Enjoy Upto 30% off on all Your Assignments ORDER NOW
+61480015851 whatsapp white icon +61480015851 info@myassignmentservices.com

EFDP1001: Engineering Foundations - Design Evaluation Report Writing Assessment Answer

Download Solution Order New Solution

Highlights

Internal Code: 1AGJBB Code: EFDP1001

Design Evaluation Report Writing Assessment Answer

Assignment Task: EFDP1001 Activity: The purpose of the design evaluation report is to determine how well you understand the process of creating a conceptual design based on the requirement specifications provided by a client, evaluating the conceptual designs against a set of criteria and constraints, and choosing the best one for implementation at the client’s site. Since your team must provide the best solution, keeping in mind who the ultimate client is and not a solution for someone living in Perth, it is important to know if you obtain the capability of evaluating a concept independently from your teammates. For a detailed Assessment description and specification of work to be done see briefing sheets located on Moodle in the “Assessments: #3 - Design Evaluation Report” tab. Assessment criteria and marking distribution and Engineers Australia competencies addressed Value of the assessment based on the rubric provided below: EFDP1001
  • Assessment Mark: 100 marks
  • Assessment Weighting: 35%
The total assessment mark awarded is made up of the points awarded to each element assessed. EFDP1001 Each item of the assessment in the rubric shows the EA competencies (ENGINEERS AUSTRALIA Stage 1 competencies) to be demonstrated. ‘Level of thinking’ is specified for those elements of the assignment when it is appropriate. Detailed guidelines and feedback - EFDP1001 This detailed assessment rubric sets out assessment expectations so that you will be aware of the competencies to be developed and the expected standards. This table will also be used for assessing your work to provide sufficient feedback on how you performed against these standards. Feedback will be provided on rubrics attached to your TurnItIn or Moodle submission. REPORT FORMAT - EFDP1001 The Design Evaluation Report will be marked out of 100 marks and will be 35% of your overall percentage marks for the unit. It will basically describe and evaluate a proposed conceptual design as a possible solution to your group’s problem. As a result, the structure of your report should be:
  • Cover
  • Executive Summary
  • Contents Page
  • Introduction
  • Conceptual Design
  • Evaluation of Conceptual Deign
  • Conclusion
  • References
  • Appendix
o Individual Reflection - EFDP1001 Below is a description of each part.
  • Cover Page
A page with: EFDP1001
  • Project, unit and Curtin logo present,
  • Author, student ID, company name and date of submission
  • A relevant picture relating to this submission
EFDP1001 Engineering Foundations: Design and Processes o Explanation of the theory behind the conceptual design. This may include answering questions such as: EFDP1001 (1) why does the conceptual design work? and (2) Are there equations that govern a process used in the conceptual design? If it has been used and proven to work in another location, it is advantageous to cite that in this subsection. o What improvements have you made to the design (if it was implemented in another location) to meet the design criteria or how did you adapt the theory to meet the design criteria. o Explain the refined conceptual design and how it works. If there are multiple parts, you might want to explain how each part works. The marking for this section will be based on: Section 1: Conceptual Designs - EFDP1001
  • 1 quality conceptual design is clearly identified and described. The description must include:
o The theory behind the conceptual design o Improvements made to an existing product on the market to meet the design criteria or how the theory was adapted to meet the design criteria o Explanation of refined conceptual design and how it works.
  • Engineering graphics to illustrate the concept that:
o Effectively present relevant information. Overall dimensions of concept must be included.
  • Every argument must be supported by at least 2 credible references
EFDP1001 Engineering Foundations: Design and Processes conceptual design. Sustainability concerns include areas such as economic, cultural, and environmental. Explanation of the weighting scheme will be given during the lecture. An example of an explanation and justification of a design criterion with its weighting, and an evaluation of the conceptual design according to the design criterion (ex: sub-criterion of Ease of Operation relating to needed farming tools) may look like the following: 3.1.1 Design Criteria - EFDP1001 Ease of operation is part of the operational criteria and is characterized ideally by the following traits: (1) the equipment must be able to operate manually with no electricity or power can be used for the design; (2) the design must be simple and straightforward to ensure that it is a skill that can be taught to younger generations. This includes ensuring that it does not take any extreme effort or strength for the farmers to be able to operate, given that most are women; (3) the design should be relatively lightweight and hence easy to carry, transport and be put away for storage; and (4) the equipment should be able to withstand and operate under harsh conditions including extreme humidity and heat, so it can be used throughout the year for any season, should the equipment be required (Lee et al 2016) 3.1.2 Justification of Weighting - EFDP1001  Ease of Operation is a small factor to consider in the design and therefore is given a weighting of 5%. The tool will be a lot more beneficial and effective if the design is not too technical, and has a simple but effective function. Although women are the primary farmers at the camp (Oppong and Gritzner 2008), child labor is still used (UNHCR 2002). As a result, a design that is easy to operate and only requires one action or motion will be easier to integrate into the current ways of farming. 3.1.3 Justification of Score - EFDP1001 The operation of the device is particularly simple, as it only requires a pushing motion. As previously mentioned, the push-plow is lightweight and has wheels. The ease of operation in the design was also considered when choosing the angle of inclination of the handles, as stated in Section 2.4 - Handles. This allows for it to be pushed more easily across the soil. Therefore, it is suitable for both women and children to use. The non- adjustable height of the plough can cause problems, as it is fixed at 0.9m above the ground (Figure 2). As explained in Section 2.2 – Structure and Dimensions, the height was chosen based on the average height of Zambian women. Despite this, shorter children may have difficulty applying enough force into the handle. In addition, it is not known whether the 180° rotation explained in Section 2.4 - Handles will work seamlessly with the fixed, parallel wheel system. Although it was tested with a small model, the real materials, friction and weight, make it difficult to determine if the pivoting action will be successful. Therefore, despite the high ease of operation, marks were deducted for the possible difficulties, resulting in a score of 6/10. An example of the table summarizing the scores from the evaluation of conceptual design (ex: New methods of road construction) may look like the following: EFDP1001 Engineering Foundations: Design and Processes Table 1: Summary of Scores from an Evaluation of a Conceptual Design The marking for this section will be based on: Section 2: Evaluation of Conceptual Design - EFDP1001
  • All Design Criteria listed in detail with weighting
  • The weighting of each criterion is justified. Evidence must be provided.
  • The evaluation addresses all elements of all criteria & supports the score. Evidence must be provided
  • Evaluation of Conceptual Design is summarised in a table
Important: Ensure this section demonstrates an understanding of sustainability (economic, cultural, environmental) and safety Every argument must be supported by credible references. Submission Process: EFDP1001 Your work will be submitted electronically as a PDF file on Moodle. You will find a link labeled “Submission Link: Design Evaluation Report”. Turnitin is a tool that is used to check for the possibility of plagiarism for any submitted student work. When you submit your work to Turnitin, you will receive an originality report with a percentage. Turnitin will compare your work to its huge database of work across international campuses, across publicly available documents on the internet, and against documents submitted by previous students in this unit and will return to you a percentage. The higher the percentage, the more likely that your work was not paraphrased or referenced correctly, and thus the higher the chance that your work is plagiarized. A percentage of 20% or higher will cause people to take notice. As a result, you will need to be cautious of what you submit. It is advised that you submit your work through the practice Turnitin submission link to know what your score is prior to an official submission. The practice link will allow you the option to rephrase the parts of your report that are highlighted prior to an official submission. At Curtin, plagiarism is taken seriously, and the consequences can be as harsh as removal from the university.
This EFDP1001: Design Evaluation Report Writing Assessment has been solved by our Report Writing experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Get It Done! Today

Country
Applicable Time Zone is AEST [Sydney, NSW] (GMT+11)
+

Every Assignment. Every Solution. Instantly. Deadline Ahead? Grab Your Sample Now.

Find My Solution

© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.