Highlights
Task Description
RN standard for practice 1.2 requires you to develop practice through reflection on experiences, knowledge, actions, feelings and beliefs to identify how these shape practice (NMBA 2016).
This assessment task requires you to critically reflect on an online simulated scenario and its influence on your future practice. You are encouraged to relate this reflection to your anticipation for your upcoming PEP. ?
What do I need to do?
You will be provided with a choice of video of simulated clinical scenarios (refer to the 'specific content guidance' section below) which will become the foundation of your reflection. You are encouraged to look through all the scenarios to pick one that challenges you.
Once you have chosen ONE scenario to reflect on, you are to write a short paper (1200 words) on the scenario and its influence on your future practice using Driscoll’s (1994) Model of Reflection as the framework. Driscoll’s reflective cycle should be used to guide your reflection with clear delineation between the three reflective steps.
I chose aggressive patient.
Patient story
Introduction to Mr Brown
Michael Brown is a 32 year old male who has a history of alcohol dependence and substance abuse including marijuana and methadone.
He has presented to the emergency department this afternoon complaining of acute abdominal pain. The pain is rated at 7/10 and is sharp in nature and has been present since last night and is getting worse. It started out being generalised over the abdomen and around the umbilicus but is now moving to the right side of his abdomen. He has felt nauseous but has not vomited.
He has no known family or next of kin and lives in a sheltered accommodation in Brunswick. He is currently unemployed.
Past Medical History
Medications
Nil
Task format
Driscoll’s reflective cycle should be used with clear delineation between the three reflective steps. We suggest you use the three steps as headings ('What', 'So what' and 'Now what') with a short introduction and conclusion.
1st paragraph: Introduction: 50 words
2nd paragraph: 150 words
What: Under this heading, give a brief description of the scenario you chose to reflect on. In order for this to be a brief description, it is likely that it will be an aspect of the scenario. This should be something that challenged you on a professional or personal level about the scenario. References are not required for this section.
3rd paragraph: 450 words
So what: This is an analysis of the event and you will devote a greater portion of your writing to this section. Under this heading, you will need to describe how your chosen simulation made you feel. You will need to analyse why it made you feel like this, with reference to your upcoming PEP. While referring to PEP, you are encouraged to remain anchored on the scenario you have chosen. Remember, the link to PEP is more about how the experience of working as a student nurse (and your progression towards registration) makes you feel. This section will typically be more heavily referenced. Remember, you are analysing your reaction and feelings towards a simulation, and your references should reflect this.
4th paragraph: 500 word
Now what: You should identify what the main learning is that you took from reflecting on your reaction to this simulation. To help inform your written reflection in this section, think about the following:
Again, this section will have references. As this section focuses more on the impact this exercise has had on your development as a student nurse, this section will likely include reference to standards that guide nursing practice.
5th paragraph: Conclusion: 50 words
Assessment Criteria
Criterion 1
Demonstrate an ability to critically reflect on practice using Driscoll’s (1994) model of reflection
Has all of the following: Excellent adherence to each reflective stage. Each reflective stage expertly builds on previous stage. Expertly embeds insights into own practice throughout reflection.
Criterion 2
Relate reflection back to two key areas within practice which can be improved and identifies strategies to improve practice.
Has all of the following: The two areas chosen explicitly link to student's progression within a professional standards framework. Clearly articulated strategies for improvement. Excellent reference to relevant literature and Evidence Based Practice (EBP).
Criterion 3
Communicate effectively using a well-structured and concise writing style.
Has all of the following: Exceptional sentence and paragraph structure. No grammatical or spelling errors. Within word count.
Criterion 4
Reference correctly using the Harvard Referencing system.
Has all of the following: Demonstrates wide engagement with the literature through the inclusion of multiple scholarly sources to support writing. Accurately references all sources using Harvard UTAS referencing style. No inconsistencies in reference list and intext.
This Medical Science has been solved by our Phd Expert at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing Style.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered.You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turn tin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.