Develop Professional Identity as a Social Worker - Management Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Task description:
This task consists of a series of short written reflections upon set readings and learning exercises you will complete in seminars.  These exercises will encourage you to critically reflect upon your learning in the course and develop your professional identity as a social worker.
You should write in the first person and incorporate scholarly literature into your reflections (e.g. from your course readings).
1.       Critically reflect upon the answer you chose in the activity in the first seminar regarding whether you thought families, communities, governments, or businesses should take primary responsibility for assisting people in need.  Reflect upon your learning since you completed this activity and whether your views have changed or remained the same. (500 words)
2.       Critically reflect upon the activity from the second seminar regarding the group of social work theories that resonate with you the most and where you would place yourself in Payne’s (2020) triangle. Reflect upon how your own values, past experiences and motivations for becoming a social worker influence your preferred theoretical orientation. (500 words)
3.       Critically reflect upon the set reading titled ‘The end of social work’ by Maylea (2020).  Drawing upon your learning in the third seminar, consider how Maylea’s contention confirms and/or challenges your emerging identity as a social worker and how it may influence your future practices. (750 words)
Marking criteria & marking guide:
Analysis, 10 marks
This relates to the depth of your analysis of how your learning contributed to your understanding of yourself, others, the sector, and/or course concepts
 Find useful reflective writing phrases HERE and reflective writing prompts HEREReflective practitioner: Deep analysis of how your learning contributed to your understanding of yourself, others, the sector, and/or course concepts 8 - 10
Aware practitioner:  Demonstrates good analysis of the contributions of your learning but keep working to increase depth 7
Beginning reflection: Demonstrates a description of your learning and some beginning analysis – consider how your learning contributes to your understanding of yourself, others, and the sector 6
Not satisfactory: Does not move beyond description of learning 0 – 5
 
Interconnection, 10 marks
This relates to the connections you make with your learning to your past experiences, other courses, the sector, and your future practice
Reflective practitioner: Makes comprehensive connections of your learning with your past experiences, other courses, the sector, and your future practice. 8 - 10
Aware practitioner: Makes good connections of your learning with your past experiences, other courses, the sector, and/or your future practice. 7
Beginning reflection: Shows some awareness of connections in your learning but needs to explore this further 6
Not satisfactory: Does not show awareness of connections in your learning 0 – 5
 
Self-reflection, 10 marks
This relates to your ability to question your own biases, values, preconceptions, and/or assumptions and define new modes of thinking as a result
Reflective practitioner: Demonstrates ability to question your own biases, values, preconceptions, and/or assumptions and define new modes of thinking as a result 8 - 10
Aware practitioner:  Demonstrates ability to question your own biases, values, preconceptions, and/or assumptions but does not show how this will change future thinking 7
Beginning reflection: Demonstrates some attempt at self-reflection, but does not demonstrate a new awareness of personal biases, values, preconceptions and/or assumptions 6
Not satisfactory:  No demonstration of self-reflection of biases, values, etc. 0 – 5
 
Clarity, 10 marks
This relates to the clarity of your explanation, your written expression, and your ability to accurately cite any supporting materials used.
Reflective practitioner: The language is clear and expressive.  Abstract concepts are explained accurately.  Explanation of concepts makes sense to an uninformed reader.  Citations accurately given. 8 - 10
Aware practitioner:  The language and concepts are expressed well, but there are minor errors in spelling, grammar, clarity, and/or citations. 7
Beginning reflection:  There are frequent errors in spelling, grammar, clarity and/or citations that impact on the clarity of your explanation and written expression. 6
Not satisfactory: Language is unclear and confusing throughout.  Concepts are explained inaccurately.  No citations are given where they are necessary. 0 – 5
 

This Management Assignment has been solved by our Management Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
    
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.