Engineering and Applied Technologies Assessment Journal Article

Assessment

Learning Outcomes Being Assessed

This assessment will assess the following learning outcomes and will contribute 30% to your final grade:

• Present research findings in a way that meets the needs of the target audience, highlighting implications and limitations of findings.

Following the collection of your data, you are required to present your findings in the form of a proposed journal article for publication. The format of your article must meet match that of Taylor & Francis Word Template for journal articles. A template is available on Moodle.

Output Required

Your proposed article should be 2000 words excluding references/ bibliography. Your journal article should include the following sections and headings:
1. Abstract

• Provide a brief overview of your project including background, methods, results, discussion and recommendations

2. Introduction

• Background literature
• Scope
• Objectives

3. Methodology 

• Project steps
  Data collection
  Statistical analysis

4. Results

• Project findings (displayed in tables and/or graphically)

5. Discussion

• Results interpretation
• Results comparison to the literature
• Research limitations
• Further required research

6. Conclusion

• Overall findings
• Recommendations

Assessment Requirements Overview

The given assessment required students to present their research findings in the format of a proposed journal article intended for publication. This task carried 30% of the final course grade and primarily assessed the student’s ability to communicate research findings effectively to a defined audience, while emphasizing the implications, limitations, and recommendations emerging from the research.

The final submission had to strictly follow the Taylor & Francis Word Template for journal articles and remain within a 2000-word limit (excluding references). The structure of the article was divided into six essential sections:

1. Abstract: A concise summary covering background, methods, results, discussion, and recommendations.
2. Introduction: Providing background literature, defining the research scope, and outlining key objectives.
3. Methodology: Describing the project steps, data collection methods, and statistical analysis techniques.
4. Results: Presenting findings using tables and graphical representations.
5. Discussion: Interpreting results, comparing them with existing literature, identifying limitations, and suggesting areas for further research.
6. Conclusion: Summarizing key findings and providing practical recommendations.

The overall purpose of this assessment was to evaluate the student’s capacity to translate research data into a coherent academic paper, demonstrating critical thinking, analytical writing, and academic communication skills.

Academic Mentor’s Approach Step-by-Step Guidance

The Academic Mentor guided the student throughout the process by breaking down the journal article development into structured, manageable stages. The focus was on ensuring that the student not only adhered to the required format but also developed strong analytical and presentation skills aligned with academic publishing standards.

Step 1: Understanding the Assessment Structure

The mentor began by reviewing the Taylor & Francis journal format with the student, explaining the purpose and expected content of each section. The mentor emphasized the importance of clarity, academic tone, and consistent formatting to meet scholarly publication standards.

Step 2: Drafting the Abstract

The student was guided to draft a concise and informative abstract summarizing the project’s background, methodology, key findings, and recommendations. The mentor encouraged focusing on precision and ensuring the abstract could independently communicate the essence of the paper.

Step 3: Developing the Introduction

Under the mentor’s direction, the student conducted a targeted literature review to establish the research context. The introduction was refined to clearly define the research scope, objectives, and significance, ensuring it set a strong foundation for the article.

Step 4: Structuring the Methodology

The mentor assisted the student in clearly documenting each research stepfrom data collection methods to analytical tools usedwhile maintaining alignment with ethical and academic standards. Guidance was given on presenting quantitative and qualitative data methods logically and transparently.

Step 5: Presenting the Results

The mentor supported the student in converting raw data into meaningful tables, graphs, and charts. The student was trained to interpret statistical outputs and ensure visual elements accurately represented the key findings.

Step 6: Writing the Discussion

In this crucial section, the mentor guided the student to interpret findings critically, compare them with existing literature, and highlight limitations. The mentor emphasized balancing objectivity and interpretation while maintaining academic depth.

Step 7: Formulating the Conclusion and Recommendations

The student summarized overall insights, drew meaningful conclusions, and crafted practical recommendations grounded in evidence. The mentor reviewed this section to ensure it logically tied back to the research objectives and aligned with the findings.

Step 8: Review and Formatting

Finally, the mentor reviewed the article for coherence, structure, and alignment with the Taylor & Francis template. Feedback was provided on referencing, academic tone, and consistency in formatting to meet publication standards.

Outcome and Learning Achievements

Through this structured guidance, the student successfully produced a well-formatted, publication-ready journal article that demonstrated analytical precision, research synthesis, and professional academic writing.

The following learning outcomes were effectively achieved:

• Ability to present research findings tailored to an academic audience.
• Enhanced skills in critical analysis and interpretation of data.
• Understanding of academic publishing formats and conventions.
• Competence in identifying research limitations and implications for further studies.

Get Inspired with This Sample But Keep It Original!

Looking for a clear direction on how to approach your assignment? You can download this sample solution to understand the correct structure, formatting, and academic writing style. It’s a great reference to help you craft your own high-quality paper.

However, remember this file is strictly for reference and study purposes only. Submitting it as your own work could lead to plagiarism issues and academic penalties.

If you need a fresh, plagiarism-free assignment written specifically for your topic and university requirements, our team of professional academic writers is ready to help. Every solution we deliver is custom-written, 100% original, and checked through advanced plagiarism tools before submission.

Why Order a Fresh Assignment?

• Tailored to your exact topic, guidelines, and marking rubric
• Written by qualified academic experts
• 100% plagiarism-free and fully referenced
• Delivered on time with revision support

Take the stress out of your studies use the sample as guidance or get a fully customized solution made just for you!

Download Sample Solution  Order Fresh Assignment