Highlights
Task:
Abstract
Background and Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate current evidence and provide a review on the effects of isometric, eccentric, or heavy slow resistance (HSR) exercises on pain and function in individuals with patellar tendinopathy (PT).
Methods:
Academic journals from CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, Scopus, SPORTDiscusTM, and The Cochrane Library were searched from inception to August 2017. Screening of reference lists was also performed. Human interventional studies investigating outcomes of pain and function in PT using either isometric, eccentric, or HSR training exercises were included. The McMaster Critical Review Form?Quantita- tive Studies was used to assess for risk of bias. Levels of evidence were obtained using the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) evidence hierarchy. The NHMRC Body of Evidence Framework was utilized to formulate recommen- dations for clinical practice. Extraction of data was performed by two independent reviewers according to predefined data criterion, data were then tabulated, and a descriptive, qualitative data synthesis was performed.
Results: Fifteen studies (3 isometric, 2 HSR, and 10 eccentric) were included for this review. Mean quality score across all studies was 81.6% (range 70% to 93%). Nine studies were of high quality, whereas six studies were of moderate quality. Nine studies were randomized controlled trials, which provided good Level II evidence; four studies were of satisfactory Level III evidence; and two studies were case series (Level IV evidence).
METHODS
2.1 | Protocol and registration
The systematic review was undertaken in accordance with the proto- col guidelines outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic
Reviews and Meta?Analyses statement and was registered on August 12, 2017, with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO# CRD42017074286).
2.2 | Eligibility criteria
Articles reporting at least one of the outcomes of pain and/or function in PT were included. Human interventional studies investigating iso- metric, eccentric, or HSR training exercises in PT were also included. Studies that were not written in English language, did not have full text available, or did not include any participants with tendinopathy were excluded. Any studies that had invasive interventions (for exam- ple, injections or surgery) were also excluded. Other exclusion criteria included non?peer?reviewed studies, clinical commentaries, and reviews.
This Health Assignment has been solved by our Health Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.
Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment Experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.
© Copyright 2026 My Uni Papers – Student Hustle Made Hassle Free. All rights reserved.