Demonstrate an Advanced Understanding of the Procedures in the Selected Ultrasound Examination - Medical Science Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Task:

Case study 1
Case studies have been included in this unit for you to demonstrate an advanced understanding of the procedures in the selected ultrasound examination, as well as a demonstration of your ability to critically analyse information. It is hoped that you will consider how this knowledge and skills can be incorporated into your own work.
Content guidelines
The case study assignment consists of a set of ultrasound images that you will be asked to assess and evaluate. This includes identifying normal anatomy and pathology found in the case, research and discussion of the pathology as well as a critique of the images presented.
Alternatively, you may use your own clinical ultrasound examination as the basis for the case study. The case should be a thyroid examination that you have participated in, and was performed in the last six months. Case studies should ideally demonstrated some pathology or abnormality. If using your own case, inclusion of de-identified ultrasound images is an important part of the submission. Please ensure patient confidentiality is maintained at all times. Technical scan information should be visible on the images.  
 An appropriate reference list appended to each case study is an important part of the study and this should use APA style as set out at:
http://canberra.libguides.com/c.php?g=599301&p=4148716 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.The following headings may be used or adapted to provide the required information.

• Patient history - discussion of patient history and possible findings
• Patient preparation and care - discussion of patient preparation and care (before, during and after) for this type of scan
• Relevant anatomy - discussion of anatomy investigated
• Procedure for examination - discussion of procedure for the examination
• Image appearances - discussion of image appearances using appropriate terminology
• Findings and possible diagnoses - discussion of findings and possible differential diagnoses including justification for reaching these conclusions
• Relevant pathology and associated findings - research and discussion of relevant pathology and associated findings

Technical aspects of the examination - discussion of technical aspects of examination including possible improvements and image optimisation
Please refer to the marking rubric for weighting of each of the above aspects. A word count should be included. If you exceed the word count, only the content under the specified limit (3000 words) will be marked.

Relevant patient history

• (10 marks) Clear, concise and thorough discussion of patient history. Relevant to and consistent with the case Clear, concise discussion of patient history consistent with case Clear, concise discussion of patient history. Minor omissions with respect to the case Patient history overly verbose, or too brief. Some inconsistencies or
• omissions with respect to the case Poorly worded or absent patient history. Little or no relevance to case Patient preparation and care
• (10 marks) Comprehensive understanding of core concepts with strong evidence of understanding of patient preparation and care. Includes discussion of
• patient preparation, patient care including appropriate communication and procedure for obtaining consent. Sound understanding of core concepts demonstrated, with sufficient evidence of understanding of patient preparation and care Adequate understanding of core concepts demonstrated, with some evidence of understanding of patient preparation and
• care Some understanding of core concepts demonstrated, with limited evidence of understanding of patient preparation and care. Minimal understanding of core concepts demonstrated, with poor or absent evidence of understanding of patient preparation and care. Relevant anatomy
• (20 marks) Advanced discussion of relevant anatomy. Thorough discussion of relevant anatomy. Sound discussion of relevant anatomy. Basic discussion of relevant anatomy. Rudimentary discussion of relevant anatomy. Procedure for examination
• (10 marks) Clear, concise and thorough discussion of procedure for the examination. Relevant to and consistent with the case. Clear and concise discussion of procedure for the examination. Relevant to the case. Clear and concise discussion of procedure for the examination. Minor inconsistencies with the case. Discussion is verbose, or too brief. Limited relevance to the case. Poorly worded or absent discussion of procedure for the examination. No relevance to the case. Image appearances
• (20 marks) Advanced discussion of image appearances using appropriate terminology. Thorough discussion of image appearances using appropriate terminology. Sound discussion of image appearances using appropriate terminology. Basic discussion of image appearances using mostly appropriate terminology. Rudimentary discussion of image appearances using some appropriate terminology. Findings and possible diagnoses
• (10 marks) Relevant and comprehensive discussion of findings and possible differential diagnoses. Relevant discussion of findings that considers differential diagnoses. Relevant discussion of findings that mentions possible differential diagnoses. Mostly correct discussion of findings, however no discussion of differential diagnoses. Incorrect or absent discussion of findings; differential diagnoses not considered. Relevant pathology and associated findings
• (20 marks) Advanced discussion of relevant pathology and associated findings. Evidence of comprehensive research into presenting condition including peer reviewed journal articles. Thorough discussion of relevant pathology associated findings. Evidence of valid research into presenting condition. Sound discussion of relevant pathology associated findings. Evidence of some research into presenting condition. Basic discussion of relevant pathology associated findings. Little evidence of research into presenting condition. Rudimentary discussion of relevant pathology associated findings. No evidence of research into presenting condition. Technical aspects of the examination
• (10 marks) Possible improvements to examination comprehensively discussed Possible improvements to examination discussed Possible improvements to examination alluded to Scant mention of possible improvements to examination, or incorrect ones suggested Possible improvements to examination incoherent or ignored altogether Reasoning and critical analysis
• (10 marks) Highly logical and consistent forward progression of ideas. Comprehensive and insightful understanding of topics demonstrated. Logical and generally consistent forward progression of ideas. Sound understanding of topics demonstrated. Adequate progression of ideas. Adequate understanding of topics demonstrated. Some evidence of idea progression. Some understanding of topics demonstrated. Evidence of idea progression minimal or absent. Minimal understanding of topics demonstrated. Presentation and referencing
• (10 marks)
• Neatly presented with consistent formatting and referencing (APA style). Neatly presented with minor formatting or referencing inconsistencies (APA style).
• Acceptable presentation with some formatting or referencing inconsistency (APA style). Marginal presentation, inconsistent formatting or referencing (APA style). Poorly presented and inconsistently formatted or referencing. APA style not used. /130

The above Medical Science Assignment has been solved by our  Medical Science Assignment  Experts at onlineassignmentbank. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire considered worthy of the highest distinction.