Highlights
Question 1
Suppose we wish to estimate the relationship between food expenditure and some of its determinants. The file Foodexp.xlsx contains 200 observations from a cross-section of households for the following variables.
Foodexpi: Weekly expenditure on food (excluding restaurants) in dollars.
Income: Weekly household income in dollars.
Children: Number of dependent children living in the household.
Retired: A binary (0/1) indicator of whether the head of the household is retired {ret.=1}.
(a) Consider a regression model
Foodexp = β0 + β1 log(Income )+β2 Children + β3 Retiredi + ε
Estimate the model using Eviews and provide the summary results (A summary results should include fitted equation with coefficients, standard error, t-statistic, p-value, sample size, F-statistic and R-squared).
(b) Interpret the coefficient estimates and their significance at the 5% significance level. [4 marks]
(c) Does the sign of the coefficients agree with your expectations? Comment.
(d) Based on the regression output, if Income increases by 10% what is the estimated change in Foodexp, holding Children and Retired constant. [4 marks]
(e) Test the overall validity of the regression model at the 5% significance level. State the hypotheses, restricted and unrestricted model, test statistics and its distribution when null hypothesis is true, critical value, and your conclusion.
(f) Construct 95% confidence interval for β , the slope of the log(Income) variable and interpret your results.
(g) Based on your answer in part (f), without performing a hypothesis test, would you reject the hypothesis H:β = 100, H:β ≠ 100. Explain? [4 marks]
(h) Plot the least squares residuals against log(Income) and comment on the pattern. Is there any evidence of heteroscedasticity? [4 marks]
(i) Test for the existence of heteroscedasticity at the 5% significance level. Use the Breusch-Pagan-Godfrey test and attach your Eviews results. Clearly states all steps in your test; null and alternative hypotheses, the auxiliary regression and the test statistic, critical value, your decision and the conclusion. [6 marks]
(j) Re-estimate your model with robust standard errors and attach your Eviews output. Compare your results with the output in part (a). Comment. [4 marks]
(k) Now run the following regression model:
Foodexp = α + α log(Income) + e
(l) Compare your model that with part (a). Which model would you choose? And Why?
Question 2
A researcher wants to analyse the relationship between the three-month T-bill rate, tb3, the annual inflation rate, inf based on the consumer price index, and the federal budget deficit, def as a percentage of GDP and develops the following model. The data is stored under the file name is intdef_A.xlsx
tb3 = α + α inf + α def + ε
(a) Use Eviews to obtain a line plot among these three variables (one graph) and comment on the plot. (Hint: to make the graph in Eviews: Quick → Graph → tb3 inf def →Ok →Line & Symbol → OK.)
(b) Obtain sample correlation coefficient between these variables and comment on the strength of the relationships? (Hint: to obtain correlation in Eviews: Quick → Group Statistics → Correlations → tb3 inf def → Ok.)
(c) Estimate the above regression model and provide the Eviews output.
(d) Interpret the coefficients α and α . Does the sign of the coefficients agree with your expectations? Explain.
(e) Provide and interpret the coefficient of determination, R .
(f) Plot the residuals of the model and comment on any pattern.
(g) Add a one lag of inf and def to the equation in part (a) and re-estimate your model. and report the result. Are the coefficients for the two lag variables individually significant at the 5% level? To add lag variables in Eviews type inf(-1) def(-1)
(h) Conduct the second order autocorrelation test for the model in part (c) at the 5% significance level. Attach your Eviews results. Clearly states all steps in your test; Null and alternative hypotheses, the auxiliary regression and the test statistic, critical value, your decision and the conclusion.
(i) Re-estimate your model with Newey-West standard errors and provide your output. Compare your results with the output in part (c). Comment.
This ECON6034: Economics Assignment has been solved by our Economics Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.