Highlights
Figure 1: GDP, Current US$ Note. From World Bank Data (WBD 2018)
The liquidity crisis resulted in an over 5% decrease in annual GDP growth. Korean government reacted quickly to the predicament with main measures as follows: 1 Applied a bailout of USD58.3 billion loan by the IMF to restructure and modernize the economy (Martin 2011);
Figure 2: Government Spending, per cent of GDP Note. From the Global Economy 2018
Increased government spending and cut taxes to revitalize the economy; 3 Immediately closed the most troubled financial institutions, helped to restructure and recapitalize some weak but solvent institutions (Martin 2011); 4 Deposit insurance system funded by government-guaranteed bonds to protect depositors and prevent bank runs (Hye &Edo 2008).
Figure 3: GDP growth rate Note. From World Bank Data (WBD 2018)
Figure 3 reflects that after the 7% shrinking of the South Korean economy in 1998, the GDP growth rate rapidly increased over 10%. Compared with other Asian countries heavily affected by AFC, Korea was the first to recover. GDP growth remained relatively stable for a decade, despite 2001, which was a problematic year due to the end of the boom in the Information and Communications Technology industry and the attacks on the World Trade Centre in New York (Hye &Edo 2008). There was also a drastic drop in 2008 because of the GFC. One of the main reasons for the overall improvement of the country’s GDP is increasing spending on Research &Development (R&D). Since the AFC, Korea has promoted the development of high technology into the national strategy. Chart 1 suggests that compared to average OCED countries, Korea’s spending in R&D occupied an increasing part of GDP. Through technology innovation and industrial upgrading, South Korea’s electronics, automobile and steel industry have achieved new leaps (Blooming 2015). Policy recommendations (a) Downward Economy The previous discussions suggest that though the Korean economy performed relatively well in the past 20 years, it was now in a down on the whole. The economy is experiencing a very low growth in GDP and even decrease in export. It is reasonable for the government to enhance the international above question competitiveness of export. Fiscal Policy: 1 Further, improve the export subsidies to reduce marketing costs; 2 Provide export credit insurance, finance and the promotional activities to stimulate exports (WTO n.d.). Trade Policy: 1 Further, pursue comprehensive free-trade agreements with major trading partners or regional groups; 2 Reduce the customs tariff to attract investments and expenditures. In the meantime, it is vital to stimulate the overall productivity of the country. Suggestions are as follows: 1 Increase in government spending. 2 Increase the transfer payment and cut the tax to relief the contraction (Ben, Nilss & Robert 2014). Using the Keynesian Model, we can simply illustrate the principle:This Accounting And Finance Assessment has been solved by our Accounting And Finance experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our This Accounting And Finance Assessment has been solved by our Accounting And Finance experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style. Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.