Discovery & Enquiry In Health, Strengths or Weaknesses of Nursing Practice & Future Research - Nursing Assignment Help - Nursing Assignment Help

Assignment Task

Discussion stating the problem and research question
Overview
Choose a topic, develop a problem statement and formulate a research question that critically examines an area of personal interest located within your discipline or course specialization. The format of the research question will fit the type of critical review that suits your topic and problem statement. You will discuss this process and upload the assignment to Turnitin.

Learning outcomes
This assessment task is aligned to the following learning outcomes:
1. Develop a research question and problem statement to guide critical examination of an area of personal interest, located within your discipline or course specialization. 

Instructions
1.Write your assignment as a discussion directed at your peers, including:
a.Your problem statement;
b.The systematic review type that best fits the problem;
c.Your structured question;
d.The question format (e.g. ‘PICO’, ‘PICo’, ‘PEO’) and how the question fits the format;
e.Justification of question format referring to Reading 1.2 by Munn et al. (2018) and your problem statement.
f. Reference/s
2.Post on the Assignment 1 Blackboard discussion forum by the due date. You may like to read and give constructive feedback to other students’ posts.
3.Ensure the assignment is all your own work by posting on the draft submission portal on Turnitin, for checking similarities.
4.Revise if you wish and upload the assignment by the due date to the final assignment portal on Turnitin.
  
Overview
Report on the methods section of the literature search including databases, search strategy, eligibility criteria used to select included studies, and flow chart.

Learning outcomes
The following learning outcomes:
1.Develop a research question and problem statement to guide critical examination of an area of personal interest, located within your discipline or course specialization.
2.Discern between and critique the evidence supporting further research and practice improvement.

Assessment details
The aim of Assignment 2 is to produce a transparent, reproducible Method Section for your literature review. You need to provide sufficient information to allow the reader to replicate the entire search process. Furthermore, in replicating the search process the reader should also be able to arrive at the same number of studies that met the inclusion criteria. 

Introduction: 1000 words
Give a justification for conducting the review specifying what this review will add to the existing literature. Consider: How? Why? What could happen if this important review of information on this topic is not done, distributed, and used? Outline who will benefit (e.g. consumers, carers, professionals, policymakers, and community and society as a whole). Include your problem statement and background to clarify what is already known on your topic and to define relevant key terms/theories. Your research question and an aim should also be included along with, ideally, a thesis statement.
Method: 
You should incorporate your revised Assignment 1 (the Method section) into this critical literature review - to a maximum of 1000 words. You will have used the feedback provided to make any necessary changes to the method.
Result: 
Present a summary of the final included studies in an integrated way including descriptive findings such as the population and their characteristics, designs, counties/settings that studies being conducted.
Provide a more advanced synthesis of the information (e.g. different interventions being used in the studies, comparisons between them, different themes, and key issues emerging).
nclude results table/s, e.g., Table 2 with sample size, the age range of participants, method of data collection, findings, and other relevant study variables. Do not do critically interpret any of the studies in this section (save for Discussion).

Discussion: 
Link to the content of introduction while avoiding repetition; discuss the extent of current knowledge on topic referring to background citations. 
Provide critical interpretation of the key findings while referring to the studies in results table/s (e.g., Table 2) but do not introduce new results in this section (revise Results section if you become aware of new results). Identify current issues, concerns, viewpoints, and arguments.
Comment on the strengths and weaknesses of your methods, the included study designs, and your key findings.
Discuss implications for future research and practice change, and provide justification for your recommendations (e.g. possible study designs or strategies to implement).

This Nursing Assignment has been solved by our Nursing Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.