Demonstrate the Development of Research and Analytical Skills - Management Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Task:

Assessment 2 : ESSAY 
Due Wednesday Week 9 1159PM Weighting 40% 
Assessment Task Write a research essay on one of the below topics. Your essay should demonstrate the development of research and analytical skills and be written from a perspective that expresses your own critical evaluations. Use your own drawings and diagrams from the corresponding site visit to demonstrate your analysis of the built environment. Tonic 1:  Critically analyse and evaluate the importance of materials, sunlight, and gravity using the architectural theory of tectonics and stereotomics. Use site visit Engineering Pavillion OR Perth Concert Hall. Use text From the Cave to the Hut.' by Alberto Campo Baeza. Topic 2:  Critically analyse and evaluate the relationship between space, form and purpose using the architectural theory of spatial typologies. Use site visit at Curtin (Building 401, Whitlam Walk and Dome) OR at Perth (Perth City Library, St George's Cathedral and State Buildings). Use text "The Persistence of Formal Patterns" by Alexander Purves. Tonic 3: Critically analyse and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of Le Corbusier's theory 'Five Points of Architecture' (Dom-ino house) and Mies Van der Rohe's theory of transparency. Use site visit Building 408 at Curtin OR Council House. Use "Continuity - The Glass Stare" by Adi Shamir Zion. 
Submission Requirements • 1500-1800 word count (excluding cover pager and end-text reference list). • At least 3 academic sources need to be cited with quotes or paraphrasing used. • Cite the reading provided for the corresponding topic. • No more than 3 non-academic sources can also be used in addition to the academic. • 2-4 hand drawn drawings from site visit should be scanned and included in your essay. • 1-2 hand drawn diagrams from site visit should be scanned and included in your essay. • Each image requires a figure number and caption. • Upload a single .pdf file to Tumitin via Moodie. 
Recommended Structure of the Assessment: • Introduction including definition of topic, main discussion points and introduction of site visit. • 3-5 body paragraphs and images with captions. • Conclusion. • Reference list. 
Marking Criteria & Feedback ARED1003 Uncle standing Architecture 
Assessment 2: Research Essay 140%) 
thanonsmna ..• taw, fe SON Demonstrates Y. understanding Wthe research top.. WASS (60.66,1 Demonstrates a vague understanding of Me resters% to, with little depth. C•II (1046%) Demonstrates a solid u.erstanding of . reward, toc. wnh some •depth and insight ....,... (70.76%) .rnonvIrates a developed a. Insightful understanding al the research tops. I WWII onencoon •.0,1 Demonstrates a NOW deve.ped and very insightful understan.ng of the researds topic. ..........W. nle••ich topic iced ....° °.." . selation to Me e1 X"Facts presented am not ie... to the t.. Lanns presented are re.ant to test MI are of du.us ....VSaws presented are accurate and re...ant to tash Facts pres.w. are wcurate awl h.,. :Neva. to the ta.. with Wear editing shown in selectson of information. Sects presented we ewer., ........ned to 1. with dear a. thought,. editing Amen in selection of inlormation. Leah ...co, .Y. wnd aait, Cinque lacts insght a. is poor. vintten enth li. or no analysis. Oiler s so. crib... but shows onW basicinsight. Demonstrates bayk 5.5 of OltirCel anahos. Offers sou.crdpise in an informed manner. .nonstrates stilfs of critical analysis. Offers dev.ped cid...* in an informed manner. .nonnrates hqh 1.11in critical analysis. OWets ...no. co.°. tan and informed manner. Demonstrates very high gug m critual misty,. w y viined ii--. .9irMY iwndrnind ...awn. norl used sPoleO, evidence (O.'”) IA. attempt has been ,.. to e.voop v. r.„.„..„,. An argument ,. been presented..., demontrates gaps cm sign. A clear argument is ...op.. presented win7 rmoductoon...... a. conclusion. Argument is clearly Oath! and well ...op. pod very 4...5.1.1.... Argument is very dear and well developed tent ..ant lognal flow Os.i e well .... nosily ndd ist1 Poor referencing with ,",rorst .w/po.or Qualm, research sources. Errors present in ref mos,: minimal number of quality research whnes. gement...es ergot good number and ituWay, but some errors may be Present in referenang. Adheres to Chicago referencing sostem and considers a range of matey sources. Adheres svegto Chicago referent, system and cons...a w. range of 'dn nn•n4'..... ' ..' .... d• "'dn. Wnnwl in inc.... ,hid ...dd.' wmire,mm,orm evldence of clarity and cohesion. nmre presents • c.a. coherent description of information. reads as a wh.. W.ng shows wry good clarity and cohesion and airy eflectwety. Wrrting n exceptso.Ory clew M. excellent sober.° and corn unarm,. 00., ,,,,..., recordings klieg.. ........ cur.. e,..6, pre pod., epp pee:en, or not the *colt Wt. author. D.,,,,,.......1., communeate sato. actor°, b. thee c.v... is not made rx,..• .. drawings are de...a support Me le. W.Va.. ,.drys communicate se., wen and are sew rel.* to the.. .1,..S dr.d .....^0 PPP.* ••••... nnutd commsnicatton a. am high., relevant. 
 

The above Management  Assignment has been solved by our  Management Assignment  Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire considered worthy of the highest distinction.