EGH420 - Design Final Report Outline and CRAs - Engineering Client Design Summary Brief - Engineering Assessment Answer

EGH420:  Design Final Report Outline and CRAs Assessment Answer

Assessment Task:

1. Outline You are tasked with designing one of the engineering systems outlined in the Assessment area of the EGH420 Blackboard site. The topic you work on is at the discretion of your team. The purpose of the project is to complete a full design lifecycle on the system and deliver a complete engineering design solution and analysis report, full costing, all purchase lists, and detailed manufacturing drawings. Your design should be such that the test apparatus is safe, durable, and fit for purpose, and your engineering analysis should provide adequate evidence of this.  In the second phase of the project, you will document your completed design and analysis carried out through several document types as might be prepared by an engineering design consulting firm. The associated required submissions are as follows:

•  5-page engineering client design summary brief (group, scaled) 7.5%
•  Complete manufacturing specifications, purchasing lists, and costings (group, scaled) 10% ? Detailed analysis documentation appendix o Summary of content, purpose, and coverage with index at beginning (group, scaled) 2.5% o System and element level analysis summaries (individual) 25%
•  Weighting factor appendix (used to distribute group marks as before)
•  Teamwork reflection (individual, submitted separately) 5% 

The detailed design documents (first 4 points) should be combined into a single document and submitted by a representative team member (1 per team), while the teamwork reflections should be submitted separately by every student as was the case in the proposal phase. 
The following sections outline the requirements for each section / assessable component, and detail of the specific marking expectations are provided in the CRA rubrics that follow

2. Engineering Client Design Summary Brief 

You are to provide a 5-page summary of your finalized design and key analysis carried out as might be appropriate to provide to a client in practice. It should be viewed as an extended executive summary with extremely high emphasis on strong pictorial communication, all critical details and numbers summarized, and high-value interpretation of results provided. The document should be exceptionally concise and well-edited, providing the client with all important pieces of information, and with absolutely no padding or redundancy. At least half of each page should be consumed by images and you are welcome to use either 1 or 2 column formats as appropriate. The document should use 11pt font, have reasonable margins (>1cm around), correct figure and table captioning, and referencing where appropriate (IEEE). Be mindful that annotations on any figures should be easily readable and images should be produced at a high resolution. The following is the suggested layout of the brief, although some teams may opt for an alternative communication strategy if it fits a particular design better.

1. A title for the document/design, team number (1.1, 2.3, …, 6.7, etc.), and team member names occupying the first several lines of the document (i.e. like would be used on a poster, not a dedicated title page as this would be a waste of a page). Each subsequent section should have a brief heading and numbering (i.e. 1. Background, 2. Design Summary, 3. Key Design Analysis, 4. Conclusions and Recommendations, etc.) and all white space should be removed (i.e. don’t start sections on new pages leaving gaps on the previous page)

. 2. Background: A brief background and problem statement. Approximately 2 short paragraphs summarizing the problem and aims of the design project. A table summarizing design criteria may also be valuable.

3. Design Summary: A section summarizing the final design. This section should communicate the final design in as much detail as possible, and including key features, assumptions, any important innovations, operational ranges, and detailed summary of the system, sub-systems, and key elements. Use assembly drawings and cutaways, well-annotated assembly explosions for systems or sub-systems, and a brief table of costings (don’t include borders or title blocks on drawings, cut them out and include like a book figure). A statement on the use of the apparatus and safety features and compliance is also required.

4. Key Design Analysis: A summary of any key system and element level analyses done. Highlight the forces or range of forces in the system with strong and well laid out FBDs or system-level diagrams that indicate the source of key loadings. Choose the 2 most critical components and summarize the detailed analysis in terms of composite and annotated ANSYS/Fluent contour plots (i.e. overall contour with boxed and blown out enlarged zones of interest, legible contour key, highlighted critical zone, arrows and notes to important features, etc.), results from hand calculations and standards applied, and justification of confidence in the design. More briefly summarize all other analysis carried out as well (i.e. including the 2 most critical and all other components) possibly in a table showing component name (as per earlier diagrams from 3.), loading classification/comment, maximum stress, life, safety factor, etc. for each part.

5. Conclusions and Recommendations: Conclude by summarizing the strengths of the design proposed, and detailing any future work or additional improvements that your team has identified, if the design was to be implemented and subsequently improved upon.

3. Complete Manufacturing Specifications,

Purchasing Lists, and Costings You are required to provide detailed manufacturers specifications, as well as all purchasing lists for off-the-shelf components. You must also evaluate costings of every component, whether they are to be manufactured (materials costs and manufacturing labor), or purchased outright. The section should involve the following: 
1. Manufacturing specifications: Detailed technical drawings of every system and element to be manufactured and adhering to the AS1100.201-1992(R2014) conventions for mechanical engineering technical drawings. The drawings should follow a clear hierarchical sequence with drawing numbering and reference to drawing numbers used throughout (i.e. if a composite welded part combines

4 individual parts, the bill-of-materials should include both the name of the 4 parts and the specific drawing number where that part can be found). Reference materials and details on expected drawing type and layout will be provided in lectures, but the sequence should roughly match the following hierarchy:  

a. Overall system assembly drawing with cut-away details as necessary to allow understanding of whole system integration. No dimensions, only for understanding purposes. If self-contained sub-systems exist, include labeling (balloon numbering) and bill-of-materials for each sub-system with an indication of sub-system drawing. ]

b. Either whole system (in the absence of self-contained sub-systems) or sub-system assembly explosion drawings with full balloon numbering and bill-of-materials listing part name, count and drawing number of each constituent part.

c. If any composite parts exist (i.e. parts assembled by welding separate parts together), provide a technical drawing with full orthographic projection and isometric view of the whole part in composite form (i.e. as it would be after welding). Any dimensions should only be included to facilitate positioning during welding. All welds should be indicated with weld size and type annotations. Every constituent individual part should be balloon numbered and included in a bill-of-materials including part name, number, and subsequent drawing number. d. Every individual part should have its own full manufacturing drawing. This includes orthographic projection with every dimension indicated, isometric view for context, any appropriate cut-away details, and an annotated list staring with the initial blank of the material to be used including material type, and all subsequent manufacturing processes to be applied in the sequence that they are applied (e.g. for a shaft:

1. 30mm diameter x 150mm long 4140 round bar used,

2. Shaft rough profiled on lathe,

3. Bearing surfaces precision machined to tolerance on lathe,

4. Keyways cut on 4-axis CNC mill, 5. Spline cut using broaching tool on 4-axis CNC mill, etc.). In your dimensioning, any surface requiring a specific tolerance must be indicated accordingly (e.g. bearing surfaces, any surfaces requiring smooth, transition or interference fit, etc.).

2. Purchasing lists: These should include every part to be purchased, how many needed model/catalog/item number, price, and supplier. Concise images would be valuable.

3. Full costings summarized in a table. The table could include headings like: part description (match your drawings), count, material cost (leave blank if purchasing off-the-shelf), approximate manufacturing cost (leave blank if purchasing off-the-shelf), component purchase price (leave blank in manufacturing), supplier. Include column totals and overall price estimate for your design.

This EGH420: Engineering Assessment has been solved by our Engineering experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.