dictate how students proceed towards completing a given assignment. This appears so because they contrasted learning dynamics within and out of school, stating that what students take as true may be based on experience or community agreement instead of what teachers say (para 2). This premise is debatable because there is no reason to believe that there is any difference between what teachers say and what can be experienced or is agreed upon by the community. However, this was later expounded (para 8) by the authors as they cited situations in which the “appeal to authority” dynamics has failed, such as begetting the perception of laboratory experiments as means for arriving at pre-determined facts. Despite the idea of disparity being still disputable, its plausibility is sufficient as a research gap. Thus, they acknowledged the aims and restraints of school settings and then suggested remedying the situation by revising assignment approaches (para 8 and 9) – thus establishing an allusion to their goals. In conclusion, the authors have astutely applied punctuation to assist explanation of their points for readers and they have applied a contestable argument smartly to set up and reveal the relevance of their study. The authors have constructed a solid piece to promote the importance of their enterprising goal of investigating efficient ways of integrating technology for the purpose of education.

This Management Assignment has been solved by our Management Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.