Development and Excellence in Professional Practice - Nursing Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Course learning outcomes:
CO1: Operates effectively with and upon a body of knowledge of sufficient depth to begin professional practice
CO2: Is prepared for life-long learning in pursuit of personal development and excellence in professional practice
Criteria Outstanding performance
(75-100%) Exceeds core requirements
(65-74%) Meets core requirements
(50-64%) Does not meet requirements
(<50> High Distinction/ Distinction Credit Pass 1/Pass 2 Fail 1/Fail 2
Topic Analysis
5 marks
Content presented is relevant to the chosen essay topic.
Integrates information drawing from theories covered in course content and references used.
Demonstrates understanding of the chosen topic by comparing and contrasting different points of view (demonstrated within the paragraph dot points).
Content presented is all clearly relevant to the essay topic.
Theories noted in dot points are correctly described or applied. No errors or omissions are present.
Paragraph dot points clearly and comprehensively compare and contrast multiple points of view to demonstrate understanding of the topic. Content presented is relevant to the essay topic. Some minor errors or tangential information may be present.
Theories noted in dot points are correctly described or applied. Very minor errors or omissions may be present, but these do not impede understanding.
Paragraph dot points compare and contrast different points of view to demonstrate understanding of the topic. Content presented is mostly relevant to the essay topic, however some tangential information is presented.
Theories noted in dot points are mostly described or applied correctly. Errors or omissions are present, but these do not greatly impede understanding.
Paragraph dot points begin to compare and contrast different points of view to demonstrate understanding of the topic. Most points present only one viewpoint, however there are occasional mentions of alternate viewpoints. Content presented is not relevant to the essay topic. Content selected is mostly tangential and not related to the topic.
Theories noted in dot points are incorrectly described or applied.
Paragraph dot points do not compare or contrast different points of view to demonstrate understanding of the topic. Only one viewpoint is presented.
Coherence and structure of essay plan
3 marks
Forms an argument, both within each paragraph and across the whole essay plan. Flow of discussion between the different key ideas.
Clear structure to essay plan (introduction, body paragraphs, reference list).
Forms a clear and logical argument within the dot points for each paragraph and across the whole essay plan. Key ideas consistently flow logically and coherently.
Consistently maintains the structure and organisation of the essay plan.
Forms a logical argument within the dot points for most paragraphs and across the whole essay plan. Some minor inconsistencies in argument may be present. Key ideas mostly flow logically.
Maintains the structure and organisation of the essay plan.
Forms a mostly logical argument across the whole essay plan. Many inconsistencies are present within the dot pointed key ideas for paragraphs.
Mostly maintains the structure and organisation of the essay plan. More work is required.
Argument across the whole essay plan does not have a logical structure. Numerous inconsistencies are present within the dot point key ideas for paragraphs.
The structure and organisation of the essay plan is missing.

Criteria Outstanding performance
(75-100%) Exceeds core requirements
(65-74%) Meets core requirements
(50-64%) Does not meet requirements
(<50> High Distinction/ Distinction Credit Pass 1/Pass 2 Fail 1/Fail 2
Relevance of literature
3 marks
Selects peer-reviewed literature that is contemporary (empirical evidence) and relevant to the chosen topic.
Cites evidence from literature appropriately, accurately representing ideas.
Peer-reviewed literature selected is consistently relevant and contemporary (when citing empirical evidence). Seminal sources are also included where appropriate.
Ideas from chosen literature are presented clearly and accurately. No errors or omissions are present. Peer-reviewed literature selected is relevant and contemporary (when citing empirical evidence). Seminal sources are also included where appropriate.
Ideas from chosen literature are presented accurately. Minor errors or omissions of lesser details are present, however do not impede understanding. Peer-reviewed literature selected is mostly relevant and contemporary when citing empirical evidence.
Ideas from chosen literature are mostly presented accurately. Errors or omissions of key details are present, however do not seriously impede understanding. Limited use of peer-reviewed literature, or literature selected is not relevant or contemporary (if citing empirical evidence).
Ideas from chosen literature are not presented accurately. Significant errors or omissions may be present which seriously impede understanding.
Written expression and structure
2 marks
The written expression in the response of is of high quality (free from spelling, grammar and language errors), and is organised and structured in a logical fashion.
Well written and clearly organized using academic style English, characterised by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors.
Above average writing style and logically organised using academic style English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.
Average and/or casual writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.
Poor writing style lacking in academic style English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work.
Referencing (15%)
2 marks
Correctly paraphrases and formats references using the APA 7th edition conventions.
Paraphrases information from sources. No direct quotes.
Correctly cites all articles in text and in reference list. No errors in referencing style. Paraphrases information from sources. No direct quotes.
Correctly cites all articles in text, and in reference list, with very minor errors in referencing style. Mostly paraphrases information from sources. No direct quotes.
Cites most articles in text, and in reference list, however significant errors in referencing style may be present. Information from sources not paraphrased. Incorrect use of direct quotes.
 

This Nursing Assignment has been solved by our Nursing Experts at onlineassignmentbank. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
    
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.