Highlights
Task:
The assessment task (2000 words): Using two newspaper articles/professional publications (see below), and drawing on the Whitin & Whitin (2011) framework, critically analyse and discuss how the ‘findings’ or ‘outcomes’ of a standardised test/survey were used to persuade the public or the profession of a particular point of view. Reflect on how you will integrate what you learned from this assignment into your own critical philosophical position on standardised tests or standardised achievement goals. Articles (Primary and Secondary)
1. The NAPLAN is trying to do too much. By Vanessa Fernandes. August 31, 2020. LINK: https://theconversation.com/the-naplan-is-trying-to-do-too-much-it-needs-urgentreform-to-be-a-diagnostic-test-only-144852 2. A year without NAPLAN. By Ilana Finefter-Rosenbluh. December 2, 2020. LINK: https://theconversation.com/a-year-without-naplan-has-given-us-a-chance-to-reevaluate-how-we-gauge-school-quality-138603 Alternative Articles (Early Childhood students only) (however EC students can instead choose to analyse the articles for Primary and Secondary (above) if they wish) 1. Gaps in education data. Stacey Fox and Meaghan O’Connell Sept 19, 2016. https://theconversation.com/gaps-in-education-data-there-are-many-questions-for-whichwe-dont-have-accurate-answers-65241 2. 1 in 5 kids start school with health or emotional difficulties. Meredith O’Connor, Jon Quach, Sharon Goldfield.
1. Why is competence in evaluating and interpreting data sets important for a professional educator in current times? (i.e. why do professional educators need to be able to accurately interpret NAPLAN/AEDC/TIMMS/PISA results?).
2. Briefly present all arguments for and against NAPLAN/AEDC is presented by the author/s in each of the two articles.
3. Using the Whitin & Whitin (2011) principles for your critical analysis, identify and discuss points you consider to be problematic/inaccurate/missing in each of the two articles . Consider at least two or more of the following points to support your analysis and discussion:
• what data NAPLAN/AEDC collects and how it is collected,
• when NAPLAN/AEDC data is collected and when the data are available,
• the ways that NAPLAN/AEDC is or can be analysed,
• the ways it can or could be interpreted and used by policy makers/teachers/parents
, • the ways in which these interpretations and/or uses could impact on students.
4. Reflect on the critical perspective you have developed from doing this assignment and the ways in which this has influenced your philosophical position on the impact of standardised tests or standardised achievement goals on education.
This EEE755 Management Assignment has been solved by our Management experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.