ENG7146: JDPi Automotive Manufacturers Case Study - Engineering Assignment Help

Assignment Task:

Learning Outcomes to be Assessed:

1. Evaluate common challenges faced by procurement and supply chain managers and how to overcome them.

2. Appraise main contracting issues and the legal implications for major programmes and projects for successful completion.

3. Critique the main legal issues that relate to the formation of relationships in supply chains

Description: 

JDPi Automotive manufacturer

JDPi is an automotive manufacturer and it has been operating a particular IT system for the past 5 years for some of its administration and payment arrangements. More recently though, it has been hit by an increasing frequency of system breakdowns and consequent periods of down-time. This has led to increasing loss of data and de-motivation of operating staff.

JDPi has decided to replace the existing system with the latest version. A business case was produced and approved at the appropriate levels of management. The supplier who had sold JDPi the existing system (Capgemini UK PLC) was asked to provide a feasibility study to assess how the system could be upgraded with a view to several objectives being satisfied, namely:

• Significant (and measurable) improvements in its general efficiency/effectiveness

• Response times being speeded up considerably

• Integration with other IT systems operating within the company to allow for sharing of information internally and externally with several suppliers and customers

The head of procurement, Ben Clegg, has formally stated that a competitive tendering exercise should be done to create a competition for the new software in accordance with JDPi’s procurement policy. A dispute between the head of human resources and Ben  has arisen as the head of human resources was unable to understand why JDPi cannot negotiate a deal with Capgemini UK PLC and why there is a need to delay things so that other quotes can be received.

Ben replied that ‘It is our normal policy for purchases costing in excess of $5,000, which this will be on a yearly basis, to run a competition between suppliers. This ensures we have a proper, fair competition in accordance with our procedures. I will need your help in developing a plan for sourcing this service from interested suppliers as we will need to create appropriate selection criteria that prequalifies interested suppliers. We also need to create award criteria as we should consider other factors in addition to the price for licensing the software. We should then operate a competitive tendering process in our normal way and ensure compliance with any necessary technical standards such as data protection issues’.

The stakeholders of JDPi have indicated that they will support the new tendering exercise as they have heard about an e-auction (reverse auction) system which is used to obtain bids on line and believe that this could save valuable time.

Your Task
Discuss the benefits for JDPi of using a competitive tendering approach (as well as the use of e-auction) to source the IT system. What common challenges faced by procurement and supply chain managers can be overcame? What other ways/strategies can be used to minimise those challenges?

This ENG7146: Engineering Assignment has been solved by our Engineering Experts at My Uni Paper. Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Be it a used or new solution, the quality of the work submitted by our assignment experts remains unhampered. You may continue to expect the same or even better quality with the used and new assignment solution files respectively. There’s one thing to be noticed that you could choose one between the two and acquire an HD either way. You could choose a new assignment solution file to get yourself an exclusive, plagiarism (with free Turnitin file), expert quality assignment or order an old solution file that was considered worthy of the highest distinction.