Consider a 5-year bond with annual coupon payments. The bond has a face value (prin- cipal) of $100 and sells for $95. Its coupon rate is 3%. (The coupon rate is the ratio between the coupon value and the face value). The face value is paid at the maturity year in addition to the last coupon payment.
This part was extracted from the balance sheet of the First Bank of Australia:
|
Assets |
(Billion |
AUD) |
Liabilities (Billion AUD) |
|
Bond |
80 |
Fixed-rate liabilities 60 |
|
where “Bond” here refers to the bond we specified above and the fixed-rate liabilities (banks future payment obligations) have an average duration of 4 years and YTM of 3%. Their YTM changes in the same way as a 5-year T-bill interest rate.
BHP Billiton, the leading Australian iron ore mining giant, is listed on New York Stock Exchange. The iron ore prices have almost doubled from $67.87 on 3 August 2018 to
$123.16 on 3 July 2019. The following table shows BHP stock prices in $ and the an- nualised historical volatility (Vol.) of BHP, VIX Index, the iron ore prices in $ at given dates. For simplicity, we assume one price, i.e., no bid-ask spread.
|
Date |
BHP stock |
price |
Vol.(%) |
VIX |
Iron ore price |
|
3 Jul 2019 |
58.93 |
19.5 |
12.6 |
123.16 |
|
|
3 Jun 2019 |
52.38 |
18.9 |
18.9 |
93.97 |
|
|
3 May 2019 |
52.81 |
17.1 |
12.9 |
89.15 |
|
|
3 Apr 2019 |
56.30 |
19.3 |
13.7 |
87.60 |
|
|
4 Mar 2019 |
52.79 |
16.4 |
14.6 |
78.98 |
|
|
4 Feb 2019 |
51.12 |
35.3 |
15.7 |
77.85 |
|
|
3 Jan 2019 |
46.39 |
33.9 |
16.4 |
74.30 |
|
|
3 Dec 2018 |
46.50 |
36.3 |
20.0 |
67.82 |
|
|
5 Nov 2018 |
48.40 |
32.4 |
14.2 |
74.17 |
|
|
4 Oct 2018 |
50.01 |
23.2 |
13.2 |
70.79 |
|
|
4 Sep 2018 |
47.24 |
27.6 |
11.6 |
68.28 |
|
|
3 Aug 2018 |
50.38 |
31.2 |
16.1 |
67.87 |
|
A European call option on BHP stock that expired on 3 Jan 2020 and had a strike price of $65 was traded at $1.46 on 3 July 2019. A European put option on BHP stock that expired on 3 Jan 2020 and had a strike price of $65 was traded at $8.55 on 3 July 2019. The annual risk-free rate of interest was 2.15%. Using what you learnt from the course, answer the following questions. Use discrete compounding if you need to compute semi-annual interest rate.
Option pricing methodology is often used in complex real project valuations which allow for business investment opportunities throughout the life-time of the project. Using a simple net present value (NPV) analysis for these projects may lead an incorrect valuation because NPV does not account for flexibility of investment options.
Here is a specific example inspired by the article Sick and Gamba (2010). Suppose you are a consultant hired by a local government. The government needs to raise some cash now and hired you to determine the proper value of a three-year development concession for a specific gold-mine which has 1 million ounces of gold reserves. It is known from past practices that the gold can all be immediately produced in the year when the investment is made for a combined capital and operating cost of $290 million (this amount does not change within the three years). It is costly to store gold and it needs to be sold immediately after it is produced. Abstract from any additional financial instruments which can be used for hedging as if they are fairly priced they will not improve our real option. A company who purchases the concession will have the right to develop the mine for the period of concession and will bear no additional tax obligations. An initial gold price is $300 per ounce. From the analysis of historical data you know that gold price will rise by 20% over a year with a probability of 0.65 and it will fall by 20% with a probability of 0.35. The riskless discount rate is 6% and the company has can develop now, or defer for either one or two years, after which point the opportunity to invest is lost (concession expires). The government asked you to produce valuation of this project from the perspective of the company (not including the concession fee since its value is not decided yet). You were asked to assume that the company is risk-neutral.
You produce the figure above to explain your reasoning. It is analogous to American option pricing. If immediately developed, the NPV of the project is $10 million, but because the concession is valid for three periods (including period 0), the government should charge a higher fee.
Suppose that instead of atomic (Arrow-Debreu) securities there are three linearly independent securities, a riskless bond, a stock, and a one-period put option on this stock available for trade in this economy. The riskless bond pays 1 apple in every state, the stock pays 2, 1 and 0 apples in G, F and B, respectively. The put option has a strike price of 1.
Suppose the risk-free rate of return is 0.03. Market portfolio expected return is 0.10 and its risk measured by standard deviation is 0.05.
There are two investors in the economy. Their expected utility functions are given by:
Eu = e ? s2/ti, for i = 1, 2, where risk tolerance t1 = 1 and t2 = 0.5.
This Finance Assignment Help has been solved by our Finance experts at onlineassignmentbank. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.