Develop an Understanding of the Research Methods - Medical Science Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Task:

This assignment will help you develop an understanding of the research methods that researchers use to investigate psychological questions. You will also gain first-hand experience of the role of a research participant by taking part in psychological research studies.
For this assignment, you will complete five credits worth of research through the Research experience program (REP). You will select two of your completed studies as the focus of an 800-word research methods essay. You are strongly encouraged to choose studies that employ two different research methods because the variety will give you more material to discuss in your essay.
All research will be conducted online.

• For this assignment, you will complete five credits worth of research via the Research experience program (REP), submit a completed REP summary table and write an 800-word research methods essay about two of the studies you completed.
• The assignment submission must contain the following components and will be assessed according to the descriptions provided.
• 1. Assignment title page
• Mark: Not marked, but mandatory for submission.
• The title page should include the title (Assignment 2: Research experience program [REP] assignment), your name, your eLA, and the assignment due date. See page 173 (Links to an external site.)  (Links to an external site.)in your Findlay eText for a template of what your title page should look like.
• 2. REP summary table
• Mark: Worth up to 20% of assignment mark. Each one credit of research participation is worth 4%. If you complete the REP summary table with information about at least two REP studies worth five credits, you will receive the full 20%.
• In this table, you will provide the details of all REP studies you participated in, including title, number of credits, and whether the study was conducted in a lab (e.g. on campus) or online. In the last column of the table you must indicate which two studies you discuss in your research methods essay.
• 3. Research methods essay
• Mark: Worth 70% of assignment mark, with a maximum of 35% allocated for each of the two research studies.
• Within the essay, you must provide the title of the two studies you selected. For each of theselected studies, you will:
• describe the purpose of the research,
• identify and explain the research method used,
• discuss how the method is (or is not) appropriate for its intended purpose, and
• consider the advantages and limitations of that research method.
• When explaining the research method, please be sure to include sufficient detail to demonstrate your understanding of that method within the context of the study.
• For example, if the researchers used an experiment, you should identify the independent variable(s) (IV) and dependent variable(s) (DV), and relate them to the purpose of the study.
• As another example, if the researchers used a correlational study, you should identify the variables whose relationship the researchers are interested in, identify the predictor and outcome variables (if relevant), and relate them to the purpose of the study.
• You are strongly encouraged to choose two studies that use different research methods (e.g. experiment, quasi-experiment, correlational study, survey) and/or measures (e.g. quantitative or qualitative measures; self-report or behavioural measures) to give you an opportunity to demonstrate the breadth of your research methods knowledge.
• You may choose to write this essay in whatever way you find most appropriate. For example, you may choose to write two separate essays (one for each of the selected studies), you may choose to write one essay (with separate paragraphs for each of the selected studies), or you may choose to write one essay that discusses the studies together. When deciding how to present the information, you should ensure that your arguments are clear and easy to follow.
• 4. References, appendix and style
• Mark: Worth 10% of assignment mark.
• You must include the debriefing forms from the two studies in an appendix. You do not need to include all of the debriefing forms for the studies you participated in—only those two that are discussed in your essay.
• Your assignment must be written in APA format.
• You must include a reference list at the end of your assignment in APA format.
• Your citations and references should match (i.e. if you cite something in the essay, it should appear in the reference list, and vice versa).
• Your essay should be written clearly, be free of grammatical and punctuation

Study 1 Description
(20%) You provided no or an erroneous description of the purpose of the study.

• You provided no or an erroneous overview of the research method or relevant variables. You provided a poor description of the purpose of the study.
• You provided a basic overview of the research method and/or relevant variables, but missed several important details or included several irrelevant details. You provided a superficial description of the purpose of the study.
• You identified and explained the research method and/or relevant variables, but missed a few important details or included a few irrelevant details. You provided an adequate description of the purpose of the study.
• You adequately identified and explained the research method. You adequately identified the relevant variables (IVs and DVs for experiments; predictor and outcome variables for correlational studies). You provided a clear, concise, and accurate description of the purpose of the study.
• You provided a clear, concise, and accurate identification and explanation of the research method and relevant variables (IVs and DVs for experiments; predictor and outcome variables for correlational studies).
• Study 1 Evaluation
• (10%) You provided no or an erroneous evaluation of the research method.
• You provided no or an erroneous description of advantages and limitations of the research method. You provided a poor evaluation of the research method.
• You provided a poor description of advantages and limitations of the research method. You provided a superficial evaluation of the research method.
• You provided a superficial description of advantages and limitations of the research method. You provided an adequate evaluation of the research method to answer the research question.
• You provided an adequate description of advantages and limitations of the research method. You provided a clear, concise, and accurate evaluation of the research method to answer the research question.
• You provided a clear, concise, and accurate description of advantages and limitations of the research method.
• Study 2 Description
• (20%) You provided no or an erroneous description of the purpose of the study.
• You provided no or an erroneous overview of the research method or relevant variables. You provided a poor description of the purpose of the study.
• You provided a basic overview of the research method and/or relevant variables, but missed several important details or included several irrelevant details. You provided a superficial description of the purpose of the study.
• You identified and explained the research method and/or relevant variables, but missed a few important details or included a few irrelevant details. You provided an adequate description of the purpose of the study.
• You adequately identified and explained the research method. You adequately identified the relevant variables (IVs and DVs for experiments; predictor and outcome variables for correlational studies). You provided a clear, concise, and accurate description of the purpose of the study.
• You provided a clear, concise, and accurate identification and explanation of the research method and relevant variables (IVs and DVs for experiments; predictor and outcome variables for correlational studies).

Study 2 Evaluation

• (10%) You provided no or an erroneous evaluation of the research method.
• You provided no or an erroneous description of advantages and limitations of the research method. You provided a poor evaluation of the research method.
• You provided a poor description of advantages and limitations of the research method. You provided a superficial evaluation of the research method.
• You provided a superficial description of advantages and limitations of the research method. You provided an adequate evaluation of the research method to answer the research question.
• You provided an adequate description of advantages and limitations of the research method. You provided a clear, concise, and accurate evaluation of the research method to answer the research question.
• You provided a clear, concise, and accurate description of advantages and limitations of the research method.
• Repetition
• (10%) When evaluating the research methods, you provided near identical information for the two studies. When evaluating the research methods, you provided similar information for the two studies. When evaluating the research methods, your report had some repetition for the two studies. When evaluating the research methods, your report had minimal repetition for the two studies. When evaluating the research methods, your report had no repetition for the two studies.
• References, appendix and style

The above Management  Assignment has been solved by our  Management Assignment  Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire considered worthy of the highest distinction.