ENEG20001 - Historical Impact of Engineering - Professionalism and Ethics - Risk Management Strategies - Reflective Writing Assignment Help

Assignment Task

ENEG20001: AUSTRALIAN ENGINEERING PRACTICE

Learning Outcome 1: Explain the historical impact of engineering on society
1a. Carry out some individual research on at least one engineer who had a positive impact on society. By considering a major project that this engineer completed, reflect on the skills that they had in addition to technical skills.
1b. Carry out some individual research on at least one engineering project that went wrong and resulted in the loss of life. Were appropriate risk management strategies were in place? What would you have done differently?

Learning Outcome 2: Explain engineering professionalism and ethics in the Australian context
2a. You should be thinking about the skills and knowledge that expert engineers have in addition to their technical skills. Based on the textbook readings, reflect on the tasks you expect to perform as an engineer in Australia. What new competencies do you realize that you need to have? What would you say is the value that you could add to an engineering organization?
2b. Carry out a self-assessment against the Stage 1 Competencies and reflect on your current stage of achievement. You will find the self-assessment in the Moodle site.
2c. All members of Engineers Australia commit to practice according to the Code of Ethics. Briefly discuss what the Code of Ethics means to you. What would you do if your boss asked you to lie for them? What about if a customer was behaving in an unethical manner?

Reflective writing on studying at university
Foreword:
This example is not without errors but is generally of a high standard. This was prepared for a different unit/course on a different topic so the contents may not be relevant to the learning outcome/assessment criteria of this unit. However, if you find the contents interesting, I encourage you to read the book carefully and follow this sample, which may assist you in writing your reflective writing/paper. Finally, I would like to thank the student who kindly agreed to share their Reflective Paper.

What?
As an engineer, when undertaking a project, it is your responsibility to consider not only the technical aspects of the project but also the non-technical aspects. Large-scale projects such as the Panama Canal (Cadbury, 2004) require extensive planning, designing, teamwork, communication and research in order to be executed correctly. Additionally, due to their size, they often have the possibility to have large and potentially devastating effects on the environment, community, economy, and local and global politics. Therefore, modern engineers are required to consider and account for these factors, as well as the technical designing and construction of the project, in order to try and achieve the most effective, efficient, and usable structure.

So what?
During the designing and construction of the Panama Canal, there were numerous stakeholders involved. Some of the most notable include, De Lesseps, all the other designers/engineers involved, the investors who sponsored the canal, and the workers who labored to build the canal. As for De Lesseps, his involvement as a stakeholder would not be much different in modern times compared to the 1800s and 1900s. He was the mastermind of the Canal, the Project Manager. All mistakes and unaccounted for accidents fall back on him, as it is his responsibility to constantly ensure that every facet of the project is going to plan and that every individual party involved is correctly doing their job to ensure the success of the project. The only difference between De Lesseps involvement in the 19th Century, and if he were to be designing the Canal now, is that he would be held much more accountable for his actions and for his lack of planning. The repercussions of a project like this in a modern society would be devastating, as it would not only help to ruin an already unbalanced economy, but it would also destroy a unique and thriving environment and have an almost unparalleled social impact due to the numerous injuries, illnesses, and deaths. Investors’ involvement would not vary much either, as they would still lose their money, and the surrounding economy could still be greatly affected. There is a chance for these investors to try to regain their money by using the company; however, in a large-scale operation such as this, it is unlikely. This is because many other stakeholders would most likely lose their money and want to sue, and the company most likely would be having financial difficulty and be unable to re-pay all investors. In comparison, the involvement and effects of the workers would be considerably different. In modern times, there have been certain national and international standards put in place to not only help ensure the success of the project but to also help protect all involved parties. One key example of this is the Work Health and Safety Act 2011. According to this legislation, every member of the workforce has the responsibility to maintain and improve the safety of his or her own workplace. However, if the risk is too high, workers have the right to refuse to enter the worksite to ensure their personal safety.

What else?
Engineers are often innovating and introducing new ideas and methods to achieve something. These new methods may be quicker, safer, and more cost-effective or just all-around more efficient; either way, innovation is an important part of being an engineer. However, when working with other involved parties, their views and opinions must be considered in the innovation process. These stakeholders’ opinions can often point out flaws in a new method or processor can coincide with a social, political or environmental area. In the case of the Panama Canal, many innovative methods of construction would have been discarded had the stakeholder's views been taken into account. Many of these processes adversely affected the labors who were hired to build the canal, as they not only added work, time and cost but also heightened the risk of danger.

What now?
Through reflection, it is evident that the role of a professional engineer has changed since the Panama Canal. During that time, the main focus of an engineering project was the actual construction of the project, the completion of the structure. Social, economic and environmental effects were often not considered. In the case of the Panama Canal, not only were they unapologetic with the removal treatment of the surrounding flora, but they also did not consider the social impacts that the labours would encounter, such as loss of morale due to constant failure, loss of families and friends due to death, and illness and injury due to unhealthy and unsafe living conditions. In comparison, in modern times it is a vital part of an engineer’s job description to consider all of these factors in equal parts as it has been proven that they all play a significant role in the successful completion of a project. As a professional engineer in the 21st century, one of your duties is to guarantee the safety and protection of the surrounding community and environment, as well as all parties involved in the project.

1. Introduction
You may have heard people say things like:
• I need to make sense of what happened; or
• We should debrief or have a post mortem.

This is a conscious attempt to increase understanding and to learn from an event through reflection. Reflection is a process of unpacking and exploring experiences in order to gain new understandings, perspectives, and appreciations. This is an active process that requires you to think about your experiences and to make changes to your behavior based on what you have learned.

The outcomes of reflection may include:
• A new method, procedure, product and/or service;
• Clarification of unknowns or misconceptions;
• Development or refinement of skills; and/or
• Resolution of a problem or discovery of further questions that need answers.

You should reflect because if you learn to critically evaluate your actions and those of others, you will continuously learn from a variety of experiences which will make you a better student, employee, engineer, and person in general.

2. Short writing tasks
In Australian Engineering Practice, you are required to complete short writing tasks each week. These writing tasks are not meant to be just a regurgitation of what has been said in the book. They should help you to clarify your thoughts about what you are reading and importantly, you should think about how what you have read relates to YOU, to your experiences, your past performance and how you might improve your performance in the future.
When you are writing reflectively, think about:
1. What? – Briefly describe your topic or event in no more than two sentences.
2. So what? – Why is this relevant, what did you learn? This should be the largest section.
3. What else? – Have you experienced similar events within or outside of the course? What can you relate this experience to so you can broaden your understanding?
4. What now? – Now that you have learned something how will you apply this knowledge or skill?

Examples:
In the following examples, the level of reflection is bolded in square parentheses based on the previous reflection questions. These notations should not appear in your reflections as they are just shown to explain the process of reflective writing. Diary style writing typically only covers what happened which cannot be used as learning evidence. You should strive to achieve a higher level.

3. Final important points
• We understand that reflective writing is difficult but it will get easier to demonstrate your learning achievements as your skills improve over the term.
• It is not essential that your early entries are perfect examples of reflective writing. We will be looking for evidence that you have improved this skill over the term.
• If you are finding reflective writing too difficult then speak to your facilitator before it is too late.

This ENEG20001 - Engineering Assignment has been solved by our Engineering experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.